Literature DB >> 33686113

Slow life history leaves endangered snake vulnerable to illegal collecting.

Chris J Jolly1,2,3, Brenton Von Takach4, Jonathan K Webb5.   

Abstract

Global wildlife trade is a multibillion-dollar industry and a significant driver of vertebrate extinction risk. Yet, few studies have quantified the impact of wild harvesting for the illicit pet trade on populations. Long-lived species, by virtue of their slow life history characteristics, may be unable to sustain even low levels of collecting. Here, we assessed the impact of illegal collecting on populations of endangered broad-headed snakes (Hoplocephalus bungaroides) at gated (protected) and ungated (unprotected) sites. Because broad-headed snakes are long-lived, grow slowly and reproduce infrequently, populations are likely vulnerable to increases in adult mortality. Long-term data revealed that annual survival rates of snakes were significantly lower in the ungated population than the gated population, consistent with the hypothesis of human removal of snakes for the pet trade. Population viability analysis showed that the ungated population has a strongly negative population growth rate and is only prevented from ultimate extinction by dispersal of small numbers of individuals from the gated population. Sensitivity analyses showed that the removal of a small number of adult females was sufficient to impose negative population growth and suggests that threatened species with slow life histories are likely to be especially vulnerable to illegal collecting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33686113      PMCID: PMC7970890          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84745-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  18 in total

1.  The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes.

Authors:  J A Thomas; N A Bourn; R T Clarke; K E Stewart; D J Simcox; G S Pearman; R Curtis; B Goodger
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Scientific description can imperil species.

Authors:  Bryan L Stuart; Anders G J Rhodin; L Lee Grismer; Troy Hansel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Global trade in exotic pets 2006-2012.

Authors:  Emma R Bush; Sandra E Baker; David W Macdonald
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  Biodiversity: The ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers.

Authors:  Sean L Maxwell; Richard A Fuller; Thomas M Brooks; James E M Watson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Global wildlife trade across the tree of life.

Authors:  Brett R Scheffers; Brunno F Oliveira; Ieuan Lamb; David P Edwards
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Impacts of wildlife trade on terrestrial biodiversity.

Authors:  Oscar Morton; Brett R Scheffers; Torbjørn Haugaasen; David P Edwards
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 15.460

7.  Habitat selection in a rocky landscape: experimentally decoupling the influence of retreat site attributes from that of landscape features.

Authors:  Benjamin M Croak; David A Pike; Jonathan K Webb; Richard Shine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Jungle Giants: Assessing Sustainable Harvesting in a Difficult-to-Survey Species (Python reticulatus).

Authors:  Daniel J D Natusch; Jessica A Lyons; Awal Riyanto; Richard Shine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Summarizing the evidence on the international trade in illegal wildlife.

Authors:  Gail Emilia Rosen; Katherine F Smith
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 3.184

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.