Literature DB >> 33688160

Successful Implementation of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery: A Real-World Economic Analysis.

David S George1,2, Margaret H Ainslie-Garcia3, Nicole C Ferko3, Hang Cheng4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To calculate the minimum number of Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) procedures required per month to pay off the fixed investment cost over 5 years to achieve break-even.
SETTING: A rural ophthalmology practice located in the mid-West United States.
DESIGN: An economic analysis, based on real-world, retrospectively collected data over 12 months, from an ambulatory surgical care perspective.
METHODS: FLACS was initiated in 2017 with the LenSx® laser (Alcon Vision LLC., Fort Worth, TX). The incremental cost of FLACS, cases needed to break-even, return on investment (ROI), patient education, and marketing efforts were assessed. The financial analysis considered cataract volume, conversion rates, fixed (eg, principal) and variable (eg, supplies) costs, and revenue in the first 12 months.
RESULTS: The clinic performed 2717 cataract surgeries in the 12-month period, with 1304 (48%) of patients converting to FLACS. Of FLACS procedures, 613 (47%) selected an advanced-technology intraocular lens (AT-IOL; eg, toric or lifestyle IOL), and the remaining patients selected a monofocal IOL with laser astigmatism correction. FLACS increased AT-IOL use by 113 procedures (23%) compared to volumes in the year prior to FLACS. Overall, FLACS was predicted to be profitable, with only 13 cases required per month to break even in 5 years. If both facility and physician fees are considered revenue, only eight cases per month are required to break-even in 5 years.
CONCLUSION: The practice experienced a greater-than-anticipated conversion to FLACS and increased selection of AT-IOLs, well above the break-even volume required, contributing to a rapid return on their investment.
© 2021 George et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cataract surgery; economic; femtosecond laser; financial pro-forma; return on investment

Year:  2021        PMID: 33688160      PMCID: PMC7936671          DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S293111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1177-5467


  10 in total

Review 1.  The economics of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

Authors:  John D Bartlett; Kevin M Miller
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.761

2.  Rising cataract surgery rates: demand and supply.

Authors:  Jay C Erie
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 3.  Financial return-on-investment of ophthalmic interventions: a new paradigm.

Authors:  Melissa M Brown; Gary C Brown; Heidi B Lieske; P Alexander Lieske
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.761

4.  Trends in Use of Ambulatory Surgery Centers for Cataract Surgery in the United States, 2001-2014.

Authors:  Brian C Stagg; Nidhi Talwar; Cynthia Mattox; Paul P Lee; Joshua D Stein
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 7.389

5.  Refractive expectations of patients having cataract surgery.

Authors:  Matthew J Hawker; Simon N Madge; Paul A Baddeley; Stephen R Perry
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 6.  Efficacy and Safety of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery Compared with Manual Cataract Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of 14 567 Eyes.

Authors:  Marko Popovic; Xavier Campos-Möller; Matthew B Schlenker; Iqbal Ike K Ahmed
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Profitability analysis of a femtosecond laser system for cataract surgery using a fuzzy logic approach.

Authors:  José Antonio Trigueros; David P Piñero; Mahmoud M Ismail
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  Cataract surgery in Australia: a profile of patient-centred outcomes.

Authors:  Chet K Pager; Peter J McCluskey; Con Retsas
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  Efficacy and safety of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification for cataract: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Chen; Wei Xiao; Shaobi Ye; Weirong Chen; Yizhi Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Comparing the Curative Effects between Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery and Conventional Phacoemulsification Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xinyi Chen; Kailin Chen; Jiliang He; Ke Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.