Literature DB >> 33686429

Is there still a rationale for non-invasive PGT-A by analysis of cell-free DNA released by human embryos into culture medium?

Raoul Orvieto1,2, Adva Aizer1, Norbert Gleicher3,4,5,6.   

Abstract

Human embryos utilise an array of processes to eliminate the very high prevalence of aneuploid cells in early embryo stages. Human embryo self-correction was recently demonstrated by their ability to eliminate/expel abnormal blastomeres as cell debris/fragments. A whole genome amplification study has demonstrated that 63.6% of blastocysts expelled cell debris with abnormal chromosomal rearrangements. Moreover, 55.5% of euploid blastocysts expel aneuploid debris, strongly suggesting that the primary source of cell free DNA in culture media is expelled aneuploid blastomeres and/or their fragments. Such a substantial ability to self-correct downstream from the blastocyststage, therefore, renders any chromosomal diagnosis at the blastocyststage potentially useless, and this, unfortunately, also must particularly include non-invasive PGT-A based on cell-free DNA in spent medium. High rates of false-positive diagnoses of human embryos often lead to non-use and/or disposal of embryos with entirely normal pregnancy potential. Before adopting yet another round of unvalidated PGT-A as a routine adjunct to IVF, we here present facts that deserve to be considered.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assisted reproductive technique / cell-free DNA / human embryos / in-vitro fertilisation / non-invasive / preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy / self-correction

Year:  2021        PMID: 33686429     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  5 in total

1.  Validation of Non-Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Screening Using a Routine IVF Laboratory Workflow.

Authors:  Ni-Chin Tsai; Yun-Chiao Chang; Yi-Ru Su; Yi-Chi Lin; Pei-Ling Weng; Yin-Hua Cheng; Yi-Ling Li; Kuo-Chung Lan
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-06-11

2.  Karyotype of the Blastocoel Fluid Derived by Laser-Assisted Hatching Demonstrates a Low Agreement With the Trophectoderm.

Authors:  Liang Wang; Wenjuan Pang; Yi Zhang; Min Hao; Yan Liu; Xiang Wang; Ningxia Sun
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 3.  Non-Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy and the Mystery of Genetic Material: A Review Article.

Authors:  Maja Tomic; Eda Vrtacnik Bokal; Martin Stimpfel
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  Revisiting selected ethical aspects of current clinical in vitro fertilization (IVF) practice.

Authors:  Anja von Schondorf-Gleicher; Lyka Mochizuki; Raoul Orvieto; Pasquale Patrizio; Arthur S Caplan; Norbert Gleicher
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Development of an artificial intelligence model for predicting the likelihood of human embryo euploidy based on blastocyst images from multiple imaging systems during IVF.

Authors:  S M Diakiw; J M M Hall; M D VerMilyea; J Amin; J Aizpurua; L Giardini; Y G Briones; A Y X Lim; M A Dakka; T V Nguyen; D Perugini; M Perugini
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 6.353

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.