Camille Sottas1, Lucie Schmiedová2, Jakub Kreisinger2, Tomáš Albrecht2,3, Jiří Reif4,5, Tomasz S Osiejuk6, Radka Reifová2. 1. Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 44, Prague, Czech Republic. camille.sottas@gmail.com. 2. Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 44, Prague, Czech Republic. 3. Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Květná 8, Brno, 603 65, Czech Republic. 4. Faculty of Science, Institute for Environmental Studies, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. 5. Department of Zoology and Laboratory of Ornithology, Faculty of Science, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic. 6. Department of Behavioural Ecology, Institute of Environmental Biology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It has been proposed that divergence in the gut microbiota composition between incipient species could contribute to their reproductive isolation. Nevertheless, empirical evidence for the role of gut microbiota in speciation is scarce. Moreover, it is still largely unknown to what extent closely related species in the early stages of speciation differ in their gut microbiota composition, especially in non-mammalian taxa, and which factors drive the divergence. Here we analysed the gut microbiota in two closely related passerine species, the common nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos) and the thrush nightingale (Luscinia luscinia). The ranges of these two species overlap in a secondary contact zone, where both species occasionally hybridize and where interspecific competition has resulted in habitat use differentiation. RESULTS: We analysed the gut microbiota from the proximal, middle and distal part of the small intestine in both sympatric and allopatric populations of the two nightingale species using sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA. We found small but significant differences in the microbiota composition among the three gut sections. However, the gut microbiota composition in the two nightingale species did not differ significantly between either sympatric or allopatric populations. Most of the observed variation in the gut microbiota composition was explained by inter-individual differences. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to assess the potential role of the gut microbiota in bird speciation. Our results suggest that neither habitat use, nor geographical distance, nor species identity have strong influence on the nightingale gut microbiota composition. This suggests that changes in the gut microbiota composition are unlikely to contribute to reproductive isolation in these passerine birds.
BACKGROUND: It has been proposed that divergence in the gut microbiota composition between incipient species could contribute to their reproductive isolation. Nevertheless, empirical evidence for the role of gut microbiota in speciation is scarce. Moreover, it is still largely unknown to what extent closely related species in the early stages of speciation differ in their gut microbiota composition, especially in non-mammalian taxa, and which factors drive the divergence. Here we analysed the gut microbiota in two closely related passerine species, the common nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos) and the thrush nightingale (Luscinia luscinia). The ranges of these two species overlap in a secondary contact zone, where both species occasionally hybridize and where interspecific competition has resulted in habitat use differentiation. RESULTS: We analysed the gut microbiota from the proximal, middle and distal part of the small intestine in both sympatric and allopatric populations of the two nightingale species using sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA. We found small but significant differences in the microbiota composition among the three gut sections. However, the gut microbiota composition in the two nightingale species did not differ significantly between either sympatric or allopatric populations. Most of the observed variation in the gut microbiota composition was explained by inter-individual differences. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to assess the potential role of the gut microbiota in bird speciation. Our results suggest that neither habitat use, nor geographical distance, nor species identity have strong influence on the nightingale gut microbiota composition. This suggests that changes in the gut microbiota composition are unlikely to contribute to reproductive isolation in these passerine birds.
Entities:
Keywords:
Diet; Gut microbiome; Habitat use; Luscinia; Passerines; Reproductive isolation
Authors: Andrew H Moeller; Taichi A Suzuki; Dana Lin; Eileen A Lacey; Samuel K Wasser; Michael W Nachman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-12-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Anna Klindworth; Elmar Pruesse; Timmy Schweer; Jörg Peplies; Christian Quast; Matthias Horn; Frank Oliver Glöckner Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2012-08-28 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Amelia R I Lindsey; Danny W Rice; Sarah R Bordenstein; Andrew W Brooks; Seth R Bordenstein; Irene L G Newton Journal: Genome Biol Evol Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 3.416
Authors: Nicholas D Youngblut; Georg H Reischer; William Walters; Nathalie Schuster; Chris Walzer; Gabrielle Stalder; Ruth E Ley; Andreas H Farnleitner Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2019-05-16 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Mauricio Hernández; Sergio Ancona; Aníbal H Díaz De La Vega-Pérez; Ligia C Muñoz-Arenas; Stephanie E Hereira-Pacheco; Yendi E Navarro-Noya Journal: Microbes Environ Date: 2022 Impact factor: 2.596