Literature DB >> 33686152

Use of catheter with 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine polymer coating is associated with long-term availability of central venous port.

Yuuki Iida1, Kumiko Hongo2, Takanobu Onoda2, Yusuke Kita2, Yukio Ishihara2, Naoki Takabayashi2, Ryo Kobayashi2, Takeyuki Hiramatsu2.   

Abstract

Central venous port (CVP) is a widely used totally implantable venous access device. Recognition of risks associated with CVP-related complications is clinically important for safe, reliable, and long-term intravenous access. We therefore investigated factors associated with CVP infection and evulsion, including the device type. A total of 308 consecutive patients with initial CVP implantation between January 2011 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed, and the association of clinical features with CVP-related complications were analyzed. Intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred in 11 (3.6%) and 39 (12.7%) patients, respectively. The overall rate of CVP availability at six months was 91.4%. Malignancy and 2-Methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC) polymer-coated catheter use were negatively associated with the incidence of CVP infections. Accordingly, malignancy and MPC polymer-coated catheter use were independent predictors for lower CVP evulsion rate (odds ratio, 0.23 and 0.18, respectively). Furthermore, both factors were significantly associated with longer CVP availability (hazard ratio, 0.24 and 0.27, respectively). This retrospective study identified factors associated with CVP-related complications and long-term CVP availability. Notably, MPC polymer-coated catheter use was significantly associated with a lower rate of CVP infection and longer CVP availability, suggesting the preventive effect of MPC coating on CVP infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33686152      PMCID: PMC7940397          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84885-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  14 in total

1.  Predictors of bloodstream infection associated with permanently implantable venous port in solid cancer patients.

Authors:  I C Chen; C Hsu; Y C Chen; S F Chien; H F Kao; S Y Chang; F C Hu; K H Yeh
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Incidence and risk factors for central venous access port-related infection in Chinese cancer patients.

Authors:  Ting-Yao Wang; Kuan-Der Lee; Ping-Tsung Chen; Min-Chi Chen; Yi-Yang Chen; Cih-En Huang; Feng-Che Kuan; Chih-Cheng Chen; Chang Hsien Lu
Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Risk factors for infectious and noninfectious complications of totally implantable venous catheters in cancer patients.

Authors:  Antonio Eduardo Zerati; Tamires Rocha Figueredo; Richard Diego de Moraes; Amanda Monteiro da Cruz; Joaquim Mauricio da Motta-Leal Filho; Maristela Pinheiro Freire; Nelson Wolosker; Nelson de Luccia
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord       Date:  2016-04

4.  Clinical Predictors of Port Infections in Adult Patients with Hematologic Malignancies.

Authors:  Shunqing Zhang; Katsuhiro Kobayashi; Masoud Faridnia; Philip Skummer; Dianbo Zhang; Mitchel I Karmel
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  Complications after implantation of subcutaneous central venous ports (PowerPort).

Authors:  Takatoshi Nakamura; Jiichiro Sasaki; Yasushi Asari; Takeo Sato; Shinzo Torii; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2017-03-10

Review 6.  Complications of central venous port systems: a pictorial review.

Authors:  Sibylle Machat; Edith Eisenhuber; Georg Pfarl; Josef Stübler; Claus Koelblinger; Johannes Zacherl; Wolfgang Schima
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2019-08-28

7.  Comparison of subcutaneous central venous port via jugular and subclavian access in 347 patients at a single center.

Authors:  Bilgin Kadri Aribaş; Kemal Arda; Ozge Aribaş; Nazan Ciledağ; Zeynel Yoloğlu; Elif Aktaş; Turgut Seber; Seyhmus Kavak; Yusuf Coşar; Hidir Kaygusuz; Ekrem Tekin
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  A case-control study to identify risk factors for totally implantable central venous port-related bloodstream infection.

Authors:  Guk Jin Lee; Sook Hee Hong; Sang Young Roh; Sa Rah Park; Myung Ah Lee; Hoo Geun Chun; Young Seon Hong; Jin Hyoung Kang; Sang Il Kim; Youn Jeong Kim; Ho Jong Chun; Jung Suk Oh
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.679

9.  A retrospective analysis on the utility and complications of upper arm ports in 433 cases at a single institute.

Authors:  Yukiko Mori; Satoshi Nagayama; Jun-Ichiro Kawamura; Suguru Hasegawa; Eiji Tanaka; Hiroshi Okabe; Megumi Takeuchi; Makoto Sonobe; Shigemi Matsumoto; Masashi Kanai; Manabu Muto; Tsutomu Chiba; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  2-Methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC)-polymer suppresses an increase of oral bacteria: a single-blind, crossover clinical trial.

Authors:  Natsumi Fujiwara; Hiromichi Yumoto; Koji Miyamoto; Katsuhiko Hirota; Hiromi Nakae; Saya Tanaka; Keiji Murakami; Yasusei Kudo; Kazumi Ozaki; Yoichiro Miyake
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Biomimetic materials based on zwitterionic polymers toward human-friendly medical devices.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Ishihara
Journal:  Sci Technol Adv Mater       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 7.821

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.