Amy Lowry Warnock1, Carrie Dooyema1, Heidi M Blanck1, Seung Hee Lee1, Kelly Hall2, Nora Geary3, Deborah A Galuska1. 1. Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. 2. Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN, USA. 3. McKing Consulting Corporation, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Abstract
Background: Obesity remains a significant public health issue in the United States. Each week, millions of infants and children are cared for in early care and education (ECE) programs, making it an important setting for building healthy habits. Since 2010, 39 states promulgated licensing regulations impacting infant feeding, nutrition, physical activity, or screen time practices. We assessed trends in ECE regulations across all 50 states and the District of Columbia (D.C.) and hypothesized that states included more obesity prevention standards over time. Methods: We analyzed published ratings of state licensing regulations (2010-2018) and describe trends in uptake of 47 high-impact standards derived from Caring for Our Children's, Preventing Childhood Obesity special collection. National trends are described by (1) care type (Centers, Large Care Homes, and Small Care Homes); (2) state and U.S. region; and (3) most and least supported standards. Results: Center regulations included the most obesity prevention standards (∼13% in 2010 vs. ∼29% in 2018) compared with other care types, and infant feeding and nutrition standards were most often included, while physical activity and screen time were least supported. Some states saw significant improvements in uptake, with six states and D.C. having a 30%-point increase 2010-2018. Conclusions: Nationally, there were consistent increases in the percentage of obesity prevention standards included in ECE licensing regulations. Future studies may examine facilitators and barriers to the uptake of obesity prevention standards and identify pathways by which public health and health care professionals can act as a resource and promote obesity prevention in ECE.
Background: Obesity remains a significant public health issue in the United States. Each week, millions of infants and children are cared for in early care and education (ECE) programs, making it an important setting for building healthy habits. Since 2010, 39 states promulgated licensing regulations impacting infant feeding, nutrition, physical activity, or screen time practices. We assessed trends in ECE regulations across all 50 states and the District of Columbia (D.C.) and hypothesized that states included more obesity prevention standards over time. Methods: We analyzed published ratings of state licensing regulations (2010-2018) and describe trends in uptake of 47 high-impact standards derived from Caring for Our Children's, Preventing Childhood Obesity special collection. National trends are described by (1) care type (Centers, Large Care Homes, and Small Care Homes); (2) state and U.S. region; and (3) most and least supported standards. Results: Center regulations included the most obesity prevention standards (∼13% in 2010 vs. ∼29% in 2018) compared with other care types, and infant feeding and nutrition standards were most often included, while physical activity and screen time were least supported. Some states saw significant improvements in uptake, with six states and D.C. having a 30%-point increase 2010-2018. Conclusions: Nationally, there were consistent increases in the percentage of obesity prevention standards included in ECE licensing regulations. Future studies may examine facilitators and barriers to the uptake of obesity prevention standards and identify pathways by which public health and health care professionals can act as a resource and promote obesity prevention in ECE.
Entities:
Keywords:
National Policy Surveillance; child care; early care and education; obesity prevention; state licensing regulations
Authors: Meredith A Reynolds; Caree Jackson Cotwright; Barbara Polhamus; Allison Gertel-Rosenberg; Debbie Chang Journal: J Law Med Ethics Date: 2013 Impact factor: 1.718
Authors: Robert L Stephens; Ye Xu; Catherine A Lesesne; Lillian Dunn; Jakub Kakietek; Jan Jernigan; Laura Kettel Khan Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Tala H Fakhouri; Craig M Hales; Cheryl D Fryar; Xianfen Li; David S Freedman Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2018-02-16 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Nilda Graciela Cosco; Nancy M Wells; Muntazar Monsur; Lora Suzanne Goodell; Daowen Zhang; Tong Xu; Derek Hales; Robin Clive Moore Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-10 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Julie E Hoover-Fong; Kerry J Schulze; Adekemi Y Alade; Michael B Bober; Ethan Gough; S Shahrukh Hashmi; Jacqueline T Hecht; Janet M Legare; Mary Ellen Little; Peggy Modaff; Richard M Pauli; David F Rodriguez-Buritica; Maria E Serna; Cory Smid; Chengxin Liu; John McGready Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis Date: 2021-12-23 Impact factor: 4.123