Literature DB >> 33685969

Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation or surveillance in patients with Barrett's oesophagus with confirmed low-grade dysplasia: a multicentre randomised trial.

Frederic Prat1, Stanislas Chaussade1, Maximilien Barret2, Mathieu Pioche3, Benoit Terris4, Thierry Ponchon5, Franck Cholet6, Frank Zerbib7, Edouard Chabrun7, Marc Le Rhun8, Emmanuel Coron8, Marc Giovannini9, Fabrice Caillol9, René Laugier10, Jeremie Jacques11, Romain Legros11, Christian Boustiere12, Gabriel Rahmi13, Elodie Metivier-Cesbron14, Geoffroy Vanbiervliet15, Paul Bauret16, Jean Escourrou17, Julien Branche18, Lea Jilet19, Hendy Abdoul19, Nadira Kaddour19, Sarah Leblanc1, Michael Bensoussan20.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Due to an annual progression rate of Barrett's oesophagus (BO) with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) between 9% and 13% per year endoscopic ablation therapy is preferred to surveillance. Since this recommendation is based on only one randomised trial, we aimed at checking these results by another multicentre randomised trial with a similar design.
DESIGN: A prospective randomised study was performed in 14 centres comparing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (maximum of 4 sessions) to annual endoscopic surveillance, including patients with a confirmed diagnosis of BO with LGD. Primary outcome was the prevalence of LGD at 3 years. Secondary outcomes were the prevalence of LGD at 1 year, the complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) at 3 years, the rate of neoplastic progression at 3 years and the treatment-related morbidity.
RESULTS: 125 patients were initially included, of whom 82 with confirmed LGD (76 men, mean age 62.3 years) were finally randomised, 40 patients in the RFA and 42 in the surveillance group. At 3 years, CE-IM rates were 35% vs 0% in the RFA and surveillance groups, respectively (p<0.001). At the same time, the prevalence LGD was 34.3% (95% CI 18.6 to 50.0) in the RFA group vs 58.1% (95% CI 40.7 to 75.4) in the surveillance group (OR=0.38 (95% CI 0.14 to 1.02), p=0.05). Neoplastic progression was found in 12.5% (RFA) vs 26.2% (surveillance; p=0.15). The complication rate was maximal after the first RFA treatment (16.9%).
CONCLUSION: RFA modestly reduced the prevalence of LGD as well as progression risk at 3 years. The risk-benefit balance of endoscopic ablation therapy should therefore be carefully weighted against surveillance in patients with BO with confirmed LGD. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01360541. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barrett's oesophagus; dysplasia; endoscopic procedures; oesophageal cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33685969     DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  6 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic Management of Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Jennifer M Kolb; Sachin Wani
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Today's Mistakes and Tomorrow's Wisdom in Endoscopic Treatment and Follow-Up of Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Maximilien Barret
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2022-03-18

3.  Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Surveillance Versus Endoscopic Therapy for Barrett's Esophagus With Low-grade Dysplasia: The SURVENT Trial: Study Rationale, Methodology, Innovation, and Implications.

Authors:  Sachin Wani; Rhonda F Souza; Valerie L Durkalski; Jose Serrano; Frank Hamilton; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 33.883

Review 4.  Endoscopic Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus with Low-Grade Dysplasia.

Authors:  Francesco Maione; Alessia Chini; Rosa Maione; Michele Manigrasso; Alessandra Marello; Gianluca Cassese; Nicola Gennarelli; Marco Milone; Giovanni Domenico De Palma
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-23

5.  Efficacy and Safety of Radiofrequency Ablation vs. Endoscopic Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus With Low-Grade Dysplasia: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Yizi Wang; Bin Ma; Shize Yang; Wenya Li; Peiwen Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 6.  Barrett's esophagus: Review of natural history and comparative efficacy of endoscopic and surgical therapies.

Authors:  Kevin Kyung Ho Choi; Santosh Sanagapalli
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-03-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.