Rupesh Raina1,2, Nirav Agrawal1,3, Kirsten Kusumi2, Avisha Pandey1, Abhishek Tibrewal1, Alexander Botsch4. 1. Akron Nephrology Associates/Cleveland Clinic Akron General Medical Center, Akron, OH, USA. 2. Department of Nephrology, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, OH, USA. 3. Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA. 4. Division of Critical Care Medicine, Summa Health, Akron, OH, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) is the primary therapeutic modality utilized in hemodynamically unstable patients with severe acute kidney injury. As the circuit is extracorporeal, it poses an increased risk of blood clotting and circuit loss; frequent circuit losses affect the provider's ability to provide optimal treatment. The objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the extracorporeal anticoagulants in the pediatric CKRT population. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a literature search on PubMed/Medline and Embase for relevant citations. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they involved patients under the age of 18 years undergoing CKRT, with the use of anticoagulation (heparin, citrate, or prostacyclin) as a part of therapy. Only English articles were included in the study. DATA EXTRACTION: Initial search yielded 58 articles and a total of 24 articles were included and reviewed. A meta-analysis was performed focusing on the safety and effectiveness of regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) vs unfractionated heparin (UFH) anticoagulants in children. DATA SYNTHESIS: RCA had statistically significantly longer circuit life of 50.65 hours vs. UFH of 42.10 hours. Two major adverse effects metabolic alkalosis and electrolyte imbalance seen more commonly in RCA compared to UFH. There was not a significant difference in the risk of systemic bleeding when comparing RCA vs. UFH. CONCLUSION: RCA is the preferred anticoagulant over UFH due to its significantly longer circuit life, although vigilant circuit monitoring is required due to the increased risk of electrolyte disturbances. Prostacyclin was not included in the meta-analysis due to the lack of data in pediatric patients. Additional studies are needed to strengthen the study results further.
OBJECTIVE: Continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) is the primary therapeutic modality utilized in hemodynamically unstable patients with severe acute kidney injury. As the circuit is extracorporeal, it poses an increased risk of blood clotting and circuit loss; frequent circuit losses affect the provider's ability to provide optimal treatment. The objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the extracorporeal anticoagulants in the pediatric CKRT population. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a literature search on PubMed/Medline and Embase for relevant citations. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they involved patients under the age of 18 years undergoing CKRT, with the use of anticoagulation (heparin, citrate, or prostacyclin) as a part of therapy. Only English articles were included in the study. DATA EXTRACTION: Initial search yielded 58 articles and a total of 24 articles were included and reviewed. A meta-analysis was performed focusing on the safety and effectiveness of regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) vs unfractionated heparin (UFH) anticoagulants in children. DATA SYNTHESIS: RCA had statistically significantly longer circuit life of 50.65 hours vs. UFH of 42.10 hours. Two major adverse effects metabolic alkalosis and electrolyte imbalance seen more commonly in RCA compared to UFH. There was not a significant difference in the risk of systemic bleeding when comparing RCA vs. UFH. CONCLUSION: RCA is the preferred anticoagulant over UFH due to its significantly longer circuit life, although vigilant circuit monitoring is required due to the increased risk of electrolyte disturbances. Prostacyclin was not included in the meta-analysis due to the lack of data in pediatric patients. Additional studies are needed to strengthen the study results further.
Authors: Emanuele Buccione; Stefano Bambi; Laura Rasero; Lorenzo Tofani; Tessa Piazzini; Carlo Della Pelle; Khadija El Aoufy; Zaccaria Ricci; Stefano Romagnoli; Gianluca Villa Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-05-31 Impact factor: 4.964