Literature DB >> 33705416

Conservation genetics of the threatened plant species Physaria filiformis (Missouri bladderpod) reveals strong genetic structure and a possible cryptic species.

Christine E Edwards1, Brooke C Tessier1,2, Joel F Swift1, Burgund Bassüner1, Alexander G Linan1,3, Matthew A Albrecht1, George A Yatskievych1,4.   

Abstract

Understanding genetic diversity and structure in a rare species is critical for prioritizing both in situ and ex situ conservation efforts. One such rare species is Physaria filiformis (Brassicaceae), a threatened, winter annual plant species. The species has a naturally fragmented distribution, occupying three different soil types spread across four disjunct geographical locations in Missouri and Arkansas. The goals of this study were to understand: (1) whether factors associated with fragmentation and small population size (i.e., inbreeding, genetic drift or genetic bottlenecks) have reduced levels of genetic diversity, (2) how genetic variation is structured and which factors have influenced genetic structure, and (3) how much extant genetic variation of P. filiformis is currently publicly protected and the implications for the development of conservation strategies to protect its genetic diversity. Using 16 microsatellite markers, we genotyped individuals from 20 populations of P. filiformis from across its geographical range and one population of Physaria gracilis for comparison and analyzed genetic diversity and structure. Populations of P. filiformis showed comparable levels of genetic diversity to its congener, except a single population in northwest Arkansas showed evidence of a genetic bottleneck and two populations in the Ouachita Mountains of Arkansas showed lower genetic variation, consistent with genetic drift. Populations showed isolation by distance, indicating that migration is geographically limited, and analyses of genetic structure grouped individuals into seven geographically structured genetic clusters, with geographic location/spatial separation showing a strong influence on genetic structure. At least one population is protected for all genetic clusters except one in north-central Arkansas, which should therefore be prioritized for protection. Populations in the Ouachita Mountains were genetically divergent from the rest of P. filiformis; future morphological analyses are needed to identify whether it merits recognition as a new, extremely rare species.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33705416      PMCID: PMC7951829          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  35 in total

1.  Patterns of genetic variation in rare and widespread plant congeners.

Authors:  M A Gitzendanner; P S Soltis
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.844

2.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Using the AMOVA framework to estimate a standardized genetic differentiation measure.

Authors:  Patrick G Meirmans
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 4.  Ecological consequences of genetic diversity.

Authors:  A Randall Hughes; Brian D Inouye; Marc T J Johnson; Nora Underwood; Mark Vellend
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  High level of genetic differentiation for allelic richness among populations of the argan tree [Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels] endemic to Morocco.

Authors:  A El Mousadik; R J Petit
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Distortion of allele frequency distributions provides a test for recent population bottlenecks.

Authors:  G Luikart; F W Allendorf; J M Cornuet; W B Sherwin
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.645

7.  ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS.

Authors:  William R Rice
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 8.  Effects of zoochory on the spatial genetic structure of plant populations.

Authors:  Tiziana A Gelmi-Candusso; Eckhard W Heymann; Katrin Heer
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Using patterns of genetic structure based on microsatellite loci to test hypotheses of current hybridization, ancient hybridization and incomplete lineage sorting in Conradina (Lamiaceae).

Authors:  C E Edwards; D E Soltis; P S Soltis
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis.

Authors:  Laurent Excoffier; Guillaume Laval; Stefan Schneider
Journal:  Evol Bioinform Online       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 1.625

View more
  1 in total

1.  Life in the desert: The impact of geographic and environmental gradients on genetic diversity and population structure of Ivesia webberi.

Authors:  Israel T Borokini; Kelly B Klingler; Mary M Peacock
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 2.912

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.