Literature DB >> 33692980

In vitro Assessment of the DNA Damage Response in Dental Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Following Low Dose X-ray Exposure.

Niels Belmans1,2, Liese Gilles2,3, Jonas Welkenhuysen4, Randy Vermeesen2, Bjorn Baselet2, Benjamin Salmon5,6, Sarah Baatout2, Reinhilde Jacobs7,8, Stéphane Lucas9, Ivo Lambrichts2, Marjan Moreels2.   

Abstract

Stem cells contained within the dental mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) population are crucial for tissue homeostasis. Assuring their genomic stability is therefore essential. Exposure of stem cells to ionizing radiation (IR) is potentially detrimental for normal tissue homeostasis. Although it has been established that exposure to high doses of ionizing radiation (IR) has severe adverse effects on MSCs, knowledge about the impact of low doses of IR is lacking. Here we investigated the effect of low doses of X-irradiation with medical imaging beam settings (<0.1 Gray; 900 mGray per hour), in vitro, on pediatric dental mesenchymal stromal cells containing dental pulp stem cells from deciduous teeth, dental follicle progenitor cells and stem cells from the apical papilla. DNA double strand break (DSB) formation and repair kinetics were monitored by immunocytochemistry of γH2AX and 53BP1 as well as cell cycle progression by flow cytometry and cellular senescence by senescence-associated β-galactosidase assay and ELISA. Increased DNA DSB repair foci, after exposure to low doses of X-rays, were measured as early as 30 min post-irradiation. The number of DSBs returned to baseline levels 24 h after irradiation. Cell cycle analysis revealed marginal effects of IR on cell cycle progression, although a slight G2/M phase arrest was seen in dental pulp stromal cells from deciduous teeth 72 h after irradiation. Despite this cell cycle arrest, no radiation-induced senescence was observed. In conclusion, low X-ray IR doses (< 0.1 Gray; 900 mGray per hour), were able to induce significant increases in the number of DNA DSBs repair foci, but cell cycle progression seems to be minimally affected. This highlights the need for more detailed and extensive studies on the effects of exposure to low IR doses on different mesenchymal stromal cells.
Copyright © 2021 Belmans, Gilles, Welkenhuysen, Vermeesen, Baselet, Salmon, Baatout, Jacobs, Lucas, Lambrichts and Moreels.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage response; DNA double strand break; cell cycle; cellular senescence; dental stem cell; low dose radiation exposure

Year:  2021        PMID: 33692980      PMCID: PMC7939020          DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.584484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Public Health        ISSN: 2296-2565


  84 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Trials With Mesenchymal Stem Cells: An Update.

Authors:  Tiziana Squillaro; Gianfranco Peluso; Umberto Galderisi
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 2.  Stem cells, ageing and the quest for immortality.

Authors:  Thomas A Rando
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Characterization of the apical papilla and its residing stem cells from human immature permanent teeth: a pilot study.

Authors:  Wataru Sonoyama; Yi Liu; Takayoshi Yamaza; Rocky S Tuan; Songlin Wang; Songtao Shi; George T-J Huang
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 4.  Hormesis defined.

Authors:  Mark P Mattson
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 10.895

Review 5.  Exposure to low dose ionising radiation: molecular and clinical consequences.

Authors:  Lynn M Martin; Brian Marples; Thomas H Lynch; Donal Hollywood; Laure Marignol
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 6.  DNA double-strand breaks: signaling, repair and the cancer connection.

Authors:  K K Khanna; S P Jackson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 7.  Sensing and repairing DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 8.  gamma-H2AX as protein biomarker for radiation exposure.

Authors:  Kai Rothkamm; Simon Horn
Journal:  Ann Ist Super Sanita       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.663

Review 9.  Molecular mechanisms of low dose ionizing radiation-induced hormesis, adaptive responses, radioresistance, bystander effects, and genomic instability.

Authors:  Feng Ru Tang; Weng Keong Loke
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 2.694

10.  Higher Initial DNA Damage and Persistent Cell Cycle Arrest after Carbon Ion Irradiation Compared to X-irradiation in Prostate and Colon Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Annelies Suetens; Katrien Konings; Marjan Moreels; Roel Quintens; Mieke Verslegers; Els Soors; Kevin Tabury; Vincent Grégoire; Sarah Baatout
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 6.244

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned?

Authors:  Niels Belmans; Anne Caroline Oenning; Benjamin Salmon; Bjorn Baselet; Kevin Tabury; Stéphane Lucas; Ivo Lambrichts; Marjan Moreels; Reinhilde Jacobs; Sarah Baatout
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.525

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.