Literature DB >> 33687508

Auditory and imaging markers of atypical enlarged vestibular aqueduct.

Linsheng Wang1, Yuanlin Qin2, Laimin Zhu1, Xiaoyu Li3, Yueqin Chen1, Lihong Zhang4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To characterize the auditory and imaging markers of atypical enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA).
METHODS: 15 EVA cases (26 ears) confirmed via high-resolution MRI (HRMRI) that did not meet the Valvassori criterion on high-resolution CT (HRCT) were classified as atypical EVA. Another 21 EVA cases (40 ears) meeting the Valvassori criterion were randomly chosen as typical EVA. The hearing loss (HL), HRCT, and HRMRI findings were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: The difference of HL severity between atypical and typical EVA was not statistically significant (χ2 = 0.12, P > 0.05. The vestibular aqueducts (VA) of atypical EVA cases manifested as borderline dilation (n = 17), focal dilation (n = 3), and normal appearance (n = 6) on the HRCT. The midpoint width of atypical and typical EVA cases was 1.06 ± 0.18 mm and 2.10 ± 0.55 mm, respectively, exhibiting a significant difference (t = - 9.20, P < 0.05). In the HRMRI, the degree of dilation and shape of the intraosseous partition of endolymphatic duct and sac (ES) was similar to that of VA on HRCT, while their extraosseous ES was depicted variable slighter dilation compared to that of typical one, the difference between them was statistically significant (t = - 4.10, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The HL severity of atypical EVA ears was similar to that of typical ones. Nevertheless, borderline, focal dilation and normal-like appearance of VAs on HRCT and variablely slighter dilation of the extraosseous ES on HRMRI are its characteristic imaging findings.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atypical; Enlarged vestibular aqueduct; Magnetic resonance imaging; Tomography; X-ray computed

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33687508     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06700-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  24 in total

1.  The Human Vestibular Aqueduct: Anatomical Characteristics and Enlargement Criteria.

Authors:  Charlotta Kämpfe Nordström; Göran Laurell; Helge Rask-Andersen
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  A nationwide study on enlargement of the vestibular aqueduct in Japan.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Noguchi; Satoshi Fukuda; Kunihiro Fukushima; Kiyofumi Gyo; Akira Hara; Tsutomu Nakashima; Kaoru Ogawa; Makito Okamoto; Hiroaki Sato; Shin-Ichi Usami; Tatsuya Yamasoba; Tetsuji Yokoyama; Ken Kitamura
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 1.863

3.  MRI of enlarged endolymphatic sacs in the large vestibular aqueduct syndrome.

Authors:  K Okamoto; J Ito; T Furusawa; K Sakai; S Horikawa; S Tokiguchi
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Morphological analysis of the vestibular aqueduct by computerized tomography images.

Authors:  Sergio Ricardo Marques; Ricardo Luiz Smith; Sadao Isotani; Luís Garcia Alonso; Carlos Augusto Anadão; José Carlos Prates; Henrique Manoel Lederman
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  [Analysis of the correlation between radiological and audiological features of patients with enlarged vestibular aqueduct].

Authors:  S H Wu; X L Ma
Journal:  Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-10-07

Review 6.  Enlarged vestibular aqueduct: review of controversial aspects.

Authors:  Quinton Gopen; Guangwei Zhou; Kenneth Whittemore; Margaret Kenna
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Can a fixed measure serve as a pertinent diagnostic criterion for large vestibular aqueduct in children?

Authors:  Marc Legeais; Ken Haguenoer; Jean Philippe Cottier; Dominique Sirinelli
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-07-25

8.  Comparison of 45 degrees oblique reformats with axial reformats in CT evaluation of the vestibular aqueduct.

Authors:  B Ozgen; M E Cunnane; P A Caruso; H D Curtin
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Evaluation of the radiological criteria to diagnose large vestibular aqueduct syndrome.

Authors:  Mohamed M El-Badry; Nasr M Osman; Haytham Mamdouh Mohamed; Fatma M Rafaat
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 1.675

10.  Is CT or MRI the optimal imaging investigation for the diagnosis of large vestibular aqueduct syndrome and large endolymphatic sac anomaly?

Authors:  S E J Connor; C Dudau; I Pai; M Gaganasiou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.