Literature DB >> 33705569

Left-digit bias and deceased donor kidney utilization.

S Ali Husain1,2, Kristen L King1,2, Sumit Mohan1,2,3.   

Abstract

Cognitive biases shown to impact medical decision-making include left-digit bias, the tendency to focus on a continuous variable's leftmost digit. We hypothesized that left-digit bias impacts deceased donor kidney utilization through heuristic processing of donor age and creatinine. We used US registry data to identify 87 019 kidneys recovered (2015-2019) and compared the proportion around thresholds for donor age (69 vs. 70 years) and creatinine (1.9 vs. 2.0 mg/dl), then compared the risk of kidney discard. Kidneys from donors aged 70 vs. 69 years were more frequently discarded (77% vs. 65%, p < .001), with higher risk of discard even after adjusting for KDRI (adjusted RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.21, p = .018). Similarly, kidneys from donors with final creatinine 2.0 vs. 1.9 mg/dl were more frequently discarded (37% vs. 29%, p < .001), with higher risk of discard after adjusting for KDRI (adjusted RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.07-1.33, p = .001). However, no significant left-digit effect was found when examining other donor age (39/40, 49/50, 59/60 years) or creatinine (0.9/1.0, 2.9/3.0 mg/dl) thresholds. The findings suggest a possible left-digit effect affecting kidney utilization at specific thresholds. Additional investigations of the impact of this and other heuristics on organ utilization are needed to identify potential areas for decision-making interventions aimed at reducing kidney discard.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cognitive heuristics; decision-making; kidney donor; kidney transplantation; organ utilization

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33705569      PMCID: PMC9162444          DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transplant        ISSN: 0902-0063            Impact factor:   3.456


  11 in total

1.  Teaching Critical Thinking: A Case for Instruction in Cognitive Biases to Reduce Diagnostic Errors and Improve Patient Safety.

Authors:  Celeste S Royce; Margaret M Hayes; Richard M Schwartzstein
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Factors leading to the discard of deceased donor kidneys in the United States.

Authors:  Sumit Mohan; Mariana C Chiles; Rachel E Patzer; Stephen O Pastan; S Ali Husain; Dustin J Carpenter; Geoffrey K Dube; R John Crew; Lloyd E Ratner; David J Cohen
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 10.612

3.  Behavioral Heuristics in Coronary-Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.

Authors:  Andrew R Olenski; André Zimerman; Stephen Coussens; Anupam B Jena
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Potential Impact of Risk and Loss Aversion on the Process of Accepting Kidneys for Transplantation.

Authors:  Raymond L Heilman; Ellen P Green; Kunam S Reddy; Adyr Moss; Bruce Kaplan
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Characteristics and Performance of Unilateral Kidney Transplants from Deceased Donors.

Authors:  Syed Ali Husain; Mariana C Chiles; Samnang Lee; Stephen O Pastan; Rachel E Patzer; Bekir Tanriover; Lloyd E Ratner; Sumit Mohan
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Default options in advance directives influence how patients set goals for end-of-life care.

Authors:  Scott D Halpern; George Loewenstein; Kevin G Volpp; Elizabeth Cooney; Kelly Vranas; Caroline M Quill; Mary S McKenzie; Michael O Harhay; Nicole B Gabler; Tatiana Silva; Robert Arnold; Derek C Angus; Cindy Bryce
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 7.  Choice architecture is a better strategy than engaging patients to spur behavior change.

Authors:  Robert F Nease; Sharon Glave Frazee; Larry Zarin; Steven B Miller
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  The weekend effect alters the procurement and discard rates of deceased donor kidneys in the United States.

Authors:  Sumit Mohan; Karl Foley; Mariana C Chiles; Geoffrey K Dube; Rachel E Patzer; Stephen O Pastan; R John Crew; David J Cohen; Lloyd E Ratner
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 9.  Cognitive biases associated with medical decisions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gustavo Saposnik; Donald Redelmeier; Christian C Ruff; Philippe N Tobler
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Rationale and design of the Novel Uses of adaptive Designs to Guide provider Engagement in Electronic Health Records (NUDGE-EHR) pragmatic adaptive randomized trial: a trial protocol.

Authors:  Julie C Lauffenburger; Thomas Isaac; Lorenzo Trippa; Punam Keller; Ted Robertson; Robert J Glynn; Thomas D Sequist; Dae H Kim; Constance P Fontanet; Edward W B Castonguay; Nancy Haff; Renee A Barlev; Mufaddal Mahesri; Chandrashekar Gopalakrishnan; Niteesh K Choudhry
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 7.327

View more
  2 in total

1.  Impact of Extending Eligibility for Reinstatement of Waiting Time After Early Allograft Failure: A Decision Analysis.

Authors:  S Ali Husain; Kristen L King; Joel T Adler; Sumit Mohan; Rimma Perotte
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 2.  The New Distance-Based Kidney Allocation System: Implications for Patients, Transplant Centers, and Organ Procurement Organizations.

Authors:  David C Cron; Syed A Husain; Joel T Adler
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2022-10-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.