Literature DB >> 33686715

Dyadic-Explanations During Preparatory Self-Study Enhance Learning: A Randomised Controlled Study.

Jerome I Rotgans1, Jennifer A Cleland1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of the present study was to investigate to which extent preparatory self-study can be improved by encouraging students to engage in individual self-explanations or dyadic-explanations (that is, in pairs). Individual self-explanations refer to an act of metacognition in which students, after having processed a certain amount of information, attempt to explain their understanding to themselves of what was just learned. Dyadic-explanations refer to the same process, but instead of explaining to oneself, the student explains his/her understanding to another student.
METHOD: An experiment was conducted in which 120 medical students studied a video-recorded lecture on the role of protein synthesis inhibition on memory reconsolidation. Participants were randomly allocated to one of four conditions: (1) a control condition in which they listened to the lecture once; (2) a control condition in which they listened to the lecture twice; (3) an experimental condition in which they had to listen to the lecture and provide self-explanations individually; and (4) an experimental condition in which they had to listen to the lecture and provide dyadic-explanations. Participants' knowledge regarding the topic was measured three times; at the start and end of the experiment, and one week after the experiment to determine knowledge retention. Data were analysed by means of a 2*2 and 4*3 repeated-measures ANOVA.
RESULTS: The results suggest that participants who engaged in individual self- or dyadic-explanations significantly outperformed participants in the two control conditions in terms of learning and retention (F = 5.67, Wilks Λ = 0.94, P = 0.019, η2 = 0.05). Moreover, the results suggest that dyadic-explanations were more effective than individual self-explanations (F = 3.70, Wilks Λ = 0.83, P = 0.002, η2 = 0.09).
CONCLUSIONS: These outcomes suggest that encouraging students to work in pairs or in small teams to prepare for a learning event results in superior preparation and learning. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Knowledge acquisition; preparation phase; preparatory self-study; prior knowledge; self-explanations

Year:  2021        PMID: 33686715     DOI: 10.1111/medu.14519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  1 in total

1.  Does group size matter during collaborative skills learning? A randomised study.

Authors:  Laerke Marijke Noerholk; Anne Mette Morcke; Kulamakan Kulasegaram; Lone N Nørgaard; Lotte Harmsen; Lisbeth Anita Andreasen; Nina Gros Pedersen; Vilma Johnsson; Anishan Vamadevan; Martin Grønnebaek Tolsgaard
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 7.647

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.