Literature DB >> 33692603

Does Rattling Deter? The Case of Domestic Dogs.

Nancy G Caine1, Rita Muñoz1, Michele M Mulholland1,2.   

Abstract

Although the rattling of rattlesnakes (Crotalus and Sistrurus) is widely accepted as being aposematic, the hypothesis that rattling deters approach from the snake's potentially dangerous adversaries has not been well tested. In a controlled study using rattling recorded from captive rattlesnakes (C. oreganus helleri) and a variety of comparison sounds or no-sound controls, domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) showed no hesitation to approach camouflaged speakers projecting the recorded rattles. The dogs were equally likely to approach speakers projecting rattling as they were to approach speakers playing control sounds, or speakers that were silent. Furthermore, the dogs spent no less time in front of the speakers projecting the rattles than they did in front of speakers projecting control sounds or no sound. The dogs' reactions may not be representative of other species with whom rattlesnakes come into contact, but the data suggest a need for some circumspection about the role of rattling in the rattlesnake's defensive repertoire. Our results also suggest that dogs may be vulnerable to envenomation because they fail to react to the sound of rattling with avoidance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canis; Crotalus; aposematic; deimatic; envenomation; rattles; rattlesnake

Year:  2019        PMID: 33692603      PMCID: PMC7938867          DOI: 10.1111/eth.13000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ethology        ISSN: 0179-1613            Impact factor:   1.897


  13 in total

Review 1.  Snake bite: pit vipers.

Authors:  Michael E Peterson
Journal:  Clin Tech Small Anim Pract       Date:  2006-11

Review 2.  Deimatism: a neglected component of antipredator defence.

Authors:  Kate D L Umbers; Sebastiano De Bona; Thomas E White; Jussi Lehtonen; Johanna Mappes; John A Endler
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 3.  The evolutionary basis for the feeding behavior of domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and cats (Felis catus).

Authors:  John W S Bradshaw
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Assessment of rattlesnake dangerousness by California ground squirrels: exploitation of cues from rattling sounds.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Dogs turn left to emotional stimuli.

Authors:  Marcello Siniscalchi; Raffaella Sasso; Anna Maria Pepe; Giorgio Vallortigara; Angelo Quaranta
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Behavioral and life history responses of eastern massasauga rattlesnakes (Sistrurus catenatus catenatus) to human disturbance.

Authors:  C Parent; P J Weatherhead
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  272 cases of rattlesnake envenomation in dogs: Demographics and treatment including safety of F(ab')2 antivenom use in 236 patients.

Authors:  Amanda J Witsil; Raegan J Wells; Craig Woods; Sangeeta Rao
Journal:  Toxicon       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.033

8.  Black Bear Reactions to Venomous and Non-venomous Snakes in Eastern North America.

Authors:  Lynn L Rogers; Susan A Mansfield; Kathleen Hornby; Stewart Hornby; Terry D Debruyn; Malvin Mize; Rulon Clark; Gordon M Burghardt
Journal:  Ethology       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 1.897

9.  Ancient European dog genomes reveal continuity since the Early Neolithic.

Authors:  Laura R Botigué; Shiya Song; Amelie Scheu; Shyamalika Gopalan; Amanda L Pendleton; Matthew Oetjens; Angela M Taravella; Timo Seregély; Andrea Zeeb-Lanz; Rose-Marie Arbogast; Dean Bobo; Kevin Daly; Martina Unterländer; Joachim Burger; Jeffrey M Kidd; Krishna R Veeramah
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Testing the feasibility of the startle-first route to deimatism.

Authors:  Grace G Holmes; Emeline Delferrière; Candy Rowe; Jolyon Troscianko; John Skelhorn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.