Kyeong Taek Oh1, Dongwoo Kim2, Byoung Seok Ye3, Sangwon Lee2, Mijin Yun4, Sun Kook Yoo5. 1. Department of Medical Engineering, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Neurology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. YUNMIJIN@yuhs.ac. 5. Department of Medical Engineering, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. SUNKYOO@yuhs.ac.
Abstract
PURPOSE: White matter hyperintensities (WMH) are typically segmented using MRI because WMH are hardly visible on 18F-FDG PET/CT. This retrospective study was conducted to segment WMH and estimate their volumes from 18F-FDG PET with a generative adversarial network (WhyperGAN). METHODS: We selected patients whose interval between MRI and FDG PET/CT scans was within 3 months, from January 2017 to December 2018, and classified them into mild, moderate, and severe groups by following the semiquantitative rating method of Fazekas. For each group, 50 patients were selected, and of them, we randomly selected 35 patients for training and 15 for testing. WMH were automatically segmented from FLAIR MRI with manual adjustment. Patches of WMH were extracted from 18F-FDG PET and segmented MRI. WhyperGAN was compared with H-DenseUnet, a deep learning method widely used for segmentation tasks, for segmentation performance based on the dice similarity coefficient (DSC), recall, and average volume differences (AVD). For volume estimation, the predicted WMH volumes from PET were compared with ground truth volumes. RESULTS: The DSC values were associated with WMH volumes on MRI. For volumes >60 mL, the DSC values were 0.751 for WhyperGAN and 0.564 for H-DenseUnet. For volumes ≤60 mL, the DSC values rapidly decreased as the volume decreased (0.362 for WhyperGAN vs. 0.237 for H-DenseUnet). For recall, WhyperGAN achieved the highest value in the severe group (0.579 for WhyperGAN vs. 0.509 for H-DenseUnet). For AVD, WhyperGAN achieved the lowest score in the severe group (0.494 for WhyperGAN vs. 0.941 for H-DenseUnet). For the WMH volume estimation, WhyperGAN performed better than H-DenseUnet and yielded excellent correlation coefficients (r = 0.998, 0.983, and 0.908 in the severe, moderate, and mild group). CONCLUSIONS: Although limited by visual analysis, the WhyperGAN based can be used to automatically segment and estimate volumes of WMH from 18F-FDG PET/CT. This would increase the usefulness of 18F-FDG PET/CT for the evaluation of WMH in patients with cognitive impairment.
PURPOSE: White matter hyperintensities (WMH) are typically segmented using MRI because WMH are hardly visible on 18F-FDG PET/CT. This retrospective study was conducted to segment WMH and estimate their volumes from 18F-FDG PET with a generative adversarial network (WhyperGAN). METHODS: We selected patients whose interval between MRI and FDG PET/CT scans was within 3 months, from January 2017 to December 2018, and classified them into mild, moderate, and severe groups by following the semiquantitative rating method of Fazekas. For each group, 50 patients were selected, and of them, we randomly selected 35 patients for training and 15 for testing. WMH were automatically segmented from FLAIR MRI with manual adjustment. Patches of WMH were extracted from 18F-FDG PET and segmented MRI. WhyperGAN was compared with H-DenseUnet, a deep learning method widely used for segmentation tasks, for segmentation performance based on the dice similarity coefficient (DSC), recall, and average volume differences (AVD). For volume estimation, the predicted WMH volumes from PET were compared with ground truth volumes. RESULTS: The DSC values were associated with WMH volumes on MRI. For volumes >60 mL, the DSC values were 0.751 for WhyperGAN and 0.564 for H-DenseUnet. For volumes ≤60 mL, the DSC values rapidly decreased as the volume decreased (0.362 for WhyperGAN vs. 0.237 for H-DenseUnet). For recall, WhyperGAN achieved the highest value in the severe group (0.579 for WhyperGAN vs. 0.509 for H-DenseUnet). For AVD, WhyperGAN achieved the lowest score in the severe group (0.494 for WhyperGAN vs. 0.941 for H-DenseUnet). For the WMH volume estimation, WhyperGAN performed better than H-DenseUnet and yielded excellent correlation coefficients (r = 0.998, 0.983, and 0.908 in the severe, moderate, and mild group). CONCLUSIONS: Although limited by visual analysis, the WhyperGAN based can be used to automatically segment and estimate volumes of WMH from 18F-FDG PET/CT. This would increase the usefulness of 18F-FDG PET/CT for the evaluation of WMH in patients with cognitive impairment.
Authors: Ioannis D Apostolopoulos; Nikolaos D Papathanasiou; Dimitris J Apostolopoulos; George S Panayiotakis Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2022-04-22 Impact factor: 10.057