Literature DB >> 33704389

Effect of Clear vs Standard Covered Masks on Communication With Patients During Surgical Clinic Encounters: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Ian M Kratzke1, Marcy E Rosenbaum2, Chase Cox1, David W Ollila1, Muneera R Kapadia1.   

Abstract

Importance: During the COVID-19 pandemic, wearing masks has become necessary, especially within health care. However, to our knowledge, the consequences of mask wearing on communication between surgeons and patients have not been studied. Objective: To evaluate the effects of clear vs standard covered masks on communication during surgical clinic encounters. Design: This randomized clinical trial examined communication between surgeons and their patients when surgeons wore clear vs covered masks in surgical outpatient clinics at a single academic medical center. New patients were recruited from participating surgeons' clinic schedules. Interventions: Surgeons wore either clear masks or covered masks for each clinic visit with a new patient, based on a per-visit randomization plan. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measures included patient perceptions of (1) surgeon communication and (2) trust in surgeons, as well as (3) quantitative assessments and (4) qualitative assessments regarding patient impressions of the surgeon's mask. After the clinic encounter, patients completed a verbal survey including validated Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems questions. Additional questions involved surgeon empathy, trust, and the patient's impression of the surgeon's mask. Data were analyzed by comparing patient data in the clear vs covered groups using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests, and comments were analyzed for themes.
Results: Two hundred patients were enrolled from 15 surgeons' clinics spanning 7 subspecialties. When surgeons wore a clear mask, patients rated their surgeons higher for providing understandable explanations (clear, 95 of 100 [95%] vs covered, 78 of 100 [78%]; P < .001), demonstrating empathy (clear, 99 [99%] vs covered, 85 [85%]; P < .001), and building trust (clear, 94 [94%] vs covered, 72 [72%]; P < .001). Patients preferred clear masks (clear, 100 [100%] vs covered, 72 [72%]; P < .001), citing improved surgeon communication and appreciation for visualization of the face. Conversely, 8 of 15 surgeons (53%) were unlikely to choose the clear mask over their standard covered mask. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial demonstrates that patients prefer to see their surgeon's face. Surgeons who wore clear masks were perceived by patients to be better communicators, have more empathy, and elicit greater trust. Because masks will remain part of the health care landscape for some time, deliberate attention to preserving communication within the surgeon-patient relationship is warranted. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04595695.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33704389      PMCID: PMC7953334          DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  15 in total

1.  The Effects of Face Masks on the Doctor-Patient Relationship in Orthopaedics.

Authors:  Shivani Pandya; Anil B Sedani; Alina Syros; Ramakanth R Yakkanti; Seth D Dodds; Amiethab A Aiyer
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2022-06

Review 2.  The contribution of respiratory and hearing protection use to psychological distress in the workplace: a scoping review.

Authors:  Richard Leung; Margaret M Cook; Mike F Capra; Kelly R Johnstone
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.851

3.  Masking care: A qualitative investigation of the impact of face masks on the experience of stroke rehabilitation from the perspective of staff and service users with communication difficulties.

Authors:  Philippa Clay; Katherine Broomfield
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2022-04-03       Impact factor: 2.909

4.  Knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to the COVID-19 pandemic among pregnant women in Bangkok, Thailand.

Authors:  Jadsada Kunno; Pataraporn Yubonpunt; Busaba Supawattanabodee; Chavanant Sumanasrethakul; Budsaba Wiriyasirivaj
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 3.105

5.  Face mask use in healthcare settings: effects on communication, cognition, listening effort and strategies for amelioration.

Authors:  Emily Lee; Kayla Cormier; Anu Sharma
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-01-10

6.  Patient and Health Care Worker Perceptions of Communication and Ability to Identify Emotion When Wearing Standard and Transparent Masks.

Authors:  Jacqueline N Chu; Joy E Collins; Tina T Chen; Peter R Chai; Farah Dadabhoy; James D Byrne; Adam Wentworth; Ian A DeAndrea-Lazarus; Christopher J Moreland; Jaime A B Wilson; Alicia Booth; Omkar Ghenand; Chin Hur; Giovanni Traverso
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-11-01

Review 7.  An International Commentary on Dysphagia and Dysphonia During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Anna Miles; Jackie McRae; Gemma Clunie; Patricia Gillivan-Murphy; Yoko Inamoto; Hanneke Kalf; Mershen Pillay; Susan Pownall; Philippa Ratcliffe; Theresa Richard; Ursula Robinson; Sarah Wallace; Martin B Brodsky
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.733

8.  Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Virus (COVID-19) Preventative Measures on Communication: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ilze Oosthuizen; Gabrielle H Saunders; Vinaya Manchaiah; De Wet Swanepoel
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-03-28

9.  Effects of Wearing Face Masks While Using Different Speaking Styles in Noise on Speech Intelligibility During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Hoyoung Yi; Ashly Pingsterhaus; Woonyoung Song
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-28

10.  Communication during the COVID-19 pandemic: evaluation study on self-perceived competences and views of health care professionals.

Authors:  Mathias Schlögl; Katrin Singler; Nicolas Martinez-Velilla; Schildmann Jan; Heike A Bischoff-Ferrari; Regina Elisabeth Roller-Wirnsberger; Jadwiga Attier-Zmudka; Christopher A Jones; Stéphanie Miot; Adam L Gordon
Journal:  Eur Geriatr Med       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 1.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.