Literature DB >> 33692730

A Brief Online and Offline (Paper-and-Pencil) Screening Tool for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: The Final Phase in the Development and Validation of the Mental Health Screening Tool for Anxiety Disorders (MHS: A).

Shin-Hyang Kim1,2, Kiho Park1,2, Seowon Yoon1, Younyoung Choi3, Seung-Hwan Lee4, Kee-Hong Choi1,2.   

Abstract

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) can cause significant socioeconomic burden and daily life dysfunction; hence, therapeutic intervention through early detection is important. This study was the final stage of a 3-year anxiety screening tool development project that evaluated the psychometric properties and diagnostic screening utility of the Mental Health Screening Tool for Anxiety Disorders (MHS: A), which measures GAD. A total of 527 Koreans completed online and offline (i.e., paper-and pencil) versions of the MHS: A, Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ). The participants had an average age of 38.6 years and included 340 (64.5%) females. Participants were also administered the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). Internal consistency, convergent/criterion validity, item characteristics, and test information were assessed based on the item response theory (IRT), and a factor analysis and cut-off score analyses were conducted. The MHS: A had good internal consistency and good convergent validity with other anxiety scales. The two versions (online/offline) of the MHS: A were nearly identical (r = 0.908). It had a one-factor structure and showed better diagnostic accuracy (online/offline: sensitivity = 0.98/0.90, specificity = 0.80/0.83) for GAD detection than the GAD-7 and BAI. The IRT analysis indicated that the MHS: A was most informative as a screening tool for GAD. The MHS: A can serve as a clinically useful screening tool for GAD in Korea. Furthermore, it can be administered both online and offline and can be flexibly used as a brief mental health screener, especially with the current rise in telehealth.
Copyright © 2021 Kim, Park, Yoon, Choi, Lee and Choi.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diagnostic utility; generalized anxiety disorder; item response theory; online assessment; psychometrics; screening tests

Year:  2021        PMID: 33692730      PMCID: PMC7937919          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.639366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  3 in total

1.  The Multi-Sites Trial on the Effects of Therapeutic Gardening on Mental Health and Well-Being.

Authors:  Yeji Yang; Eunbin Ro; Taek-Joo Lee; Byung-Chul An; Kwang-Pyo Hong; Ho-Jun Yun; Eun-Yeong Park; Hye-Ryeong Cho; Suk-Young Yun; Miok Park; Young-Jo Yun; Ai-Ran Lee; Jeong-Ill Jeon; Songhie Jung; Tai-Hyeon Ahn; Hye-Young Jin; Kyung Ju Lee; Kee-Hong Choi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 2.  The Current State and Validity of Digital Assessment Tools for Psychiatry: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nayra A Martin-Key; Benedetta Spadaro; Erin Funnell; Eleanor Jane Barker; Thea Sofie Schei; Jakub Tomasik; Sabine Bahn
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2022-03-30

3.  Investigating how individual differences influence responses to the COVID-19 crisis: The role of maladaptive and five-factor personality traits.

Authors:  Yeoul Han; Jihee Jang; Eunsil Cho; Kee-Hong Choi
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2021-02-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.