Literature DB >> 33690987

Intrathecal pain management with ziconotide: Time for consensus?

Georgios Matis1, Pasquale De Negri2, Denis Dupoiron3, Rudolf Likar4, Xander Zuidema5, Dirk Rasche6.   

Abstract

This article summarizes recommendations made by six pain specialists who discussed the rationale for ziconotide intrathecal analgesia (ITA) and the requirement for evidence-based guidance on its use, from a European perspective. Riemser Pharma GmbH (Greifswald, Germany), which holds the European marketing authorization for ziconotide, hosted the meeting. The group agreed that ITA is under-used in Europe, adding that ziconotide ITA has potential to be a first-line alternative to morphine; both are already first-line options in the USA. Ziconotide ITA (initiated using a low-dose, slow-titration approach) is suitable for many patients with noncancer- or cancer-related chronic refractory pain and no history of psychosis. Adopting ziconotide as first-line ITA could reduce opioid usage in these patient populations. The group advocated a risk-reduction strategy for all candidate patients, including compulsory prescreening for neuropsychosis, and requested US-European alignment of the licensed starting dose for ziconotide: the low-and-slow approach practiced in the USA has a better tolerability profile than the fixed high starting dose licensed in Europe. Of note, an update to the European Summary of Product Characteristics is anticipated in early 2021. The group acknowledged that the Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC) treatment algorithms for ziconotide ITA provide useful guidance, but recommendations tailored specifically for European settings are required. Before a consensus process can formally begin, the group called for additional European prospective studies to investigate ziconotide in low-and-slow dosing strategies, in different patient settings. Such data would enable European guidance to have the most appropriate evidence at its core.
© 2021 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer pain; chronic pain; consensus; intrathecal therapy; pain management; ziconotide

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33690987      PMCID: PMC7943290          DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav            Impact factor:   2.708


  43 in total

1.  Ziconotide for treatment of severe chronic pain.

Authors:  Achim Schmidtko; Jörn Lötsch; Rainer Freynhagen; Gerd Geisslinger
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Ziconotide--a novel neuron-specific calcium channel blocker for the intrathecal treatment of severe chronic pain--a short review.

Authors:  U Klotz
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.366

3.  Ziconotide for spinal cord injury-related pain.

Authors:  Andrei Brinzeu; Julien Berthiller; Jean-Bernard Caillet; Helene Staquet; Patrick Mertens
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.931

4.  Effectiveness and Safety of Intrathecal Ziconotide: Interim Analysis of the Patient Registry of Intrathecal Ziconotide Management (PRIZM).

Authors:  Timothy Deer; Richard L Rauck; Philip Kim; Michael F Saulino; Mark Wallace; Eric J Grigsby; I-Zu Huang; Fannie Mori; Geertrui F Vanhove; Gladstone C McDowell
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 5.  Do the potential benefits outweigh the risks? An update on the use of ziconotide in clinical practice.

Authors:  E Bäckryd
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.931

6.  Italian registry on long-term intrathecal ziconotide treatment.

Authors:  William Raffaeli; Donatella Sarti; Laura Demartini; Alberto Sotgiu; Cesare Bonezzi
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of intrathecal ziconotide in adults with severe chronic pain.

Authors:  Richard L Rauck; Mark S Wallace; Michael S Leong; Michael Minehart; Lynn R Webster; Steven G Charapata; Jacob E Abraham; Daniel E Buffington; David Ellis; Ronald Kartzinel
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.612

8.  Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference 2012: recommendations for the management of pain by intrathecal (intraspinal) drug delivery: report of an interdisciplinary expert panel.

Authors:  Timothy R Deer; Joshua Prager; Robert Levy; James Rathmell; Eric Buchser; Allen Burton; David Caraway; Michael Cousins; José De Andrés; Sudhir Diwan; Michael Erdek; Eric Grigsby; Marc Huntoon; Marilyn S Jacobs; Philip Kim; Krishna Kumar; Michael Leong; Liong Liem; Gladstone C McDowell; Sunil Panchal; Richard Rauck; Michael Saulino; B Todd Sitzman; Peter Staats; Michael Stanton-Hicks; Lisa Stearns; Mark Wallace; K Dean Willis; William Witt; Tony Yaksh; Nagy Mekhail
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2012-07-02

9.  Safety and efficacy of intrathecal ziconotide in the management of severe chronic pain.

Authors:  Howard S Smith; Timothy R Deer
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 10.  Best practices for intrathecal drug delivery for pain.

Authors:  Joshua Prager; Timothy Deer; Robert Levy; Brian Bruel; Eric Buchser; David Caraway; Michael Cousins; Marilyn Jacobs; Gail McGlothlen; Richard Rauck; Peter Staats; Lisa Stearns
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2014-01-21
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Peripheral Voltage-Gated Cation Channels in Neuropathic Pain and Their Potential as Therapeutic Targets.

Authors:  Sascha R A Alles; Peter A Smith
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-13

Review 2.  Marine Natural Products in Clinical Use.

Authors:  Neshatul Haque; Sana Parveen; Tingting Tang; Jiaen Wei; Zunnan Huang
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 6.085

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.