Literature DB >> 33704589

ATM and ATR Activation Through Crosstalk Between DNA Damage Response Pathways.

Elizabeth A Fedak1,2, Frederick R Adler3,4, Lisa M Abegglen5,6,7, Joshua D Schiffman5,6,7.   

Abstract

Cells losing the ability to self-regulate in response to damage are a hallmark of cancer. When a cell encounters damage, regulatory pathways estimate the severity of damage and promote repair, cell cycle arrest, or apoptosis. This decision-making process would be remarkable if it were based on the total amount of damage in the cell, but because damage detection pathways vary in the rate and intensity with which they promote pro-apoptotic factors, the cell's real challenge is to reconcile dissimilar signals. Crosstalk between repair pathways, crosstalk between pro-apoptotic signaling kinases, and signals induced by damage by-products complicate the process further. The cell's response to [Formula: see text] and UV radiation neatly illustrates this concept. While these forms of radiation produce lesions associated with two different pro-apoptotic signaling kinases, ATM and ATR, recent experiments show that ATM and ATR react to both forms of radiation. To simulate the pro-apoptotic signal induced by [Formula: see text] and UV radiation, we construct a mathematical model that includes three modes of crosstalk between ATM and ATR signaling pathways: positive feedback between ATM/ATR and repair proteins, ATM and ATR mutual upregulation, and changes in lesion topology induced by replication stress or repair. We calibrate the model to agree with 21 experimental claims about ATM and ATR crosstalk. We alter the model by adding or removing specific processes and then examine the effects of each process on ATM/ATR crosstalk by recording which claims the altered model violates. Not only is this the first mathematical model of ATM/ATR crosstalk, it provides a strong argument for treating pro-apoptotic signaling as a holistic effort rather than attributing it to a single dominant kinase.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell regulatory network; DNA repair; Gamma radiation; Mechanistic model; UV radiation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33704589      PMCID: PMC8051223          DOI: 10.1007/s11538-021-00868-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Math Biol        ISSN: 0092-8240            Impact factor:   1.758


  59 in total

1.  Preferential binding of ATR protein to UV-damaged DNA.

Authors:  Keziban Unsal-Kaçmaz; Alexander M Makhov; Jack D Griffith; Aziz Sancar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  ATM activation by DNA double-strand breaks through the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex.

Authors:  Ji-Hoon Lee; Tanya T Paull
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-03-24       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  ATR kinase as master regulator of nucleotide excision repair during S phase of the cell cycle.

Authors:  Yannick Auclair; Raphael Rouget; Elliot A Drobetsky
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Unification of Protein Abundance Datasets Yields a Quantitative Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteome.

Authors:  Brandon Ho; Anastasia Baryshnikova; Grant W Brown
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 10.304

5.  DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation.

Authors:  Christopher J Bakkenist; Michael B Kastan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-30       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  UV-induced ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated and Rad3-related (ATR) activation requires replication stress.

Authors:  Irene M Ward; Kay Minn; Junjie Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Interplay between Mdm2 and HIPK2 in the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Xiao-Peng Zhang; Feng Liu; Wei Wang
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage.

Authors:  Shuhei Matsuoka; Bryan A Ballif; Agata Smogorzewska; E Robert McDonald; Kristen E Hurov; Ji Luo; Corey E Bakalarski; Zhenming Zhao; Nicole Solimini; Yaniv Lerenthal; Yosef Shiloh; Steven P Gygi; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  ATM regulates ATR chromatin loading in response to DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Myriam Cuadrado; Barbara Martinez-Pastor; Matilde Murga; Luis I Toledo; Paula Gutierrez-Martinez; Eva Lopez; Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2006-02-06       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  ATR- and ATM-Mediated DNA Damage Response Is Dependent on Excision Repair Assembly during G1 but Not in S Phase of Cell Cycle.

Authors:  Alo Ray; Chessica Blevins; Gulzar Wani; Altaf A Wani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Dose-dependent bioavailability and tissue distribution of the ATR inhibitor AZD6738 (ceralasertib) in mice.

Authors:  Brian F Kiesel; Jianxia Guo; Robert A Parise; Raman Venkataramanan; David A Clump; Christopher J Bakkenist; Jan H Beumer
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 3.288

Review 2.  Fanconi anemia and dyskeratosis congenita/telomere biology disorders: Two inherited bone marrow failure syndromes with genomic instability.

Authors:  Moisés Ó Fiesco-Roa; Benilde García-de Teresa; Paula Leal-Anaya; Renée van 't Hek; Talia Wegman-Ostrosky; Sara Frías; Alfredo Rodríguez
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 5.738

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.