| Literature DB >> 33693641 |
Giulia E Tyzack1,2, Jacob Neeves1,2, Hamish Crerar1,2, Pierre Klein1,2, Oliver Ziff1,2, Doaa M Taha1,2,3, Raphaëlle Luisier4, Nicholas M Luscombe1,5,6, Rickie Patani1,2.
Abstract
We recently described aberrantly increased cytoplasmic SFPQ intron-retaining transcripts (IRTs) and concurrent SFPQ protein mislocalization as new hallmarks of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). However, the generalizability and potential roles of cytoplasmic IRTs in health and disease remain unclear. Here, using time-resolved deep sequencing of nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions of human induced pluripotent stem cells undergoing motor neurogenesis, we reveal that ALS-causing VCP gene mutations lead to compartment-specific aberrant accumulation of IRTs. Specifically, we identify >100 IRTs with increased cytoplasmic abundance in ALS samples. Furthermore, these aberrant cytoplasmic IRTs possess sequence-specific attributes and differential predicted binding affinity to RNA binding proteins. Remarkably, TDP-43, SFPQ and FUS-RNA binding proteins known for nuclear-to-cytoplasmic mislocalization in ALS-abundantly and specifically bind to this aberrant cytoplasmic pool of IRTs. Our data are therefore consistent with a novel role for cytoplasmic IRTs in regulating compartment-specific protein abundance. This study provides new molecular insight into potential pathomechanisms underlying ALS and highlights aberrant cytoplasmic IRTs as potential therapeutic targets.Entities:
Keywords: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; cytoplasmic intron retention; human stem cell model; nuclear/cytoplasmic fractionation; protein mislocalization
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33693641 PMCID: PMC8370440 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awab078
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain ISSN: 0006-8950 Impact factor: 13.501
Figure 1Time-resolved cellular fractionation and RNA sequencing during human motor neurogenesis reveals widespread Aberrant cytoplasmic intron retention is a blueprint for RNA binding protein mislocalization in VCP-related ALS. (A) Schematic depiction of the iPSC differentiation strategy for motor neurogenesis. Arrows indicate sampling time points in days when cells were fractionated into nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments prior to deep [poly(A)] RNA sequencing. Four iPSC clones were obtained from four different healthy controls and three iPSC clones from two ALS patients with VCP mutations: R155C and R191Q; hereafter termed VCP. NPCs = neural precursors; pMN = ‘patterned’ precursor motor neurons (ventral spinal cord); MN = post-mitotic but electrophysiologically inactive motor neurons; mMN = electrophysiologically active motor neurons. (B) Representative QC data for fractionation of samples at DIV = 14 at protein level (western blot, top) and RNA level [quantitative (q)PCR, bottom]. In the western blot, histone H3 and PSPC1 were chosen as protein markers for the nuclear faction, and GAPDH was used as a cytosolic marker. In the qPCR, the ratio between intronic and exonic GAPDH sequences was measured in both fractions to exclude the leakage of nuclear RNA into the cytosolic fraction due to disruption of nuclei during the fractionation. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) from four lines per group. (C) Singular value decomposition (SVD)performed on normalized 18 834 gene expression values across 95 samples. Samples are plotted by their coordinates along PC1 (41% of variance) and PC2 (15% of variance). Colours of data-points indicate similar time in culture: iPSC (dark blue), DIV = 3 (blue; NPC1), DIV = 7 (light blue; NPC2), DIV = 14 (grey; pMN), DIV = 22 (light green; MN) and DIV = 35 (dark green; eMN). (D) Same as C with colours of data-points indicating similar cellular fractions: nuclear fraction (gold) and cytoplasmic fraction (blue). (E) Same as C with colours of data-points indicating either control samples (red) or VCP samples (blue). (F) Top: Pie charts representing proportions of included splicing events in VCP at all time points of motor neurogenesis compared with age-matched control samples in nuclear (top chart) and cytoplasmic (bottom chart) fractions. Total number of events are indicated above the chart. Alt5 and Alt3 = alternative 5′ and 3′ UTR; AltEx = alternative exon; MIC = microexons; IR = intron retention. Bottom: Bar graphs representing the number of retained introns in VCP compared to control samples at specific time points during motor neuron differentiation. Nuclear fraction (gold; left). Cytoplasmic fraction (blue; right). (G) Box plots showing the distributions of cytoplasmic log2 fold-changes for 72 essential splicing factor genes (Supplementary Table 9) between VCP and controls.
