Background: Studies of closed-loop control (CLC) in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) consistently demonstrate improvements in glycemic control as measured by increased time-in-range (TIR) 70-180 mg/dL. However, clinical predictors of TIR in users of CLC systems are needed. Materials and Methods: We analyzed data from 100 children aged 6-13 years with T1D using the Tandem Control-IQ CLC system during a randomized trial or subsequent extension phase. Continuous glucose monitor data were collected at baseline and during 12-16 weeks of CLC use. Participants were stratified into quartiles of TIR on CLC to compare clinical characteristics. Results: TIR for those in the first, second, third, and fourth quartiles was 54%, 65%, 71%, and 78%, respectively. Lower baseline TIR was associated with lower TIR on CLC (r = 0.69, P < 0.001). However, lower baseline TIR was also associated with greater improvement in TIR on CLC (r = -0.81, P < 0.001). During CLC, participants in the highest versus lowest TIR-quartile administered more user-initiated boluses daily (8.5 ± 2.8 vs. 5.8 ± 2.6, P < 0.001) and received fewer automated boluses (3.5 ± 1.0 vs. 6.0 ± 1.6, P < 0.001). Participants in the lowest (vs. the highest) TIR-quartile received more insulin per body weight (1.13 ± 0.27 vs. 0.87 ± 0.20 U/kg/d, P = 0.008). However, in a multivariate model adjusting for baseline TIR, user-initiated boluses and insulin-per-body-weight were no longer significant. Conclusions: Higher baseline TIR is the strongest predictor of TIR on CLC in children with T1D. However, lower baseline TIR is associated with the greatest improvement in TIR. As with open-loop systems, user engagement is important for optimal glycemic control.
Background: Studies of closed-loop control (CLC) in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) consistently demonstrate improvements in glycemic control as measured by increased time-in-range (TIR) 70-180 mg/dL. However, clinical predictors of TIR in users of CLC systems are needed. Materials and Methods: We analyzed data from 100 children aged 6-13 years with T1D using the Tandem Control-IQ CLC system during a randomized trial or subsequent extension phase. Continuous glucose monitor data were collected at baseline and during 12-16 weeks of CLC use. Participants were stratified into quartiles of TIR on CLC to compare clinical characteristics. Results: TIR for those in the first, second, third, and fourth quartiles was 54%, 65%, 71%, and 78%, respectively. Lower baseline TIR was associated with lower TIR on CLC (r = 0.69, P < 0.001). However, lower baseline TIR was also associated with greater improvement in TIR on CLC (r = -0.81, P < 0.001). During CLC, participants in the highest versus lowest TIR-quartile administered more user-initiated boluses daily (8.5 ± 2.8 vs. 5.8 ± 2.6, P < 0.001) and received fewer automated boluses (3.5 ± 1.0 vs. 6.0 ± 1.6, P < 0.001). Participants in the lowest (vs. the highest) TIR-quartile received more insulin per body weight (1.13 ± 0.27 vs. 0.87 ± 0.20 U/kg/d, P = 0.008). However, in a multivariate model adjusting for baseline TIR, user-initiated boluses and insulin-per-body-weight were no longer significant. Conclusions: Higher baseline TIR is the strongest predictor of TIR on CLC in children with T1D. However, lower baseline TIR is associated with the greatest improvement in TIR. As with open-loop systems, user engagement is important for optimal glycemic control.
