Literature DB >> 3369325

Validity and usefulness of medical chart weights in the long-term evaluation of weight loss programs.

V J Stevens1, E L Wagner, J Rossner, S Craddick, M R Greenlick.   

Abstract

The high rate of delayed recidivism seen in behavioral weight loss studies makes follow-up over a number of years essential. Unfortunately, these data are both expensive and difficult to collect. This report examines the validity of body weights routinely recorded in medical charts and their usefulness in the long-term evaluation of weight control programs. Comparison of 123 pairs of chart weights and research clinic weights recorded within 30 days of each other showed a mean difference of .06 lb (.03 kg) and a standard deviation of 2.38 lb (1.08 kg). This measurement error is considerably less than that seen in self-reported weights of obese adults. The accuracy, economy and relative ease of collection make the use of medical chart weights well suited for long-term evaluations of weight loss studies and other research purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3369325     DOI: 10.1016/0306-4603(88)90007-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addict Behav        ISSN: 0306-4603            Impact factor:   3.913


  12 in total

1.  Availability and utility of body mass index for population-based cancer surveillance.

Authors:  Theresa H M Keegan; Gem M Le; Laura A McClure; Sally L Glaser
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Can Electronic Health Records Validly Estimate the Effects of Health System Interventions Aimed at Controlling Body Weight?

Authors:  Kristie Kusibab; John A Gallis; Joseph R Egger; Maren K Olsen; Sandy Askew; Dori M Steinberg; Gary Bennett
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2020-09-27       Impact factor: 5.002

3.  Validation of clinic weights from electronic health records against standardized weight measurements in weight loss trials.

Authors:  Lan Xiao; Nan Lv; Lisa G Rosas; David Au; Jun Ma
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 5.002

4.  Association between lifestyle, menstrual/reproductive history, and histological factors and risk of breast cancer in women biopsied for benign breast disease.

Authors:  Rhonda Arthur; Yihong Wang; Kenny Ye; Andrew G Glass; Mindy Ginsberg; Olivier Loudig; Thomas Rohan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Evaluating the Implementation of a Digital Diabetes Prevention Program in an Integrated Health Care Delivery System Among Older Adults: Results of a Natural Experiment.

Authors:  Stephanie L Fitzpatrick; Meghan Mayhew; Andreea M Rawlings; Ning Smith; Denis B Nyongesa; William M Vollmer; Victor J Stevens; Sarah K Grall; Stephen P Fortmann
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2022

6.  Comparison of weight loss data collected by research technicians versus electronic medical records: the PROPEL trial.

Authors:  Peter T Katzmarzyk; Emily F Mire; Corby K Martin; Robert L Newton; John W Apolzan; Eboni G Price-Haywood; Kara D Denstel; Ronald Horswell; San T Chu; William D Johnson
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 5.551

7.  Weight Status Measures Collected in the Healthy Communities Study: Protocols and Analyses.

Authors:  Christopher J Sroka; Kerry L McIver; Robyn D F Sagatov; S Sonia Arteaga; Edward A Frongillo
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Validity of Clinical Body Weight Measures as Substitutes for Missing Data in a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  David Arterburn; Laura Ichikawa; Evette J Ludman; Belinda Operskalski; Jennifer A Linde; Emily Anderson; Paul Rohde; Robert W Jeffery; Greg E Simon
Journal:  Obes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.288

9.  Longitudinal assessment of BMI in relation to ADT use among early stage prostate cancer survivors.

Authors:  Gregory P Beehler; Michael Wade; Borah Kim; Lynn Steinbrenner; Laura O Wray
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.442

10.  Prepare, a randomized trial to promote and evaluate weight loss among overweight and obese women planning pregnancy: Study design and rationale.

Authors:  Erin S LeBlanc; Kimberly K Vesco; Kristine L Funk; Njeri Karanja; Ning Smith; Victor J Stevens
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.