Literature DB >> 33694028

Bone quality analysis of jaw bones in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus-post mortem anatomical and microstructural evaluation.

Teodora Rodic1, Eva Maria Wölfel2, Petar Milovanovic1,2, Imke A K Fiedler2, Danica Cvetkovic3, Katharina Jähn2, Michael Amling2, Jelena Sopta4, Slobodan Nikolic3, Vladimir Zivkovic3, Björn Busse2, Marija Djuric5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: With the higher risk of dental implant failure with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), there is a need to characterize the jaw bones in those individuals. The aim of this post mortem study was to compare jaw bone quality of individuals with T2DM to healthy controls.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Bone cores from the edentulous lower first molar region and the region of mandibular angle were collected from male individuals with T2DM (n = 10, 70.6 ± 4.5 years) and healthy controls (n = 11, 71.5 ± 3.8 years) during autopsy. Within the T2DM, a subgroup treated with oral antidiabetics (OAD) and one on insulin were identified. Bone quality assessment encompassed evaluation of bone microstructure, matrix composition, and cellular activity, using microcomputed tomography (micro-CT), quantitative backscattered electron imaging (qBEI), Raman spectroscopy, and bone histomorphometry.
RESULTS: In the mandibular angle, T2DM showed 51% lower porosity of the lingual cortex (p = 0.004) and 21% higher trabecular thickness (p = 0.008) compared to control. More highly mineralized bone packets were found in the buccal cortex of the mandibular angle in insulin-treated compared to OAD-treated T2DM group (p = 0.034). In the molar region, we found higher heterogeneity of trabecular calcium content in T2DM insulin compared to controls (p = 0.015) and T2DM OAD (p = 0.019). T2DM was associated with lower osteocyte lacunar size in the trabecular bone of the molar region (vs. control p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Alterations in microstructure, mineralization, and osteocyte morphology were determined in jaw bone of individuals with T2DM compared to controls. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Future studies will have to verify if the mild changes determined in this study will translate to potential contraindications for dental implant placements.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone; Jaw; Microstructure; Mineralization; Osteocytes; Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33694028     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03751-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  65 in total

Review 1.  Dental implants and diabetes: conditions for success.

Authors:  F Marchand; A Raskin; A Dionnes-Hornes; T Barry; N Dubois; R Valéro; B Vialettes
Journal:  Diabetes Metab       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 6.041

2.  Peri-implant evaluation of immediately loaded implants placed in esthetic zone in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2: a two-year study.

Authors:  Antonio Aguilar-Salvatierra; José Luis Calvo-Guirado; Maximino González-Jaranay; Gerardo Moreu; Rafael Arcesio Delgado-Ruiz; Gerardo Gómez-Moreno
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 3.  Diabetes and oral implant failure: a systematic review.

Authors:  B R Chrcanovic; T Albrektsson; A Wennerberg
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  The effects of elevated hemoglobin A(1c) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on dental implants: Survival and stability at one year.

Authors:  Thomas W Oates; Patrick Galloway; Peggy Alexander; Adriana Vargas Green; Guy Huynh-Ba; Jocelyn Feine; C Alex McMahan
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.634

5.  Dental Implant Survival and Complication Rate over 2 Years for Individuals with Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Caroline C Eskow; Thomas W Oates
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.932

Review 6.  Diabetes mellitus and oral health.

Authors:  Marina George Kudiyirickal; Joseph M Pappachan
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.633

7.  Impact of local and systemic factors on the incidence of late oral implant loss.

Authors:  Ghada Alsaadi; Marc Quirynen; Arnost Komárek; Daniel van Steenberghe
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 8.  Fixation of mandibular angle fractures: clinical studies.

Authors:  Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-11-24

Review 9.  Dental implants and diabetes mellitus-a systematic review.

Authors:  Hendrik Naujokat; Burkhard Kunzendorf; Jörg Wiltfang
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2016-02-11

10.  Descriptive retrospective study analyzing relevant factors related to dental implant failure.

Authors:  L Castellanos-Cosano; A Rodriguez-Perez; S Spinato; M Wainwright; G Machuca-Portillo; M-A Serrera-Figallo; D Torres-Lagares
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2019-11-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Integrin α10 regulates adhesion, migration, and osteogenic differentiation of alveolar bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in type 2 diabetic patients who underwent dental implant surgery.

Authors:  Chao Liang; Xiu Liu; Changying Liu; Yifan Xu; Wei Geng; Jun Li
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 6.832

2.  Pulsed electromagnetic fields inhibit mandibular bone deterioration depending on the Wnt3a/β-catenin signaling activation in type 2 diabetic db/db mice.

Authors:  Jianjun Li; Jing Cai; Liheng Liu; Yuwei Wu; Yan Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.