Literature DB >> 33693352

Reflections on Gender Analyses of Bibliographic Corpora.

Helena Mihaljević1, Marco Tullney2, Lucía Santamaría3, Christian Steinfeldt1.   

Abstract

The interplay between an academic's gender and their scholarly output is a riveting topic at the intersection of scientometrics, data science, gender studies, and sociology. Its effects can be studied to analyze the role of gender in research productivity, tenure and promotion standards, collaboration and networks, or scientific impact, among others. The typical methodology in this field of research is based on a number of assumptions that are customarily not discussed in detail in the relevant literature, but undoubtedly merit a critical examination. Presumably the most confronting aspect is the categorization of gender. An author's gender is typically inferred from their name, further reduced to a binary feature by an algorithmic procedure. This and subsequent data processing steps introduce biases whose effects are hard to estimate. In this report we describe said problems and discuss the reception and interplay of this line of research within the field. We also outline the effect of obstacles, such as non-availability of data and code for transparent communication. Building on our research on gender effects on scientific publications, we challenge the prevailing methodology in the field and offer a critical reflection on some of its flaws and pitfalls. Our observations are meant to open up the discussion around the need and feasibility of more elaborated approaches to tackle gender in conjunction with analyses of bibliographic sources.
Copyright © 2019 Mihaljević, Tullney, Santamaría and Steinfeldt.

Entities:  

Keywords:  automatic gender recognition; bias; data science; gender; reproducibility; science studies; societal issues

Year:  2019        PMID: 33693352      PMCID: PMC7931878          DOI: 10.3389/fdata.2019.00029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Big Data        ISSN: 2624-909X


  2 in total

1.  Important Questions Deserve Rigorous Analysis: A Cautionary Note About Selection Bias.

Authors:  Lucia C Petito; Louisa H Smith
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 6.106

2.  Diversifying history: A large-scale analysis of changes in researcher demographics and scholarly agendas.

Authors:  Stephan Risi; Mathias W Nielsen; Emma Kerr; Emer Brady; Lanu Kim; Daniel A McFarland; Dan Jurafsky; James Zou; Londa Schiebinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.