Dimpimoni Das1, Purba J Saikia2, Upasa Gowala1, Hirendra N Sarma1. 1. Molecular Endocrinology and Reproductive Biology Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Rajiv Gandhi University, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh, India. 2. Department of Zoology, Dhemaji College, Dhemaji, Assam, India. Email: purbajyoti81@gmail.com.
A road map of embryo growth, implantation and further development in laboratory model
system (rodents) is being a matter of biological investigation in vivo,
during the last few decades. Roles of ovarian hormones (estrogen and progesterone) in
maternal tissue for embryonic receptivity and tissue regeneration during early gestation
period are well established (1). The peri-implantation period in mice is considered critical
for successful pregnancy during which embryonic cellular proliferation and differentiation
takes place; at the same time change of maternal tissue occurs to accommodate the growing
embryo. The changed cellular pattern of embryo and maternal tissue is steered by altered
biochemical milieu and physiological processes in precisely coordinated manner between fetal
and maternal tissues. In the process, growth factors are expressed by the both tissues in
sequential pattern, especially during peri-implantation in mice. Our earlier studies showed
that insulin like growth factor (2), transforming growth factor-β (3) and vascular
endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-C (4) were expressed in embryo and uterine tissue of albino
rat during the peri-implantation period. VEGF is a potent mitogenic factor for endothelial
cells and it is expressed in spatial-temporal manner associated with physiological events of
angiogenesis (5).During mouse embryo development, vascular permeability of the uterus facilitates the encounter mechanism of
trophectoderm to the uterine luminal epithelium and it is
considered as one of the prime pre-requisite for successful implantation process. It is well established that VEGF
is associated with uterine vascular permeability, which is
sine qua non for attachment of embryonic trophectoderm
to the maternal endometrial epithelium, leading to successful pregnancy (6-8). VEGF and the corresponding
receptor (VEGFR) actively participate in the process of
vascular permeability and decidualization (9), uterine and
embryonic angiogenesis (10). VEGF executed its physiological effects, mainly through VEGF receptor-1 known
as fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (Flt-1) and VEGF receptor-2
known as fetal liver kinase-1/kinase insert domain-containing receptor (Flk-1/KDR) (11-14). Research works
revealed Flk-1/KDR as a principal receptor of VEGF signal transduction, associated with proliferation and migration of endothelial cells (15-17). Rising permeability at
the uterine vasculature and subsequent angiogenesis have
vital role in successful implantation, decidualization and
placentation (18).VEGF is known to be a key candidate in the vascular
modification at the uterine bed as well as it has a crucial effect on the survival of embryonic cytotrophoblast
in the placenta (19). However, signaling mechanism of
the VEGF through VEGFR during mouse embryo development needs to be studied further. In situ localization
of VEGF and VEGFR in fetal-maternal tissue of mice
during peri-implantation shall provide information on the
origin and pattern of cellular proliferation for vasculogenesis during this crucial period of embryonic development.
In our earlier study, VEGF-C was shown to be expressed
in cell specific manner, in the both embryo and maternal
tissuesof mice (20). VEGF-C boundto VEGFR-2 (Flk-1/
KDR), as a criticalrequirement for the movement of embryonic endothelial stem cells from primitive streak to
yolk sac: a prerequisite for embryonic blood vessel formation (21).Research revealed that VEGF and Flk-1/KDR were
co-expressed in granulosa cells of ovarian follicles and
cultured granulosa cells (22). During follicular and luteal
developmental period, differential expression of VEGF
was evidenced in granulosa cells and theca cells (23, 24).
However, cell specific expression of Flk-1/KDR in uterine as well as fetal-maternal tissues during early gestation
period is yet not fully understood. In our present study,
in situ localization of VEGFR-2 (Flk-1/KDR) in fetalmaternal tissue of mouse during peri-implantation was
studied. The results might provide the insight of cellular
localization and sequences of vasculogenesis in mouse
embryo, during early gestation.Extensive research work for the last few decades revealed the crucial role of sex steroids, specially estrogen
and progesterone, on successful pregnancy outcome. Investigation of feto-uterine circulation revealed that estrogen has actively participated in the process of angiogenesis and vasodilation, thus regulating the utero-placental
blood flow (25). Progesterone also play crucial role in the
stromal decidualization; thereby increasing vascular permeability, associated with the uterine vasodilation (26). In
the present research work, effects of ovarian steroids on
VEGFR-2 expression during this critical period was studied using estradiol-17β antagonist (anti-E2) and progesterone antagonist (anti-P4) administered subcutaneously
(S.C.) to female during peri-implantation period.Findings of the present research work will help shed
light on deciphering the role of VEGF and its receptors in
fetal-maternal cross talks as well as embryonic development during early gestation period.
Materials and Methods
Animal experiments
The present experimental investigation was done on cyclic female Swiss albino mice (LACA strain). The mice
were housed in Departmental Animal Rearing Facility
maintaining natural light and dark period. The animals
were fed with regular food (Bengal gram, corn flour and
vitamin supplement) and water ad libitum and they were
treated with antihelmintic drug in every six months. The
experimental animal handling protocols were approved
by the Institutional Animal Ethical Committee, Rajiv
Gandhi University (India) following “Breeding of and Experiments on Animals (Control and Supervision) Rules,
1998”. Mature female mice (25 ± 10 g body weight, 6-8
weeks old), showing normal estrous cycle, were mated
with fertile males at the ratio of 2:1 (2 females: 1 male)
of the same strain to establish pregnancy. For each group,
five mice were used in the present research work (n=5).
Pregnancy was confirmed after detection of the vaginal
plug and it was considered the first day (D1) of pregnancy
upon determining the vaginal plug. Mice were dissected
on specific day to collect the uterine samples. Implantation sites on days 4, 5 and 6 were detected by intravenous
administration of 0.1 ml 1% Chicago sky blue (SigmaAldrich, USA) in tail vein 15 minutes before necropsy.
