Literature DB >> 33689287

In Vitro and in Vivo Analyses of the Effects of Source, Length, and Charge on the Cytotoxicity and Immunocompatibility of Cellulose Nanocrystals.

Adam M Weiss1,2, Nicholas Macke2, Yefei Zhang2, Céline Calvino2, Aaron P Esser-Kahn2, Stuart J Rowan1,2,3.   

Abstract

Cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) are an emergent, sustainable nanomaterial that are biosourced, abundant, and biodegradable. On account of their high aspect ratio, low density, and mechanical rigidity, they have been employed in numerous areas of biomedical research including as reinforcing materials for bone or tissue scaffolds or as carriers in drug delivery systems. Given the promise of these materials for such use, characterizing and understanding their interactions with biological systems is an important step to prevent toxicity or inflammation. Reported herein are studies aimed at exploring the in vitro and in vivo effects that the source, length, and charge of the CNCs have on cytotoxicity and immune response. CNCs from four different biosources (cotton, wood, Miscanthus x Giganteus, and sea tunicate) were prepared and functionalized with positive or negative charges to obtain a small library of CNCs with a range of dimensions and surface charge. A method to remove endotoxic or other impurities on the CNC surface leftover from the isolation process was developed, and the biocompatibility of the CNCs was subsequently assayed in vitro and in vivo. After subcutaneous injection, it was found that unfunctionalized (uncharged) CNCs form aggregates at the site of injection, inducing splenomegaly and neutrophil infiltration, while charged CNCs having surface carboxylates, sulfate half-esters, or primary amines were biologically inert. No effect of the particle source or length was observed in the in vitro and in vivo studies conducted. The lack of an in vitro or in vivo immune response toward charged CNCs in these experiments supports their use in future biological studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biocompatibility; biomaterials; cellulose nanocrystals; nanomedicine; tissue scaffolds

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33689287      PMCID: PMC9147985          DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng        ISSN: 2373-9878


  46 in total

1.  Tissue Response and Biodistribution of Injectable Cellulose Nanocrystal Composite Hydrogels.

Authors:  Kevin J De France; Maryam Badv; Jonathan Dorogin; Emily Siebers; Vishrut Panchal; Mouhanad Babi; Jose Moran-Mirabal; Michael Lawlor; Emily D Cranston; Todd Hoare
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2019-05-02

Review 2.  The potential of cellulose nanocrystals in tissue engineering strategies.

Authors:  Rui M A Domingues; Manuela E Gomes; Rui L Reis
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 6.988

3.  Photoluminescent Hybrids of Cellulose Nanocrystals and Carbon Quantum Dots as Cytocompatible Probes for in Vitro Bioimaging.

Authors:  Jiaqi Guo; Dongfei Liu; Ilari Filpponen; Leena-Sisko Johansson; Jani-Markus Malho; Sakeena Quraishi; Falk Liebner; Hélder A Santos; Orlando J Rojas
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 6.988

4.  Immobilization to Positively Charged Cellulose Nanocrystals Enhances the Antibacterial Activity and Stability of Hen Egg White and T4 Lysozyme.

Authors:  Adel Abouhmad; Tarek Dishisha; Magdy A Amin; Rajni Hatti-Kaul
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 6.988

5.  Functionalization density dependence of single-walled carbon nanotubes cytotoxicity in vitro.

Authors:  Christie M Sayes; Feng Liang; Jared L Hudson; Joe Mendez; Wenhua Guo; Jonathan M Beach; Valerie C Moore; Condell D Doyle; Jennifer L West; W Edward Billups; Kevin D Ausman; Vicki L Colvin
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2005-10-17       Impact factor: 4.372

6.  Innate defence functions of macrophages can be biased by nano-sized ceramic and metallic particles.

Authors:  Marilena Lucarelli; Antonietta M Gatti; Graziana Savarino; Paola Quattroni; Lucia Martinelli; Emanuela Monari; Diana Boraschi
Journal:  Eur Cytokine Netw       Date:  2004 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.737

7.  Impacts of chemical modification on the toxicity of diverse nanocellulose materials to developing zebrafish.

Authors:  Bryan J Harper; Alicea Clendaniel; Federico Sinche; Daniel Way; Michael Hughes; Jenna Schardt; John Simonsen; Aleksandr B Stefaniak; Stacey L Harper
Journal:  Cellulose (Lond)       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 5.044

8.  Incorporation of lysozyme into cellulose nanocrystals stabilized β-chitosan nanoparticles with enhanced antibacterial activity.

Authors:  Hongcai Zhang; Miaomiao Feng; Shunsheng Chen; Wenzheng Shi; Xichang Wang
Journal:  Carbohydr Polym       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 9.381

9.  Radiolabeled Molecular Imaging Probes for the In Vivo Evaluation of Cellulose Nanocrystals for Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Surachet Imlimthan; Sofia Otaru; Outi Keinänen; Alexandra Correia; Kalle Lintinen; Hélder A Santos; Anu J Airaksinen; Mauri A Kostiainen; Mirkka Sarparanta
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 6.988

10.  Influence of resveratrol release on the tissue response to mechanically adaptive cortical implants.

Authors:  Jessica K Nguyen; Mehdi Jorfi; Kelly L Buchanan; Daniel J Park; E Johan Foster; Dustin J Tyler; Stuart J Rowan; Christoph Weder; Jeffrey R Capadona
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 8.947

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Immunostimulatory Polymers as Adjuvants, Immunotherapies, and Delivery Systems.

Authors:  Adam M Weiss; Samir Hossainy; Stuart J Rowan; Jeffrey A Hubbell; Aaron P Esser-Kahn
Journal:  Macromolecules       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 6.057

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.