Literature DB >> 33693368

A Review of Microsoft Academic Services for Science of Science Studies.

Kuansan Wang1, Zhihong Shen1, Chiyuan Huang1, Chieh-Han Wu1, Darrin Eide1, Yuxiao Dong1, Junjie Qian1, Anshul Kanakia1, Alvin Chen1, Richard Rogahn1.   

Abstract

Since the relaunch of Microsoft Academic Services (MAS) 4 years ago, scholarly communications have undergone dramatic changes: more ideas are being exchanged online, more authors are sharing their data, and more software tools used to make discoveries and reproduce the results are being distributed openly. The sheer amount of information available is overwhelming for individual humans to keep up and digest. In the meantime, artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have made great strides and the cost of computing has plummeted to the extent that it has become practical to employ intelligent agents to comprehensively collect and analyze scholarly communications. MAS is one such effort and this paper describes its recent progresses since the last disclosure. As there are plenty of independent studies affirming the effectiveness of MAS, this paper focuses on the use of three key AI technologies that underlies its prowess in capturing scholarly communications with adequate quality and broad coverage: (1) natural language understanding in extracting factoids from individual articles at the web scale, (2) knowledge assisted inference and reasoning in assembling the factoids into a knowledge graph, and (3) a reinforcement learning approach to assessing scholarly importance for entities participating in scholarly communications, called the saliency, that serves both as an analytic and a predictive metric in MAS. These elements enhance the capabilities of MAS in supporting the studies of science of science based on the GOTO principle, i.e., good and open data with transparent and objective methodologies. The current direction of development and how to access the regularly updated data and tools from MAS, including the knowledge graph, a REST API and a website, are also described.
Copyright © 2019 Wang, Shen, Huang, Wu, Eide, Dong, Qian, Kanakia, Chen and Rogahn.

Entities:  

Keywords:  academic search; artificail intelligence (AI); knowledge graph (KG); machine cognition; microsoft academic graph; microsoft academic services

Year:  2019        PMID: 33693368      PMCID: PMC7931949          DOI: 10.3389/fdata.2019.00045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Big Data        ISSN: 2624-909X


  9 in total

1.  Deep forecasting of translational impact in medical research.

Authors:  Amy P K Nelson; Robert J Gray; James K Ruffle; Henry C Watkins; Daniel Herron; Nick Sorros; Danil Mikhailov; M Jorge Cardoso; Sebastien Ourselin; Nick McNally; Bryan Williams; Geraint E Rees; Parashkev Nachev
Journal:  Patterns (N Y)       Date:  2022-04-08

2.  Mitigating Biases in CORD-19 for Analyzing COVID-19 Literature.

Authors:  Anshul Kanakia; Kuansan Wang; Yuxiao Dong; Boya Xie; Kyle Lo; Zhihong Shen; Lucy Lu Wang; Chiyuan Huang; Darrin Eide; Sebastian Kohlmeier; Chieh-Han Wu
Journal:  Front Res Metr Anal       Date:  2020-11-23

3.  A Glimpse of the First Eight Months of the COVID-19 Literature on Microsoft Academic Graph: Themes, Citation Contexts, and Uncertainties.

Authors:  Chaomei Chen
Journal:  Front Res Metr Anal       Date:  2020-12-23

4.  Connecting firm's web scraped textual content to body of science: Utilizing microsoft academic graph hierarchical topic modeling.

Authors:  Arash Hajikhani; Lukas Pukelis; Arho Suominen; Sajad Ashouri; Torben Schubert; Ad Notten; Scott W Cunningham
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2022-02-27

5.  A dataset of mentorship in bioscience with semantic and demographic estimations.

Authors:  Qing Ke; Lizhen Liang; Ying Ding; Stephen V David; Daniel E Acuna
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 8.501

6.  Gender-diverse teams produce more novel and higher-impact scientific ideas.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Tanya Y Tian; Teresa K Woodruff; Benjamin F Jones; Brian Uzzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 12.779

7.  Untangling the network effects of productivity and prominence among scientists.

Authors:  Weihua Li; Sam Zhang; Zhiming Zheng; Skyler J Cranmer; Aaron Clauset
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 17.694

8.  The association between early career informal mentorship in academic collaborations and junior author performance.

Authors:  Bedoor AlShebli; Kinga Makovi; Talal Rahwan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 9.  Technological advances in preclinical meta-research.

Authors:  Alexandra Bannach-Brown; Kaitlyn Hair; Zsanett Bahor; Nadia Soliman; Malcolm Macleod; Jing Liao
Journal:  BMJ Open Sci       Date:  2021-07-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.