The implantation sites were demarcated by distinct blue
bands. The space between sites of implantation was called
inter sites.
In situ localization of VEGFR-2 (Flk-1/KDR)
During the present research work, immunolocalization
of the Flk-1/KDR was performed using HRP-conjugated
as well as FITC-conjugated secondary antibody (Santacruz Biotech, USA) following the standard method
(27). The immunofluorescence technique was used to
corroborate the immunohistochemistry result, since the
fluorescence signal was very sensitive and gave precise
signal. This was the reason of using both HRP-conjugated
and FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies in the present
research. Immunohistochemical localization of Flk-1/
KDR was performed in uterine sections embedded in paraffin using HRP and FITC conjugated secondary antibodies. Briefly, the uterine tissues were collected from D4
to D7 of gestations and they were subsequently fixed in
bouin’s solution for 72 hours. Following fixation, the tissues were subjected to wash in running tap water for 3-4
hours, dehydrated by passing through different grades of
alcohol from 30 to 100% and they were finally kept overnight for paraffin embedding, followed by preparation of
blocks. Tissue blocks were sectioned at 5 µm thickness
using rotary microtome and they were mounted on glass
slides coated with poly-L-Lysine (Sigma-Aldrich, USA).
The sections were then kept overnight at 37°C to dry. The
sections were deparaffinized for 5 minutes in xylene with
two times changing followed by adding isopropanol for
5 minutes. Next, they were rehydrated by passing from
different alcohol grades from 100 to 30% and they were
thereby washed in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) buffer (10
mM) for 5 minutes with three times changing the buffer.
Antigen retrieval was performed by 10 mM citrate buffer
(pH=6.0).Blocking endogenous peroxidase action was performed by 3% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) for 30
minutes in methanol. Non-specific binding was prevented by incubating the sections in 10%
normal goat serum (NGS, Santacruz Biotech, USA) for 3-4 hours in a humidified chamber at
room temperature. Then, the sections were incubated with Flk-1 and mouse monoclonal IgG
(both from Santacruz Biotech, USA) primary antibody overnight at 4°C. Primary antibody was
diluted in Tris-buffered saline-bovine serum albumin (TBS-BSA) at a concentration of 2.5
µg/ml. The primary antibody treated sections were then washed with TBS buffer for 5
minutes and they were either incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (Goat
antimouse IgG-HRP, Santacruz Biotech, USA) or fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) labeled
secondary antibody (Goat anti-mouse, IgG-FITC, Santacruz Biotech, USA) for 2 hours. In
order to detect signal development for immunohistochemistry, the sections were incubated
with diaminobenzidine (DAB) substrate (Amresco, USA) dissolved in TBS and 0.3%
H2O2 at a concentration of 1 mg/ml. Finally, the sections were
briefly counterstained with delafield hematoxylin, dehydrated and mounted with D.P.X
(Merck, India).Similarly, the sections were mounted with an anti-fade
mounting media (Santacruz Biotech, USA) for immunofluorescence. Negative control was performed by substituting the primary antibody with normal IgG in the
both experiments. The sections were photographed using
DM5000B fluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystem,
Germany) in different magnifications. Quantitative analysis of the immunofluorescent signals of Flk-1/KDR was
studied by using ImageJ software (Version 1.46r, NIH,
USA). Intensity values were counted in terms of percentage of the signal. Below 20% values were designated as
low intensity (+); 20-40% was considered as moderate
(++), 40-80% was defined as high intensity (+++) and
above 80% values were considered as intense (++++).
The result showed that different cell types of the both
embryo and uterine tissues exhibited immunofluorescent
signals with varied intensities.
Administration of estradiol-17β and progesterone antagonist
Activity of ovarian estrogen was blocked with S.C. injection of estradiol-17β (E2) antagonist ICI 182780 (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) once in a day in between 8 am and 9
am, at a dose of 100 µg/100 µl (28) for three consecutive
days from D2 to D4. The treated mice were euthanized
on D5 between 8 am and 9 am and uterine tissues were
collected. Likewise, progesterone (P4) antagonist RU486
(Mifepriston, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) treated mice received
400 µg/100 µl (28) S.C. between 8 am and 9 am on D4
and D5. Upon euthanasia, the uterine tissues were collected on D6 between 8 am and 9 am, for further studies.
Western blotting of VEGFR-2 (Flk-1/KDR)
Total uterine proteins were extracted using TRI Reagent
(Sigma-Aldrich, USA). The uteri were excised and rinsed
with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove cellular
debris. The uteri were homogenized in TRI reagent following the manufacturer’s protocol. Concentration of the protein was detected by Bradford method (Bradford, 1976).
The uterine proteins were separated on 12% sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDSPAGE) using Mini-PROTEAN Tetra cell electrophoresis
apparatus (Bio-Rad, USA), following the standard method.The separated proteins were transferred onto the nitrocellulose membrane (Optitran BA-S 85, 200 mm×3
mm) using Mini Trans-Blot system (BioRad, USA) at
100 V for 1 hour. Briefly, the membrane was rinsed with
Tris-buffered saline and Tween 20 (TBST). Non-specific
binding sites were blocked with 5% Blotto non-fat dry
milk (Santacruz Biotech, USA) in TBST for 2 hours. The
membrane was washed with 1X TBST and incubated in
4°C overnight with the mouse monoclonal Flk-1 (A-3).
