| Literature DB >> 33687281 |
Nicolas Francos1, Gila Notesco1, Eyal Ben-Dor1.
Abstract
Quartz is the most abundant mineral on the earth's surface. It is spectrally active in the longwave infrared (LWIR) region with no significant spectral features in the optical domain, i.e., visible-near-infrared-shortwave-infrared (Vis-NIR-SWIR) region. Several space agencies are planning to mount optical image spectrometers in space, with one of their missions being to map raw materials. However, these sensors are active across the optical region, making the spectral identification of quartz mineral problematic. This study demonstrates that indirect relationships between the optical and LWIR regions (where quartz is spectrally dominant) can be used to assess quartz content spectrally using solely the optical region. To achieve this, we made use of the legacy Israeli soil spectral library, which characterizes arid and semiarid soils through comprehensive chemical and mineral analyses along with spectral measurements across the Vis-NIR-SWIR region (reflectance) and LWIR region (emissivity). Recently, a Soil Quartz Clay Mineral Index (SQCMI) was developed using mineral-related emissivity features to determine the content of quartz, relative to clay minerals, in the soil. The SQCMI was highly and significantly correlated with the Vis-NIR-SWIR spectral region (R2 = 0.82, root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.01, ratio of performance to deviation (RPD) = 2.34), whereas direct estimation of the quartz content using a gradient-boosting algorithm against the Vis-NIR-SWIR region provided poor results (R2 = 0.45, RMSE = 15.63, RPD = 1.32). Moreover, estimation of the SQCMI value was even more accurate when only the 2000-2450 nm spectral range (atmospheric window) was used (R2 = 0.9, RMSE = 0.005, RPD = 1.95). These results suggest that reflectance data across the 2000-2450 nm spectral region can be used to estimate quartz content, relative to clay minerals in the soil satisfactorily using hyperspectral remote sensing means.Entities:
Keywords: LWIR; Soil spectroscopy; Vis–NIR–SWIR; clay minerals; data analysis; gradient boosting; longwave infrared; machine learning; quartz; soil spectral library; thermal remote sensing; visible–near-infrared–shortwave-infrared
Year: 2021 PMID: 33687281 PMCID: PMC8255506 DOI: 10.1177/0003702821998302
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Spectrosc ISSN: 0003-7028 Impact factor: 2.388
Figure 1.(a) Emissivity spectra of samples H2 (lowest SQCMI) and EC1 (highest SQCMI). (b) Vis–NIR–SWIR reflectance of the same samples. (c) The normalized reflectance of H2 and EC1 in the 2000–2400 nm spectral range.
Figure 2.Histograms of the analyzed samples before and after removing samples with quartz-to-CM ratio values >10.
Statistics of the examined soil properties before removing the samples with a quartz-to-CM ratio > 10.a
| CM | SQCMI | Quartz:CM | Quartz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min | 2 | 0.98 | 0.01 | 1 |
| Max | 85 | 1.10 | 42.50 | 90 |
| Average | 24.74 | 1.01 | 4.02 | 39.78 |
| SD | 17.98 | 0.02 | 6.19 | 23.37 |
| Number of samples | 85 | 85 | 85 | 85 |
aSD, standard deviation; Min, minimum; Max, maximum; CM, clay minerals; SQCMI, soil-quartz-to-clay-minerals-index.
Statistics of the examined soil properties after removing the samples that have a quartz-to-CM ratio > 10.a
| CM | SQCMI | Quartz:CM | Quartz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min | 5 | 0.98 | 0.01 | 1 |
| Max | 85 | 1.05 | 8.86 | 85 |
| Average | 27.37 | 1.01 | 2.26 | 35.16 |
| SD | 17.53 | 0.01 | 2.31 | 20.54 |
| Number of samples | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 |
aSD, standard deviation; Min, minimum; Max, maximum; CM, clay minerals; SQCMI, soil-quartz-to-clay-minerals-index.
Correlation matrix (Pearson’s r) between the examined soil properties.
| Hyg. moisture | Quartz | Smectite | Illite | Kaolinite | CM | SSA | CaCO3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyg. moisture | 1 | –0.54 | 0.63 | 0.37 | 0.14 | 0.70 | 0.82 | 0.01 |
| Quartz | –0.54 | 1 | –0.35 | –0.38 | –0.29 | –0.55 | –0.54 | –0.66 |
| Smectite | 0.63 | –0.35 | 1 | –0.22 | 0.24 | 0.85 | 0.85 | –0.32 |
| Illite | 0.37 | –0.38 | –0.22 | 1 | –0.13 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.40 |
| Kaolinite | 0.14 | –0.29 | 0.24 | –0.13 | 1 | 0.61 | 0.24 | –0.24 |
| CM | 0.70 | –0.55 | 0.85 | 0.09 | 0.61 | 1 | 0.82 | –0.24 |
| SSA | 0.82 | –0.54 | 0.85 | 0.03 | 0.24 | 0.82 | 1 | −0.16 |
| CaCO3 | 0.01 | –0.66 | –0.32 | 0.40 | –0.24 | –0.24 | –0.16 | 1 |
Figure 3.Spectral-based model for quartz prediction using Vis-NIR-SWIR spectral data. (a) Validation group. (b) Feature importance spectrum.
Figure 4.Spectral-based model for prediction of quartz using the 2000–2450 nm spectral range. (a) Validation group. (b) Feature importance spectrum.
Figure 5.Spectral-based model for the prediction of the sum of the main CM using Vis–NIR–SWIR spectral data. (a) Validation group. (b) Feature importance spectrum.
Figure 6.Spectral-based model for the prediction of SQCMI using Vis–NIR–SWIR spectral data. (a) Validation group. (b) Feature importance spectrum.
Figure 7.Spectral-based model for the prediction of SQCMI using the 2000–2450 nm spectral range. (a) Validation group. (b) Feature importance spectrum. (c) Relationship between SQCMI and quartz-to-CM ratio (z-scores).
Figure 8.Spectral-based model for the prediction of quartz-to-CM ratio using Vis-NIR-SWIR spectral data. (a) Validation group. (b) Feature importance spectrum.
A summary of the statistics parameters and the most important wavelengths (nm) of the spectral-based models.
| Quartz | Quartz (2000–2450 nm spectral range) | CM | SQCMI | SQCMI (2000–2450 nm spectral range) | Quartz:CM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPD | 1.32 | 1.18 | 1.7 | 2.34 | 1.95 | 2.02 |
| R2 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.7 | 0.82 | 0.9 | 0.75 |
| RMSE | 15.63 | 16.58 | 7.36 | 0.01 | 0.005 | 1.19 |
| N Cal | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 |
| N Val | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| Indicative bands (nm) (feature importance value over 0.1) | 2258 | 2257, 2272, 2343 | 1945, 1947, 1947 | 1918, 2377 | 2345, 2344, 2424 | 1421, 1422 |
| Pre-processing | SG first derivative | SG first derivative | SG first derivative | SG first derivative | SG first derivative | SG first derivative |