Fei Fei1, Gene P Siegal1,2, Shi Wei3,4. 1. Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, NP 3545, 619 19th St. South, Birmingham, AL, 35249-7331, USA. 2. O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35249, USA. 3. Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, NP 3545, 619 19th St. South, Birmingham, AL, 35249-7331, USA. swei@uabmc.edu. 4. O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35249, USA. swei@uabmc.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The biology of breast cancer with a low expression level (1-10%) of estrogen receptor (ER) remains a matter of confusion. The recent American Society of Oncology/College of American Pathologist Guidelines have recommended reporting such tumors as a new "ER-low-positive" category with a recommended comment to emphasize the possible overall benefit of endocrine therapies in these patients. The aim of the study was to analyze the clinicopathologic features and clinical outcomes of ER-low-positive breast cancers. METHODS: We characterized the clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes of ER-low-positive breast cancers in our 4179 patients diagnosed from 1998 to 2018. RESULTS: The ER-positive, ER-low-positive, and ER-negative cases in our cohort were 2982 (71.4%), 97 (2.3%), and 1100 (26.3%), respectively. ER-low-positive tumors showed similar clinicopathologic characteristics yet significantly superior prognosis when compared to ER-negative tumors, while demonstrated largely overlapping survival outcomes with ER-positive tumors in the entire cohort. In the subcohort of tumors with a PR-positive phenotype, the prognosis of ER-low-positive tumors was intermediate between that of the ER-positive and ER-negative groups. ER-low-positive/PR-positive tumors had a significantly worse prognosis than ER-positive tumors, and a trend toward favorable survival outcomes when compared to ER-negative tumors, although no significant difference was identified for the latter. In contrast, the ER-positive and ER-low-positive groups showed similar survival outcomes in the subset of tumors with a PR-negative status, both being significantly better than ER-negative tumors. CONCLUSIONS: PR status as a surrogate marker of functional ER signaling provides critical information in this regard. These findings suggest that while ER-low-positive tumors are themselves heterogeneous, they often respond to endocrine treatment. Analysis of molecular signatures and standardization of therapeutic strategies are important to understand the biology of ER-low-positive tumors and to enable optimal treatment in the pursuit of individualized medicine.
PURPOSE: The biology of breast cancer with a low expression level (1-10%) of estrogen receptor (ER) remains a matter of confusion. The recent American Society of Oncology/College of American Pathologist Guidelines have recommended reporting such tumors as a new "ER-low-positive" category with a recommended comment to emphasize the possible overall benefit of endocrine therapies in these patients. The aim of the study was to analyze the clinicopathologic features and clinical outcomes of ER-low-positive breast cancers. METHODS: We characterized the clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes of ER-low-positive breast cancers in our 4179 patients diagnosed from 1998 to 2018. RESULTS: The ER-positive, ER-low-positive, and ER-negative cases in our cohort were 2982 (71.4%), 97 (2.3%), and 1100 (26.3%), respectively. ER-low-positive tumors showed similar clinicopathologic characteristics yet significantly superior prognosis when compared to ER-negative tumors, while demonstrated largely overlapping survival outcomes with ER-positive tumors in the entire cohort. In the subcohort of tumors with a PR-positive phenotype, the prognosis of ER-low-positive tumors was intermediate between that of the ER-positive and ER-negative groups. ER-low-positive/PR-positive tumors had a significantly worse prognosis than ER-positive tumors, and a trend toward favorable survival outcomes when compared to ER-negative tumors, although no significant difference was identified for the latter. In contrast, the ER-positive and ER-low-positive groups showed similar survival outcomes in the subset of tumors with a PR-negative status, both being significantly better than ER-negative tumors. CONCLUSIONS: PR status as a surrogate marker of functional ER signaling provides critical information in this regard. These findings suggest that while ER-low-positive tumors are themselves heterogeneous, they often respond to endocrine treatment. Analysis of molecular signatures and standardization of therapeutic strategies are important to understand the biology of ER-low-positive tumors and to enable optimal treatment in the pursuit of individualized medicine.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; Estrogen receptor; Estrogen receptor-low-positive; Progesterone receptor; Survival
Authors: Shahla Bari; David Boulware; Jiannong Li; Loretta Loftus; Aixa Soyano Muller; Zena Jameel; Hung Khong; Brian J Czerniecki; Ricardo L B Costa Journal: Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) Date: 2022-08-06
Authors: Elena Lopez-Knowles; Simone Detre; Margaret Hills; Eugene F Schuster; Maggie C U Cheang; Holly Tovey; Lucy S Kilburn; Judith M Bliss; John Robertson; Elizabeth Mallon; Anthony Skene; Abigail Evans; Ian Smith; Mitch Dowsett Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2022-09-12 Impact factor: 8.408
Authors: Hesham Elghazaly; Hope S Rugo; Hamdy A Azim; Sandra M Swain; Banu Arun; Matti Aapro; Edith A Perez; Benjamin O Anderson; Frederique Penault-Llorca; Pierfranco Conte; Nagi S El Saghir; Cheng-Har Yip; Marwan Ghosn; Philip Poortmans; Mohamed A Shehata; Armando E Giuliano; Jessica W T Leung; Valentina Guarneri; Joseph Gligorov; Bahadir M Gulluoglu; Hany Abdel Aziz; Mona Frolova; Mohamed Sabry; Charles M Balch; Roberto Orecchia; Heba M El-Zawahry; Sana Al-Sukhun; Khaled Abdel Karim; Alaa Kandil; Ruslan M Paltuev; Meteb Foheidi; Mohamed El-Shinawi; Manal ElMahdy; Omalkhair Abulkhair; Wentao Yang; Adel T Aref; Joaira Bakkach; Nermean Bahie Eldin; Hagar Elghazawy Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-05-08 Impact factor: 6.639