The membrane was washed with TBST for 5 minutes
followed by washing with TBST and TBS (1:1) for 5
minutes with two changes. The membrane was then incubated with HRP-conjugated Goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (Santacruz Biotech, USA) diluted in TBST
and TBS (50:50) at room temperature for 2 hours. The
membrane was next incubated with tetramethylbenzidine
(TMB, Sigma, USA) blotting substrate solution until the
band begins to appear. The reaction was stopped by washing the membrane with distilled water. Protein bands were
visualized and photographs were taken under ChemiDoc
MP System (BioRad, USA). Densitometry analysis of the
western blot bands were performed using ImageJ software, using the standard software protocols.
RNA isolation and quantitative reverse transcription
polymerase chain reaction
Total RNA was isolated from the uterine tissues treated with TRI Reagent, following the
manufacturer’s protocol. The isolated RNA was measured in the ratio of 260-280 in NanoDrop
2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA). RNA samples were reverse transcribed into
singlestranded cDNA according to the manufacturer’s instruction using
iScriptTMcDNA synthesis kit (BioRad, USA). Primers were designed using the
Primer-3 plus software from National Center for Biotechnology Information database (NCBI;
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The primer sequences for Flk-1/KDR includeF: 5'-TTGGAGCATCTCATCTGTTACAGC-3' andR: 5'-GGCCGGCTCTTTCGCTTACT-3'.The primers for G6PDH wereF: 5'-TCATGTTTGAGACCTTCAA-3' andR: 5'-GTCTTTGCGGATGTCCACG-3'.Real-time quantitative reveres transcription polymerase
chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed in a 20 µl reaction
volume containing 10 µl of 2x iTaq universal SYBR Green
supermix (BioRad, USA), 2 µl of each forward and reverse
primers, 3 µl DNA template and 3 µl nuclease free water for
the quantification of Flk-1/KDR expression using CFX96
Touch Real-time PCR detection system (BioRad, USA). The
qRT-PCR program was as following: initial denaturation at
95˚C for 5 seconds, annealing/extension at 60˚C for 30 seconds, as two-steps cycling: 40 cycles; melt curve analysis
was performed at 95˚C for 5 seconds and polymerase activation/DNA denaturation at 95˚C for 30 seconds. Finally, data
were analyzed using the BioRad CFX Manager software.
Statistical analysis
Densitometry data of immuno-signal intensity, western blotting and qRT-PCR product of
Flk-1/KDR were statistically analyzed using the statistical software
(SPSS, version 10.0, SPSS Inc. USA). Western blot and qRT-PCR densitometry data on D4 of
gestation was compared to the other gestation days. All data were presented as mean value
± standard error (SEM). One-way ANOVA was performed and it was followed by Tukey post hoc
test to find the significant difference. All differences were considered statistically
significant, providin g P<0.05.
Results
Day 4 (D4)
The uterine tissue treating with HRP-conjugated antibody on D4 of gestation (Fig.1A-D) showed strong expression of Flk-1/KDR in the luminal and uterine glandular epithelium. Stromal cells expressed the receptor with
moderate intensity. Myometrium and perimetrium also
exhibited immunostaining of Flk-1/KDR on D4 of gestation. From D4 of gestation onwards, the stromal cells underwent dramatic morphological and biochemical changes which were considered as prerequisite for implantation
of the growing embryo to the maternal tissue.
Fig.1
Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence of D4 mice uterus. A-D.
Immunohistochemical localization of Flk-1/KDR on D4 mice uterus using HRP-conjugated
antibody. The receptor is localized in the LE, UGs and S. The expression is more in LE
and glandular epithelium compared to stromal cells. A1-D1. These figures
depicts immunofluorescence of Flk-1/KDR on D4 mice uterus using FITC-conjugated
antibody. The receptor is localized in LE, UGs and S. The expression pattern is
similar to the HRP-conjugated antibody. LE and glandular epithelium exhibit strong
expressions of the receptor (original magnification: A, A1: 5x, B, C, B1, C1: 20x, D,
D1: 40x, scale bar: A, A1: 100 μm, B, C, B1, C1: 50 μm, D, D1: 10 μm). LE; Luminal
epithelium, UG; Uterine glands, S; Stroma, and NC; Negative control.
Immunofluorescence of Flk-1/KDR using FITC-conjugated secondary antibody is presented in the Figure 1A1-
D1. The result showed proliferative endometrial epithelium
with distinct epithelial cell layers. The immunofluorescence
result revealed presence of the receptor in the luminal epithelium, uterine glands and stroma similar to that of the
HRP-conjugated antibody. Stromal cells in close vicinity of
the endometrial epithelium exhibited higher intensity of the
Flk-1/KDR expression. It was observed that expression of
the receptor was higher in the stromal cells surrounding the
uterine glands compared to that of the other areas. Expression of FITC-conjugated antibody was corroborative with
that of the HRP-conjugated antibody in the uterine tissue
sections on D4 of gestation. Signal analysis revealed that
expression of Flk-1/KDR was strong in the luminal epithelium and uterine glands (Table S1, See Supplementary
online Information at www.ijfs.ir).Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence of D4 mice uterus. A-D.
Immunohistochemical localization of Flk-1/KDR on D4 mice uterus using HRP-conjugated
antibody. The receptor is localized in the LE, UGs and S. The expression is more in LE
and glandular epithelium compared to stromal cells. A1-D1. These figures
depicts immunofluorescence of Flk-1/KDR on D4 mice uterus using FITC-conjugated
antibody. The receptor is localized in LE, UGs and S. The expression pattern is
similar to the HRP-conjugated antibody. LE and glandular epithelium exhibit strong
expressions of the receptor (original magnification: A, A1: 5x, B, C, B1, C1: 20x, D,
D1: 40x, scale bar: A, A1: 100 μm, B, C, B1, C1: 50 μm, D, D1: 10 μm). LE; Luminal
epithelium, UG; Uterine glands, S; Stroma, and NC; Negative control.Imunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence of D5 mice uterus. A-D.
