Literature DB >> 33692395

Screening pregnant women in a high-risk population with WHO-2013 or NICE diagnostic criteria does not affect the prevalence of gestational diabetes.

Mohammed Bashir1,2, Ibrahim Ibrahim3, Fatin Eltaher4, Stephen Beer5,6, Khaled Baagar5,4, Mahmoud Aboulfotouh4, Justin C Konje3, Abdul-Badi Abou-Samra5.   

Abstract

There are currently several diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes (GDM). Both the WHO -2013 and NICE diagnose GDM based on a single step 75 g OGT; however; each uses different glucose thresholds. Previous studies have shown that the prevalence of GDM using the NICE criteria (GDM-N) is lower than that using the WHO-2013 criteria (GDM-W). Qatar has national diabetes in pregnancy program in which all pregnant women undergo OGTT screening using the WHO-2013 criteria. This study aims to define the prevalence of GDM using both criteria in a high-risk population. This retrospective study included 2000 women who underwent a 75 g (OGTT) between Jan 2016 and Apr 2016 and excluded patients with known pre-conception diabetes, multiple pregnancy, and those who did not complete the OGTT. We then classified the women into GDM-W positive, GDM-N positive but GDM-W negative, and normal glucose tolerance (NGT) population. A total of 1481 women (74%) had NGT using the NICE or the WHO-2013 criteria. The number of patients who met both criteria was 279 subjects (14%) with a good agreement (Kappa coefficient 0.67, p < 0.001). The NICE and the WHO-2013 criteria were discordant in 240 subjects (12% of the cohort); 6.7% met the WHO -2013 criteria only and only 5.3% met the NICE criteria. The frequency of pre-eclampsia, pre-term delivery, Caesarean-section, LGA and neonatal ICU admissions were significantly increased in the GDM-W group. However, the GDM-N positive but GDM-W negative had no increased risk of maternal or fetal complications apart from pregnancy-induced hypertension. The WHO-2013 and the NICE criteria classified a similar proportion of pregnant women, 21.5% and 20.1%, respectively, as having GDM; however, they were concordant in only 14% of the cases. Women who are GDM-N positive but GDM-W negative are not at increased risk of maternal and fetal pregnancy complications, except for pregnancy-induced hypertension. As the NICE criteria are more specific to the UK population, we would recommend the use of the WHO-2013 criteria to diagnose GDM in the MENA region and possibly other regions that do not have the same set-up as the UK.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33692395      PMCID: PMC7946879          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84918-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  19 in total

1.  Impact of the new IADPSG gestational diabetes diagnostic criteria on pregnancy outcomes in Western Australia.

Authors:  Aminath Laafira; Scott W White; Christopher J Griffin; Dorothy Graham
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 2.100

2.  Prevalence and pregnancy outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus by different international diagnostic criteria: a prospective cohort study in Vietnam.

Authors:  Cong Luat Nguyen; Andy H Lee; Ngoc Minh Pham; Phung Thi Hoang Nguyen; Anh Vo Van Ha; Tan Khac Chu; Dat Van Duong; Hong Thi Duong; Colin W Binns
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2019-03-07

3.  Comparison of criteria of International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Sushila Todi; Haritha Sagili; Sadish Kumar Kamalanathan
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in a South African population: Prevalence, comparison of diagnostic criteria and the role of risk factors.

Authors:  Sumaiya Adam; Paul Rheeder
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  2017-05-24

5.  Appropriate Timing of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosis in Medium- and Low-Risk Women: Effectiveness of the Italian NHS Recommendations in Preventing Fetal Macrosomia.

Authors:  Paola Quaresima; Federica Visconti; Eusebio Chiefari; Maria Mirabelli; Massimo Borelli; Patrizia Caroleo; Daniela Foti; Luigi Puccio; Roberta Venturella; Costantino Di Carlo; Antonio Brunetti
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 4.011

6.  Metformin-treated-GDM has lower risk of macrosomia compared to diet-treated GDM- a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mohammed Bashir; Mahmoud Aboulfotouh; Zeinab Dabbous; Marwa Mokhtar; Mashhood Siddique; Ramy Wahba; Amin Ibrahim; Sanam Al-Houda Brich; Justin C Konje; Abdul-Badi Abou-Samra
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2019-01-06

7.  Gestational diabetes among Saudi women: prevalence, risk factors and pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Eman Mohammed Alfadhli; Eman Naguib Osman; Taghreed Hamza Basri; Nazneen Sameer Mansuri; Magda Hassanein Youssef; Somayah Ahmed Assaaedi; Bushra Awad Aljohani
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.526

8.  Prevalence and risk factors of gestational diabetes mellitus among pregnant patients visiting National Guard primary health care centers in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Saleem A Alsaedi; Abdullah A Altalhi; Mutaz F Nabrawi; Abdulrahman A Aldainy; Razaz M Wali
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.484

9.  Prevalence of newly detected diabetes in pregnancy in Qatar, using universal screening.

Authors:  Mohammed Bashir; Manar E Abdel-Rahman; Mahmoud Aboulfotouh; Fatin Eltaher; Khalid Omar; Isaac Babarinsa; Kwabena Appiah-Sakyi; Tarek Sharaf; Eman Azzam; Mohammad Abukhalil; Malika Boumedjane; Wigdan Yousif; Warda Ahmed; Sadaf Khan; Justin C Konje; Abdul-Badi Abou-Samra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Diabetes and pregnancy: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Ian Blumer; Eran Hadar; David R Hadden; Lois Jovanovič; Jorge H Mestman; M Hassan Murad; Yariv Yogev
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.958

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes in preCOVID-19 and COVID-19 Years and Its Impact on Pregnancy: A 5-Year Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Sorina Chelu; Elena Bernad; Marius Craina; Radu Neamtu; Adelina Geanina Mocanu; Corina Vernic; Veronica Daniela Chiriac; Larisa Tomescu; Claudia Borza
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-16

2.  Gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wenrui Ye; Cong Luo; Jing Huang; Chenglong Li; Zhixiong Liu; Fangkun Liu
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2022-05-25

3.  Continuous glucose monitoring system profile of women diagnosed as gestational diabetes mellitus by International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria and labeled as normoglycemic by alternate criteria in early pregnancy.

Authors:  Yashdeep Gupta; Charandeep Singh; Alpesh Goyal; Kalaivani Mani; Juhi Bharti; Seema Singhal; Garima Kachhawa; Vidushi Kulshrestha; Rajesh Kumari; Reeta Mahey; Jai B Sharma; Neena Malhotra; Neerja Bhatla; Rajesh Khadgawat; Nikhil Tandon
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.681

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.