Entities:
Keywords:
Closed-loop systems; Insulin pump; Time-in-range; Type 1 diabetes
Authors: Sue A Brown; Boris P Kovatchev; Dan Raghinaru; John W Lum; Bruce A Buckingham; Yogish C Kudva; Lori M Laffel; Carol J Levy; Jordan E Pinsker; R Paul Wadwa; Eyal Dassau; Francis J Doyle; Stacey M Anderson; Mei Mei Church; Vikash Dadlani; Laya Ekhlaspour; Gregory P Forlenza; Elvira Isganaitis; David W Lam; Craig Kollman; Roy W Beck Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-10-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Richard M Bergenstal; Satish Garg; Stuart A Weinzimer; Bruce A Buckingham; Bruce W Bode; William V Tamborlane; Francine R Kaufman Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-10-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Nicole C Foster; Roy W Beck; Kellee M Miller; Mark A Clements; Michael R Rickels; Linda A DiMeglio; David M Maahs; William V Tamborlane; Richard Bergenstal; Elizabeth Smith; Beth A Olson; Satish K Garg Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2019-01-18 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: Steven J Russell; Firas H El-Khatib; Manasi Sinha; Kendra L Magyar; Katherine McKeon; Laura G Goergen; Courtney Balliro; Mallory A Hillard; David M Nathan; Edward R Damiano Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-06-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Eva Tomás; Yen-Shou Lin; Zeina Dagher; Asish Saha; Zhijun Luo; Yasuo Ido; Neil B Ruderman Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Lori M Laffel; Lauren G Kanapka; Roy W Beck; Katherine Bergamo; Mark A Clements; Amy Criego; Daniel J DeSalvo; Robin Goland; Korey Hood; David Liljenquist; Laurel H Messer; Roshanak Monzavi; Thomas J Mouse; Priya Prahalad; Jennifer Sherr; Jill H Simmons; R Paul Wadwa; Ruth S Weinstock; Steven M Willi; Kellee M Miller Journal: JAMA Date: 2020-06-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Marc D Breton; Lauren G Kanapka; Roy W Beck; Laya Ekhlaspour; Gregory P Forlenza; Eda Cengiz; Melissa Schoelwer; Katrina J Ruedy; Emily Jost; Lori Carria; Emma Emory; Liana J Hsu; Mary Oliveri; Craig C Kollman; Betsy B Dokken; Stuart A Weinzimer; Mark D DeBoer; Bruce A Buckingham; Daniel Cherñavvsky; R Paul Wadwa Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2020-08-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: H Thabit; M Tauschmann; J M Allen; L Leelarathna; S Hartnell; M E Wilinska; C L Acerini; S Dellweg; C Benesch; L Heinemann; J K Mader; M Holzer; H Kojzar; J Exall; J Yong; J Pichierri; K D Barnard; C Kollman; P Cheng; P C Hindmarsh; F M Campbell; S Arnolds; T R Pieber; M L Evans; D B Dunger; R Hovorka Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-09-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lauren G Kanapka; R Paul Wadwa; Marc D Breton; Katrina J Ruedy; Laya Ekhlaspour; Gregory P Forlenza; Eda Cengiz; Melissa J Schoelwer; Emily Jost; Lori Carria; Emma Emory; Liana J Hsu; Stuart A Weinzimer; Mark D DeBoer; Bruce A Buckingham; Mary Oliveri; Craig Kollman; Betsy B Dokken; Daniel Cherñavvsky; Roy W Beck Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2020-12-21 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Tadej Battelino; Thomas Danne; Richard M Bergenstal; Stephanie A Amiel; Roy Beck; Torben Biester; Emanuele Bosi; Bruce A Buckingham; William T Cefalu; Kelly L Close; Claudio Cobelli; Eyal Dassau; J Hans DeVries; Kim C Donaghue; Klemen Dovc; Francis J Doyle; Satish Garg; George Grunberger; Simon Heller; Lutz Heinemann; Irl B Hirsch; Roman Hovorka; Weiping Jia; Olga Kordonouri; Boris Kovatchev; Aaron Kowalski; Lori Laffel; Brian Levine; Alexander Mayorov; Chantal Mathieu; Helen R Murphy; Revital Nimri; Kirsten Nørgaard; Christopher G Parkin; Eric Renard; David Rodbard; Banshi Saboo; Desmond Schatz; Keaton Stoner; Tatsuiko Urakami; Stuart A Weinzimer; Moshe Phillip Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2019-06-08 Impact factor: 19.112