Immunohistochemistry of Flk-1/KDR on D5 of gestation using HRP-conjugated antibody.
LE, UGs and Sexpress Flk-1/KDR. E and TC also express the receptor. LE and UGs on D5
express more Flk-1/KDR in comparison with D4. However, expression of the receptor is
more intense in the glandular epithelium than LE on D5 of gestation. The red dotted
line showed PDZ. A1-D1. These figures showed immunolocalization of
Flk-1/KDR on D5 of gestation, using FITC conjugated secondary antibody. The receptor
is localized strongly in the TC and the DC surrounding the embryo. The emerging EPC
also express Flk-1/KDR. The embryonic cells exhibit expression of the growth factor
receptor (original magnification: A: 5x, B, C: 20x, D, C1, D1: 40x, A1, B1: 10x, scale
bar: A: 100 μm, B, C, A1, B1: 50 μm, D, C1, D1: 10 μm). M; Mesometrium, E; Embryo, AM;
Anti-mesometrium, LE; Luminal epithelium, UG; Uterine glands, PDZ; Primary decidual
zone, EPC; Ectoplacental cone, DC; Decidual cell, TC; Trophectodermal cell, and NC;
Negative control.
Day 5 (D5)
After successful implantation of the blastocyst to the
uterine endometrial epithelium on D4.5, the embryo appeared as an oval structure on D5 of gestation (Fig.2). It
was observed that embryo attached to the mesometrial
pole in the maternal epithelium and gradually invaded
to the maternal tissue. The luminal epithelium appeared
to be apposition with each other. The decidual cell (DC)
reaction was started during this period and the stromal
cells were gradually changed to round structure and transformed to DC. The decidualization process was firstly
started at the stromal cells surrounded the embryo forming primary decidual zone (PDZ). The trophectodermal
cells were attached to the maternal wall creating a fluid
filled blastocyst cavity (BC) for accommodation of the
embryo. The inner cell mass of blastocyst gradually proliferate, forming embryo in the BC surrounded by trophoblast cells (TCs). During this period, ectoplacental cone
(EPC) formation was started at the mesometrial site.
Fig.2
Imunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence of D5 mice uterus. A-D.
Immunohistochemistry of Flk-1/KDR on D5 of gestation using HRP-conjugated antibody.
LE, UGs and Sexpress Flk-1/KDR. E and TC also express the receptor. LE and UGs on D5
express more Flk-1/KDR in comparison with D4. However, expression of the receptor is
more intense in the glandular epithelium than LE on D5 of gestation. The red dotted
line showed PDZ. A1-D1. These figures showed immunolocalization of
Flk-1/KDR on D5 of gestation, using FITC conjugated secondary antibody. The receptor
is localized strongly in the TC and the DC surrounding the embryo. The emerging EPC
also express Flk-1/KDR. The embryonic cells exhibit expression of the growth factor
receptor (original magnification: A: 5x, B, C: 20x, D, C1, D1: 40x, A1, B1: 10x, scale
bar: A: 100 μm, B, C, A1, B1: 50 μm, D, C1, D1: 10 μm). M; Mesometrium, E; Embryo, AM;
Anti-mesometrium, LE; Luminal epithelium, UG; Uterine glands, PDZ; Primary decidual
zone, EPC; Ectoplacental cone, DC; Decidual cell, TC; Trophectodermal cell, and NC;
Negative control.
Using HRP-conjugated secondary antibody, immunohistochemistry showed distinctive expression of the receptor in different embryonic cell types, maternal tissues
and fetal-maternal interface (Fig.2A-D). The receptor was
localized in the embryonic trophectodermal cells as well
as developing EPC with moderate intensity on D5 of gestation (Fig.2A, B). The cells surrounding the implanted
embryo occupied a distinctive region of DCs forming
PDZ, as mentioned earlier. DCs surrounding embryo
showed strong Flk-1/KDR immunostaining (Table S1,
See Supplementary online Information at www.ijfs.ir).
It was also demonstrated that DCs surrounding the embryonic pole of embryo exhibited strong immunostaining
of Flk-1/KDR, compared to that of the anti-mesometrial
side. Interestingly, the glandular epithelium exhibited intense immunostaining of Flk-1/KDR, compared to that of
the luminal epithelium (Fig.2C, D).Cell specific immunolocalization of Flk-1/KDR in the
fetal-maternal tissues and embryo on D5 of gestation
was established by the immunofluorescence study, using FITC-conjugated secondary antibody (Fig.2 A1-D1).
Immunofluorescence study revealed strong expression of
the receptor at the developing EPC. DCs of PDZ showed
strong expression of the receptor. Trophectodermal cells
surrounding embryo showed strong expression of Flk-1/
KDR. Moreover, both the mural and polar TCs of embryo
exhibited significant expression of Flk-1/KDR on D5 of
gestation. It was also observed that the embryonic cells
expressed the Flk-1/KDR receptor with moderate intensity (Table S1, See Supplementary online Information at
www.ijfs.ir).
Day 6 (D6)
A rapid morphological as well as spatial change of the
stromal cells occurred with the progression of post-implantation gestation days. On D6 of gestation, the area of
DCs was expanded from PDZ towards the myometrium.
This expanded decidual zone is called secondary decidual
zone (SDZ). The embryo attached to the maternal wall
through trophoblastic cells of EPC. During this period of
gestation, the luminal epithelium within implantation site
was degraded, due to the invasion of the trophoblasts resulted in tearing of the maternal stroma. The expression
was detected by HRP-conjugated antibody in PDZ cells of
the implantation sites (Fig.3). The trophectodermal cells
surrounding BC and the embryo cells, especially those
bordering the embryo, exhibited strong immunostaining
of Flk-1/KDR receptor. Higher expression of Flk-1/KDR
at the decidual zone associated with differentiation and migration of DCs to form SDZ. It was observed that expression of the receptor was more in the PDZ. Moreover, the expression was low in SDZ, compared to PDZ.
