Literature DB >> 33686096

People prefer joint outcome prosocial resource distribution towards future others.

Yukako Inoue1, Toshiyuki Himichi2,3, Nobuhiro Mifune1,4, Tatsuyoshi Saijo1,4,5.   

Abstract

Today, developing and maintaining sustainable societies is becoming a notable social concern, and studies on altruism and prosociality toward future generations are increasing in importance. Although altruistic behaviors toward future generations have previously been observed in some experimental situations, it remains unknown whether prosocial preferences toward future others are based on equality or joint outcome orientations. In the present research, we exploratorily investigated preferences regarding resource distribution by manipulating the time points (i.e., present/future) of the participants and their imaginary partners. The results indicate that prosocial preference toward future others was as strong as that toward present others and seemed to be based on a joint outcome prosocial preference. Notably, when participants and their partners were at different time points, participants preferred to leave resources for the persons in the future. The findings indicate that the type of altruistic preference toward future others may differ from that toward present others, which is mainly equality.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33686096     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84796-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  12 in total

Review 1.  Temporal construal.

Authors:  Yaacov Trope; Nira Liberman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategy effects in prisoner's dilemma.

Authors:  D M Kuhlman; A F Marshello
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1975-11

3.  Prosocials prefer equal outcomes to maximizing joint outcomes.

Authors:  Daniel Eek; Tommy Gärling
Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol       Date:  2006-06

4.  Are social value orientations expressed automatically? Decision making in the dictator game.

Authors:  Gert Cornelissen; Siegfried Dewitte; Luk Warlop
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2011-04-25

Review 5.  The effects of psychological distance on abstraction: Two meta-analyses.

Authors:  Courtney K Soderberg; Shannon P Callahan; Annie O Kochersberger; Elinor Amit; Alison Ledgerwood
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Cooperating with the future.

Authors:  Oliver P Hauser; David G Rand; Alexander Peysakhovich; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: a review and conceptual model.

Authors:  Sandy Bogaert; Christophe Boone; Carolyn Declerck
Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol       Date:  2007-10-03

8.  Delaying rewards has greater effect on altruism when the beneficiary is socially distant.

Authors:  Jerzy Osiński; Adam Karbowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Inhibition of the right dlPFC by theta burst stimulation does not alter sustainable decision-making.

Authors:  Benedikt P Langenbach; Thomas Baumgartner; Dario Cazzoli; René M Müri; Daria Knoch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Negotiating with the future: incorporating imaginary future generations into negotiations.

Authors:  Yoshio Kamijo; Asuka Komiya; Nobuhiro Mifune; Tatsuyoshi Saijo
Journal:  Sustain Sci       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 6.367

View more
  1 in total

1.  Regret Now, Compensate It Later: The Benefits of Experienced Regret on Future Altruism.

Authors:  Teng Lu; Dapeng Liang; Mei Hong; Jiayin Sun
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.