Literature DB >> 33689627

Clinical outcomes of the Centre for Eye Health: an intra-professional optometry-led collaborative eye care clinic in Australia.

Henrietta Wang1,2, Michael Kalloniatis1,2.   

Abstract

Clinical relevance: This novel clinical model is the first of its kind in Australia and was designed to help reduce unnecessary referrals into overburdened public systems by utilising pre-existing community-based resources.Background: The Centre for Eye Health (CFEH) is an intra-professional optometry-led care clinic offering an alternative pathway to traditional ophthalmology-based pathways (public hospital clinics or private practices) for 'at-risk' patients requiring ocular imaging, diagnostic and management services. This study evaluates the CFEH integrated eye-care model in the identification of chronic eye diseases within the community.
Methods: A retrospective random clinical audit of over 750 medical records of patients referred to the CFEH between July 2016 and June 2019 was conducted. Demographics of patients, referral type, final diagnosis and recommended management plans were extracted from this subset. Clinic key performance indicators (referral turnaround time, and net cost per patient appointment) were also extracted.
Results: Of the 755 referrals associated with the audited records, 77.4% resulted in the identification of patients with or at-risk of developing eye diseases with 73.5% of this cohort requiring ongoing monitoring at CFEH or referral to ophthalmology. Although the CFEH model is not designed to diagnose or manage acute conditions, 1.5% of patients in this pathway required same day ophthalmological or medical intervention. The cost per patient was equivalent to hospital eye departments costs.
Conclusion: This integrated care pathway has the potential to reduce unnecessary referrals from optometrists to hospital ophthalmological service by offering a safe and effective alternate pathway. The majority of patients seen within this pathway were able to be monitored within optometry-led services. This is a unique clinical model utilising inter-professional referrals within optometry which has the potential to reduce preventable blindness within the community through the early detection of eye diseases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical pathways; collaborative care; eye diseases; integrated care model; optometry

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33689627     DOI: 10.1080/08164622.2021.1878821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Optom        ISSN: 0816-4622            Impact factor:   3.143


  7 in total

1.  High-Density Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis Provides Insights Into Early/Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration Retinal Layer Changes.

Authors:  Matt Trinh; Michael Kalloniatis; David Alonso-Caneiro; Lisa Nivison-Smith
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 4.925

2.  Reticular Pseudodrusen Are Associated With More Advanced Para-Central Photoreceptor Degeneration in Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Authors:  Matt Trinh; Natalie Eshow; David Alonso-Caneiro; Michael Kalloniatis; Lisa Nivison-Smith
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.925

3.  Radial Peripapillary Capillary Plexus Sparing and Underlying Retinal Vascular Impairment in Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Authors:  Matt Trinh; Michael Kalloniatis; Lisa Nivison-Smith
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Glaucoma Suspects: The Impact of Risk Factor-Driven Review Periods on Clinical Load, Diagnoses, and Healthcare Costs.

Authors:  Jack Phu; Katherine Masselos; Michael Sullivan-Mee; Michael Kalloniatis
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  The Frontloading Fields Study (FFS): Detecting Changes in Mean Deviation in Glaucoma Using Multiple Visual Field Tests Per Clinical Visit.

Authors:  Jack Phu; Michael Kalloniatis
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.283

6.  The Frontloading Fields Study: The Impact of False Positives and Seeding Point Errors on Visual Field Reliability When Using SITA-Faster.

Authors:  Jack Phu; Michael Kalloniatis
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Gaze tracker parameters have little association with visual field metrics of intrasession frontloaded SITA-Faster 24-2 visual field results.

Authors:  Jack Phu; Michael Kalloniatis
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2022-05-22       Impact factor: 3.992

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.