Trophectodermal cells and certain cells of the embryo exhibited significant receptor expression. Maternal luminal
epithelium exhibited strong expression of the Flk-1/KDR.
Fig.3
Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence of D6 mice uterus. A-D.
Immunohistochemical localization of Flk-1/KDR on D6 mice uterus and fetal
maternal tissues using HRP-conjugated antibody. The receptor is localized in PDZ and
SDZ. LE and E cells, especially the cells bordering the embryo exhibit more
immunostaining of Flk-1. DC also exhibit expression of the receptor.
A1-E1. These figures depicts immunolocalization of Flk-1/KDR on D6 of
gestation using FITC conjugated antibody. DCs of the SDZ express more Flk-1/KDR
compared to PDZ. The receptor is localized in TC and DC surrounding the embryo. E
cells exhibit expression of the receptor. A2-D2. These figures showed
immunofluorescence of Flk-1/KDR on D6 of embryo using FITC conjugated antibody. The
receptor is localized in the M and AM sides surrounding the embryo. E cells also
express Flk-1/KDR. Intensity of the expression is strong in LE. EPC also express
Flk-1/KDR with high intensity. BC is formed to accommodate the developing embryo
(original magnification A, A1, B1, D2: 5x, B, C1, A2: 10x, C, C2: 20x, D, D1, E1, B2:
40x, scale bar: A, A1, B1: 100 μm, B, C, C1, A2: 50 μm, D, D2: 100 μm, D1, E1, B2, C2:
10 μm). PDZ; Primary decidual zone, SDZ; Secondary decidual zone, LE; Luminal
epithelium, E; Embryo, DC; Decidual cell, M; Mesometrial, AM; Anti-mesometrial, EPC;
Ectoplacental cone, BC; Blastocyst cavity, UL; Uterine lumen, TC; Trophoblast cell, S;
Stroma, and NC; Negative control.
Study of Flk-1/KDR (using FITC-conjugated antibody)
on D6 of gestation showed that the receptor was expressed
in the cells of fetal-maternal interface (Fig.3 A1-E1). It was
observed that embryonic cells bordering embryo exhibited
significant expression of the Flk-1/KDR. During this period, PDZ showed higher expression of receptor, in comparison with SDZ. Trophectodermal cells of the embryo
also exhibited expression of the Flk-1/KDR. TCs of mesometrial and anti-mesometrial side surrounding the embryo
exhibited strong expression of the receptor (Fig.3 A2-D2).Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence of D6 mice uterus. A-D.
Immunohistochemical localization of Flk-1/KDR on D6 mice uterus and fetal
maternal tissues using HRP-conjugated antibody. The receptor is localized in PDZ and
SDZ. LE and E cells, especially the cells bordering the embryo exhibit more
immunostaining of Flk-1. DC also exhibit expression of the receptor.
A1-E1. These figures depicts immunolocalization of Flk-1/KDR on D6 of
gestation using FITC conjugated antibody. DCs of the SDZ express more Flk-1/KDR
compared to PDZ. The receptor is localized in TC and DC surrounding the embryo. E
cells exhibit expression of the receptor. A2-D2. These figures showed
immunofluorescence of Flk-1/KDR on D6 of embryo using FITC conjugated antibody. The
receptor is localized in the M and AM sides surrounding the embryo. E cells also
express Flk-1/KDR. Intensity of the expression is strong in LE. EPC also express
Flk-1/KDR with high intensity. BC is formed to accommodate the developing embryo
(original magnification A, A1, B1, D2: 5x, B, C1, A2: 10x, C, C2: 20x, D, D1, E1, B2:
40x, scale bar: A, A1, B1: 100 μm, B, C, C1, A2: 50 μm, D, D2: 100 μm, D1, E1, B2, C2:
10 μm). PDZ; Primary decidual zone, SDZ; Secondary decidual zone, LE; Luminal
epithelium, E; Embryo, DC; Decidual cell, M; Mesometrial, AM; Anti-mesometrial, EPC;
Ectoplacental cone, BC; Blastocyst cavity, UL; Uterine lumen, TC; Trophoblast cell, S;
Stroma, and NC; Negative control.Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence of D7 mice uterus. A-E.
Immunohistochemical localization of Flk-1/KDR on D7 mice uterus and fetal maternal
tissues using HRP-conjugated antibody. The receptor is localized in the E cells,
specifically in EPC. E cells towards EPC exhibit more immunostaining than the
embryonic cells of the anti-mesometrial side. Expression of the receptor in the cell
layering VS of M side revealed possible involvement of the receptor in placenta
development. Arrow heads show presence of receptor towards M side. The red dotted line
depicts the PTCs and blue dotted line depicts the ITCs of the EPC. A1-C1.
These figures depicts immunohistochemical localization of Flk-1/KDR on D7 mice uterus
and fetal maternal tissues using FITC-conjugated antibody. The receptor is localized
in the cells of the embryo and specifically in EPC. E cells towards the EPC exhibit
more immunostaining than the embryonic cells of anti-mesometrial side. The red dotted
line depicts PTCs and yellow dotted line depicts ITCs (original magnification: A: 5x,
B: 10x, C: 20x, D, E, A1-C1: 40x, scale bar: A: 100 μm, B, C: 50 μm, D, E, A1-C1: 10
μm). E; Embryo, EPC; Ectoplacental cone, VS; Vascular sinusoids, M; Mesometrium, PTC;
Peripheral trophoblast cell, ITC; Inner trophoblast cells, AM; Anti-mesometrium, DC;
Decidual cell, and NC; Negative control
Day 7 (D7)
On D7 of gestation, there was a drastic morphological
change of the embryo as well as the maternal tissues. During this period, embryo was elongated in shape with proper development of EPC in the mesometrial side (Fig.4).
