Literature DB >> 33703925

Low-Dose MDCT of Patients With Spinal Instrumentation Using Sparse Sampling: Impact on Metal Artifacts.

Nico Sollmann1,2, Kai Mei3,4, Isabelle Riederer1, Simon Schön1, Jan S Kirschke1,2, Bernhard Meyer5, Claus Zimmer1, Thomas Baum1, Peter B Noël3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate simulated sparse-sampled MDCT combined with statistical iterative reconstruction (SIR) for low-dose imaging of patients with spinal instrumentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty-eight patients with implanted hardware after spinal instrumentation (24 patients with short- or long-term instrumentation-related complications [i.e., adjacent segment disease, screw loosening or implant failure, or postoperative hematoma or seroma] and 14 control subjects with no complications) underwent MDCT. Scans were simulated as if they were performed with 50% (P50), 25% (P25), 10% (P10), and 5% (P5) of the projections of the original acquisition using an in-house-developed SIR algorithm for advanced image reconstructions. Two readers performed qualitative image evaluations of overall image quality and artifacts, image contrast, inspection of the spinal canal, and diagnostic confidence (1 = high, 2 = medium, and 3 = low confidence). RESULTS. Although overall image quality decreased and artifacts increased with reductions in the number of projections, all complications were detected by both readers when 100% of the projections of the original acquisition (P100), P50, and P25 imaging data were used. For P25 data, diagnostic confidence was still high (mean score ± SD: reader 1, 1.2 ± 0.4; reader 2, 1.3 ± 0.5), and interreader agreement was substantial to almost perfect (weighted Cohen κ = 0.787-0.855). The mean volumetric CT dose index was 3.2 mGy for P25 data in comparison with 12.6 mGy for the original acquisition (P100 data). CONCLUSION. The use of sparse sampling and SIR for low-dose MDCT in patients with spinal instrumentation facilitated considerable reductions in radiation exposure. The use of P25 data with SIR resulted in no missed complications related to spinal instrumentation and allowed high diagnostic confidence, so using only 25% of the projections is probably enough for accurate and confident diagnostic detection of major instrumentation-related complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MDCT; artifacts; image enhancement; postoperative complications; spine

Year:  2021        PMID: 33703925     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.20.23083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  2 in total

1.  Impact of dose reduction and iterative model reconstruction on multi-detector CT imaging of the brain in patients with suspected ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Karolin J Paprottka; Karina Kupfer; Isabelle Riederer; Claus Zimmer; Meinrad Beer; Peter B Noël; Thomas Baum; Jan S Kirschke; Nico Sollmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Low-dose multi-detector computed tomography for periradicular infiltrations at the cervical and lumbar spine.

Authors:  Karolin J Paprottka; Karina Kupfer; Vivian Schultz; Meinrad Beer; Claus Zimmer; Thomas Baum; Jan S Kirschke; Nico Sollmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.