Figure 2Aberrant nuclear and cytoplasmic intronic sequences exhibit distinct characteristics. (A) Schematic of our proposed taxonomy for aberrant IRTs (left) and bar graphs (right) representing the numbers of retained introns in VCP compared to control samples at DIV = 14 that are predominantly nuclear (gold), in both the nucleus and cytoplasm (grey), or predominant in cytoplasm (blue). The number of events in each category is indicated above the bar. (B) Bar plots displaying the enrichment scores for GO biological functions of genes that are targeted by each group of aberrantly retained introns. (C and D) Box plots displaying the distribution of percentage retention for all 349 manually curated retained introns, 237 nuclear retained introns (gold), 63 cytoplasmic and nuclear retained introns, and 49 cytoplasmic retained introns in control motor neurons (white boxes), FUS mutant motor neurons (green boxes; C) or SOD1 mutant motor neurons samples (blue boxes; D)., Mutant samples systematically exhibit a higher proportion of intron retention compared with controls. P-values obtained from linear mixed models accounting for idiosyncratic variations between the iPSC lines. Data shown as box plots in which the centre line is the median, limits are the interquartile range and whiskers are the minimum and maximum. (E) Bar graphs quantifying percentage intron retention in SFPQ transcripts at DIV = 0, 3, 7 and 14 in control and VCP samples (mean ± SD; Fisher count test) in the nucleus (left) and cytoplasm (right). (F) Bar graph showing intron retention levels analysed by qPCR at DIV =14 in control and VCP cytosolic fractions for SFPQ and measured by normalizing the levels of SFPQ IRT over the SFPQ expression level for each line. (G) Abundance of SFPQ IRT in the cytoplasm at DIV = 14 measured by qPCR and normalized over the compartment-specific housekeeping genes NIT1 and NFX1. In F and G, data are expressed as fold-change over the control group mean; data displayed as bar plots with mean ± SD from four lines per group, with each data-point representing the average across two technical replicates (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, unpaired t-test).
Figure 3Cytoplasmic IRTs create a mislocalization-prone environment for bound RBPs. (A–D) Comparison of intron length, GC content (%), conservation scores and median enrichment for RBP binding sites of the three groups of aberrantly retained introns. Box plots are as shown in Fig. 1. (C and D) P-values obtained from Mann-Whitney test. All introns in the gene-set targeted by intron retention in VCP at DIV = 14 (white). (E) Heat map of the enrichment score of the crosslinking events in each of the 49 predominantly cytoplasmic aberrant IRTs for 27 RBPs that exhibit significantly higher enrichment compared to the two other categories of IRTs (i.e. predominantly nuclear and those that are both cytoplasmic and nuclear). (F) Network of protein–protein interactions for 21 (out of the 27) RBPs for which binding sites are enriched in cytoplasmic aberrant retained introns. Edges represent experimentally determined protein–protein interactions annotated in the STRING database. Nine of these RBPs belong to the ‘Processing of Capped Intron-Containing Pre-mRNA’ Reactome pathway (filled magenta circles) and three are RBPs that exhibit hallmark nuclear-to-cytoplasmic mislocalization ALS (green circle). Line thickness indicates the strength of data support based on text mining and experiments. (G) Comparison of enrichment across all genes within each category for SFPQ crosslinking events in the retained introns between the three groups of aberrantly retained introns. (H) RNA immunoprecipitation (IP) performed on the cytoplasmic lysates from control and VCP at DIV = 14 using antibodies for SFPQ or normal IgG as negative control. Levels of associated mRNA transcripts were analysed by qRT-PCR using primers designed against the indicated targets (n = 4). See also Supplementary Fig. 3A. (I) Bar graphs showing qRT-PCR analysis of levels of indicated transcripts in total input of cytoplasmic lysates from DIV = 14 control and VCP samples. Values were normalized to the geometric mean of two compartment-specific housekeeping genes, NFX1 and NIT1, before being expressed as fold-change over control group mean. *P < 0.05 Mann-Whitney test, n = 4 lines per group.
Figure 4Schematic of proposed model‘ where cytoplasmic IRT accumulation in ALS leads to protein mislocalization.