During D7 of gestation, EPC was rapidly developed and
it was morphologically organized in distinct cell populations: the inner and peripheral cells, as shown in Figure
4D and B1. During D7, VS were extensively formed at
the mesometrial side. Strong immunostaining of the Flk1/KDR in the VS at the mesometrial side was observed.
It is believed that sinusoids provide surface area for the
developing embryo. Immunohistochemical localization
of Flk-1/KDR, using HRP-conjugated antibody, showed
that the receptor was specifically confined in the EPC with
high intensity. In this stage, PDZ was gradually degraded
and overlaid by SDZ. Peripheral TCs (PTCs) of the EPC
expressed more Flk-1/KDR immunostaining, in comparison with the other area. It was determined that different
cell types of the embryo also expressed the receptor with
diverse intensities. Different cell types of EPC expressed
Flk-1/KDR with diverse intensities. PTCs of the EPC expressed strong immuno-signal of Flk-1/KDR, compared
to the inner TCs (ITCs) of EPC (Fig.4B1). Moreover, the
TCs bordering EPC exhibited strong expression of receptor. At this stage, the embryo was elongated in the specific
orientation. Embryonic cells were differentiated into three
germinal layers with formation of inner cleft. Different
cell types of the embryo also exhibited various intensities
of the Flk-1/KDR expression. DCs surrounded the developing embryo also expressed the receptor.
Fig.4
Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence of D7 mice uterus. A-E.
Immunohistochemical localization of Flk-1/KDR on D7 mice uterus and fetal maternal
tissues using HRP-conjugated antibody. The receptor is localized in the E cells,
specifically in EPC. E cells towards EPC exhibit more immunostaining than the
embryonic cells of the anti-mesometrial side. Expression of the receptor in the cell
layering VS of M side revealed possible involvement of the receptor in placenta
development. Arrow heads show presence of receptor towards M side. The red dotted line
depicts the PTCs and blue dotted line depicts the ITCs of the EPC. A1-C1.
These figures depicts immunohistochemical localization of Flk-1/KDR on D7 mice uterus
and fetal maternal tissues using FITC-conjugated antibody. The receptor is localized
in the cells of the embryo and specifically in EPC. E cells towards the EPC exhibit
more immunostaining than the embryonic cells of anti-mesometrial side. The red dotted
line depicts PTCs and yellow dotted line depicts ITCs (original magnification: A: 5x,
B: 10x, C: 20x, D, E, A1-C1: 40x, scale bar: A: 100 μm, B, C: 50 μm, D, E, A1-C1: 10
μm). E; Embryo, EPC; Ectoplacental cone, VS; Vascular sinusoids, M; Mesometrium, PTC;
Peripheral trophoblast cell, ITC; Inner trophoblast cells, AM; Anti-mesometrium, DC;
Decidual cell, and NC; Negative control
Expression of VEGFR-2 (Flk-1/KDR) following antiE2 and anti-P4 administrations
Expression of Flk-1/KDR in the uteri of females administered with anti-E2 and anti-P4 is presented in Figure 5. Anti-E2 treatment was given from D2 to D4 and
uterine samples were collected on D5. As expected, findings showed no sign of implantation, due to the antagonistic blocking of the E2 receptor in the uterine cells. No
immuno-signal of Flk-1/KDR was observed in the antiE2 treated uterine sections (Fig.5A, C). Anti-P4 injection
was administered on D4 and D5, followed by sacrificing
the female mice on D6 of gestation. Due to the blocking P4 receptor, there was failure of implantation. Thus,
the pregnancy developmental process could not proceed
and the embryo was failed to develop. Therefore, anti-P4
treated D6 uterus was determined under developed BC
without presence of the embryo, as shown in Figure 5B.
The implanted blastocyst could not survive, due to the
absence of P4 signaling activity. In this research, Flk-1/
KDR expression was not detected in the anti-P4 treated
mice uterus (Fig.5B, D).
Fig.5
Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence of anti-E2 and anti-P4 treated mice uterus.
A. Immunohistochemistry of Flk-1/KDR using HRP-conjugated and
FITC-conjugated antibody on anti-E2 treated (A and C) and
anti-P4 treated (B and D) mice uterus. The figure showed
that Flk1/KDR was not expressed in the anti-E2 and anti-P4 treated uterus. E,
F. These figure showed normal pregnant mice with five and six days embryo and
BC for comparing with E2 and P4 antagonist treatment. Asterisk (*) showed
underdeveloped BC (scale bar: 50 μm). E2; Estrogen, P4; Progesterone, E; Embryo, and
BC; Blastocyst cavity.
Western blot analysis showed Flk-1/KDR protein in the
all gestation days (D4-D7) of the experimental period. It
was found that intensity of protein bands was gradually
increased in western blot from D4 to D7, demonstrating
higher expression of the receptor with progression of gestation days (Fig.6A, B). β-actin was used as loading control during this experiment. The results showed that Flk-1/
KDR reached to the maximum level on D7 of gestation, in
comparison with D4. Densitometric analysis showed that
expression level of Flk-1/KDR on D7 was significantly
higher than D4 (P<0.05) of gestation. No protein expression was detected for the anti-E2 and anti-P4 uterus
Fig.6
Western blotting and qRT-PCR analysis of Flk-1/KDR. A. Western blotting of Flk-1/KDR
during peri-implantation period (D4-D7) of gestation and in E2 and P4 antagonist
treated uterus. B. Densitometric analysis of western blotting result of
Flk-1/KDR protein. The result showed significant increase of the receptor on D7 when
compared to D4. All experiments are repeated three times. Data are shown as mean ± SEM
(P<0.05), compared to D4. C. qRT-PCR of Flk-1/KDR
during D4-D7 of gestation, in addition to the E2 and P4 antagonist treated uterus. The
result revealed that Flk-1mRNA level was up-regulated with
progression of gestation days. There are significant upregulations of
Flk-1 mRNA on D6 and D7, compared to D4. The result also revealed
significant down-regulation of Flk-1 mRNA transcript after treatment of E2 and P4
antagonist, suggesting that Flk-1/KDR expression during periimplantation was estrogen
and progesterone dependent. All of the experiments are repeated three times. Data are
shown as mean ± SEM (P<0.05) compared to D4. E2; Estrogen, P4; Progesterone,
and qRT-PCR; Quantitative reverse transcriptase- polymerase chain reaction.
Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence of anti-E2 and anti-P4 treated mice uterus.
A. Immunohistochemistry of Flk-1/KDR using HRP-conjugated and
FITC-conjugated antibody on anti-E2 treated (A and C) and
anti-P4 treated (B and D) mice uterus. The figure showed
that Flk1/KDR was not expressed in the anti-E2 and anti-P4 treated uterus. E,
F. These figure showed normal pregnant mice with five and six days embryo and
BC for comparing with E2 and P4 antagonist treatment. Asterisk (*) showed
underdeveloped BC (scale bar: 50 μm). E2; Estrogen, P4; Progesterone, E; Embryo, and
BC; Blastocyst cavity.
Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction of
VEGFR-2 (Flk-1/KDR)
Transcription pattern of Flk-1/KDR mRNA in the mice uteri during
peri-implantation period (D4-D7) was studied by qRT-PCR using both forward and reverse
gene specific primers. The results exhibited increasing pattern of the mRNA transcript
during the period of peri-implantation (Fig.6C). qRT-PCR data showed that
Flk-1/KDR mRNA transcript was up-regulated with progression of the
gestation days. There were significant up-regulations of Flk-1 mRNA on D6 and D7, compared
to D4 (P<0.05). Flk-1/KDR mRNA transcript was up-regulated almost
four times on D7, compared to D4. Similarly on D6, Flk1/KDR mRNA
transcript was up-regulated almost three fold, compared to D4 of gestation. The result
also revealed significant down-regulation of Flk-1 mRNA transcript after
treatment of E2 and P4 antagonist, suggesting that Flk1/KDR expression is
estrogen and progesterone dependent during peri-implantation. All of the experiments were
repeated three times. Data are depicted as mean ± SEM (P<0.05), compared to D4.Western blotting and qRT-PCR analysis of Flk-1/KDR. A. Western blotting of Flk-1/KDR
during peri-implantation period (D4-D7) of gestation and in E2 and P4 antagonist
treated uterus. B. Densitometric analysis of western blotting result of
Flk-1/KDR protein. The result showed significant increase of the receptor on D7 when
compared to D4. All experiments are repeated three times. Data are shown as mean ± SEM
(P<0.05), compared to D4. C. qRT-PCR of Flk-1/KDR
during D4-D7 of gestation, in addition to the E2 and P4 antagonist treated uterus. The
result revealed that Flk-1mRNA level was up-regulated with
progression of gestation days. There are significant upregulations of
Flk-1 mRNA on D6 and D7, compared to D4. The result also revealed
significant down-regulation of Flk-1 mRNA transcript after treatment of E2 and P4
antagonist, suggesting that Flk-1/KDR expression during periimplantation was estrogen
and progesterone dependent. All of the experiments are repeated three times. Data are
shown as mean ± SEM (P<0.05) compared to D4. E2; Estrogen, P4; Progesterone,
and qRT-PCR; Quantitative reverse transcriptase- polymerase chain reaction.
Discussion
In the present study, VEGFR-2 (Flk-1/KDR) signal was
detected in the cell specific manner from D4 gestation
onward. In rodents, blastocyst implantation takes place
on D4.5 of gestation. This period is characterized by
high degree of uterine receptivity along with stromal cell
proliferation and its gradual conversion to DC. Estrogen,
progesterone and certain growth factors are decisively
involved in causing receptive uterus for successful
blastocyst implantation on D4.5 (29, 30). Expression
of VEGFR-2 (Flk-1/KDR) in uterine epithelium prior
to implantation suggests involvement of VEGF in
window preparation, neo-angiogenesis and recruitment
of leucocytes as well as invasion of the trophoblasts.
Subsequently, after implantation, significant proliferation
and differentiation of the stromal cells occur, culminated
in surrounding embryo with large, polyploid nucleus.
During this period, vascular dilation occurs at the
endometrial epithelium which facilitates invasion of the
blastocyst to the maternal stroma. This decisive event is
regulated by VEGF signaling through VEGFR-2 (Flk-1/
KDR) (5, 31).VEGFR-2 expressed on the embryonic trophectodermal cells as well as the maternal tissue at
mesometrial and anti-mesometrial pole. The embryonic trophoblastic cells at the mesometrial
end and in the fetal-maternal interface gradually transformed to trophoblastic giant cells,
which gradually invaded to the maternal tissues. The invasion of TCs was accompanied by
maternal tissue apoptosis. TCs lining BC which are also called mural TCs (MTC) and possess
the apoptotic ability. This invasion mechanism of the trophoblastic cells establishes a
fetal-maternal vascular relationship which facilitates proper nutritional support of
developing embryo (1). During this period, due to the invasion of the embryo, vascular
sinusoids (VS) starts to appear at the mesometrial side, leading to surface area increase
for further invasion of the developing embryo to the maternal tissues. TCs towards the
embryonic pole are also called polar TC, gradually started to develop EPC. An outgrowth of
TC formed top of the embryonic pole capping the embryoblast. These TCs are cuboidal in shape
and form a cap-like outgrowth which ultimately give rise to EPC. Peripheral trophoblastic
cells exert an apoptotic effect and eventually break up the adjoining uterine epithelium.
Degeneration of the stromal cells are extended all around the egg cylinder that leads to the
proliferation of polar TCs and ultimately forming EPC. During this period, VEGFR-2
(Flk-1/KDR) is expressed in an ordered manner, in both embryonic and maternal tissues.
Recent study revealed that VEGF plays crucial roles in BC formation, development of
blastocyst cells and growth during early gestation in mice (32). It is believed that the
ligand VEGF does the physiological events signaling through VEGFR-2 for programmed growth
and development of the embryo. Our earlier studies showed similar spatial-temporal
expression of VEGF-C in fetalmaternal tissue during this crucial episode of gestation (20).
It is believed that VEGF and VEGFR-2 plays pivotal role in survival of the embryo during
this critical period of embryonic invasion and growth. In our earlier study, it was showed
that any agent inducing change in biochemical milieu of maternal tissue could lead to
embryonic death and loss of normal VEGF expression. Moreover, oral administration of
methanolic crude bark extract of Dysoxylumalliarium to female rat from
gestation D1 led to embryonic death and altered expression of VEGF in both fetus and
maternal tissues (4).From D6 of gestation onward, DCs started to become
multinucleated. The multinucleated DC facilitated high
degree of protein synthesis which was a prime requirement
for the nourishment of the developing embryo (1). The TCs
of mesometrial and anti-mesometrial side neighboring
the embryo exhibited strong expression of Flk-1/KDR.
Mesometrial TCs associated with gradual invasion of
developing embryo towards the mesometrial side, forming
VS and became proliferated resulting in formation
of placenta. Anti-mesometrial TCs gave rise to form
primitive placenta in mice and rodents (21). Moreover,
decidualization of uterine stromal cells in mice underwent
specialized processing that resulted in the formation of
giant multinucleated cells by repeated DNA replication,
but without cell division called endoreduplication. This process required transition from mitotic cycle to the
endoreduplication cycle (1, 33). Our present study showed
that Flk-1/KDR expression in the multinucleated DCs
on D6 of gestation. The multinucleated DCs gradually
underwent degeneration, especially at anti-mesometrial
end causing remodeling of the implantation chamber
(34). This degeneration facilitated TCs to access maternal
blood vessels. In the present investigation, accumulation
in the giant DCs suggested VEGFR-2 protein role in
establishment of fetal-maternal cellular relationship
through vasculogenesis for further development. It is
also evident that expression of VEGFR-2 is high in the
mesometrial and anti-mesometrial side neighboring the
embryo on gestation D6. Moreover, earlier research work
showed that on D6, extensive proliferation of the stromal
cells exterior to the PDZ occured to appear SDZ around
the PDZ. This specialized zone was fully developed in D7
and PDZ was gradually degenerated by apoptosis (35).Polar TCs of embryo are highly proliferative in nature.
Proliferation of the polar TCs subsequently gives rise to
a cap like outgrowth that protrudes into the mesometrial
side and ultimately forms EPC. Formation of EPC is
the first sign of placental development. During D7 of
gestation, EPC rapidly developed and morphologically
organized in distinct cell populations: the ITCs and the
PTCs. ITC of EPC exhibits intense proliferative activity
facing the ectoplacental cavity while in the outer regions,
PTCs arises. These TCs are non-proliferating, polyploid,
invasive and phagocytic in nature. Our present study
showed that PTCs of EPC expressed Flk-1/KDR with
strong intensity. Specific expression of VEGFR-2 (Flk1/KDR) in the EPC suggested therole of this protein in
differentiation and transformation of cells during placental
formation. Research work revealed that Flk-1 null mice
died between D8.5 and D9.5, due to inability of developing
proper blood vessel network (36). In the present study,
Flk-1/KDR expression in various cells of the both fetal
and maternal tissues suggested the role of this receptor
in establishment of fetal-maternal communication during
early gestation period.It is well established that implantation is a steroid hormone dependent process. This
hormone action is essential for preparation of endometrium, among the successful
implantation. Proper timing of implantation is very essential for establishment of pregnancy
and receptivity of the uterus is attributed by estrogen and progesterone. It was found that
estrogen could initiate implantation process. Estrogen is the critical determinant of the
implantation process as estrogen primes on D4uterus triggers the uterine receptivity.
Additionally, duration of the implantation window depends on the concentration of estrogen.
Lower estrogen levels extend the implantation window, while higher level causes rapid close
of the window (37). In our experiment, it was found that receptor is not localized in the
anti-E2 and anti-P4 treated uterus. This finding suggested that Flk-1/ KDR expression in the
uterus, during peri-implantation was gonadal steroid dependent. Western blotting result
revealed presence of the receptor in the all gestation days. qRT-PCR study showed
significant up-regulation of the receptor with progression of the gestation days.
Significant down-regulation of Flk-1/KDR mRNA in the estrogen and
progesterone antagonist treated uterus, further proved that VEGFR-2 expression in the early
pregnancy period was gonadal steroid dependent.
Conclusion
Using the findings obtained from the present research
work, we can concluded that spatial-temporal expression
of Flk-1/KDR during peri-implntation period in mice
uterus, especially in the feto-maternal interface, played
a critical role in the blastocyst implantation as well as
the embryonic development which led to the successful
pregnancy. This spatio-temporal specificity could be one
of the determinants for establishment of fetal-maternal
cross talk during the critical period of development.
Authors: B Anne Croy; Zhilin Chen; Alexander P Hofmann; Edith M Lord; Abigail L Sedlacek; Scott A Gerber Journal: Biol Reprod Date: 2012-11-29 Impact factor: 4.285