Literature DB >> 33685894

In Vitro Activity of Vancapticin MCC5145 against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

Hye-Kyung Cho1, Melissa J Karau1, Kerryl E Greenwood-Quaintance1, Karl A Hansford2, Matthew A Cooper2, Mark A T Blaskovich3, Robin Patel4,5.   

Abstract

MRSA periprosthetic 1 joint infection (PJI) can be challenging to treat due to biofilm formation, alongside sometimes limited vancomycin activity (1-3).….
Copyright © 2021 Cho et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33685894      PMCID: PMC8092875          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02443-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


LETTER

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be challenging to treat due to biofilm formation, alongside sometimes limited vancomycin activity (1–3). Vancapticins are semisynthetic vancomycin derivatives with membrane-targeting motifs added to the C terminus, resulting in enhanced affinity and avidity for membrane-bound lipid II, the vancomycin target (4, 5). Supplementation with 0.002% polysorbate 80 (P-80) is recommended to prevent adherence to plastic surfaces when determining MICs of the lipoglycopeptides telavancin, dalbavancin, and oritavancin (6, 7). Vancapticins, which have structures similar to those of other lipoglycopeptides, are positively charged and adhere to plastic surfaces, thereby hypothetically benefitting from the addition of P-80, with similar improvements in MICs obtained using nonbinding plates (8). Vancapticin MCC5145 MICs of 37 PJI-associated MRSA isolates collected from 2000 to 2016 were determined using broth microdilution with and without P-80 (6, 7). Minimum biofilm inhibitory concentrations (MBICs) and minimum biofilm bactericidal concentrations (MBBCs) were determined as described previously (9) (Table 1). Median MIC, MBIC, and MBBC values were 8-, 8-, and 4-fold lower, respectively, when supplemented with versus without P-80. Results were compared to those previously determined using the same isolates for vancomycin, dalbavancin, and oritavancin, except that two isolates were excluded from comparative analysis to vancomycin and dalbavancin (9–11). The MIC90 of 0.12 μg/ml (with P-80) was comparable to those of dalbavancin and oritavancin (0.06 and 0.12 μg/ml, respectively) and lower than that of vancomycin (2 μg/ml) (9–11). The MBIC90 of 0.12 μg/ml (with P-80) was comparable to that of dalbavancin (0.25 μg/ml) (10) and lower than those of oritavancin and vancomycin (both 2 μg/ml) (9, 11). The MBBC90 (with P-80) of 2 μg/ml was comparable to those of dalbavancin and oritavancin (2 and 4 μg/ml) (9, 10) and lower than that of vancomycin (>128 μg/ml) (11).
TABLE 1

MCC5145 MIC, MBIC, and MBBC of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (n = 37)

Inhibitory or bactericidal concn type and test agent(s)No. of isolates (cumulative percentage) with MIC, MBIC, or MBBC at concn [μg/ml (%)] of:
MIC50, MBIC50, or MBBC50 (μg/ml)MIC90, MBIC90, or MBBC90 (μg/ml)
0.0150.030.060.120.250.51248
MIC
MCC5145 without P-8018 (48.6)17 (94.6)2 (100)0.50.5
MCC5145 with P-803 (8.1)1 (10.8)27 (83.8)6 (100)0.060.12
MBIC
MCC5145 without P-805 (13.5)21 (70.3)9 (94.6)2 (100)0.51
MCC5145 with P-801 (2.7)19 (54.1)17 (100)0.060.12
MBBC
MCC5145 without P-801 (2.7)19 (54.1)9 (78.4)8 (100)28
MCC5145 with P-802 (5.4)11 (35.1)15 (75.7)8 (97.3)1 (100)12
MCC5145 MIC, MBIC, and MBBC of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (n = 37) When comparing the MCC5145 and vancomycin susceptibility of three quality control strains with or without P-80, MCC5145 MICs, MBICs, and MBBCs without P-80 were 4- to 64-, 2- to 16-, and 2- to 4-fold higher, respectively, than those with P-80, whereas vancomycin showed similar values with or without P-80 (Table 2).
TABLE 2

MCC5145 and vancomycin MIC, MBIC, and MBBC of three quality control Staphylococcus aureus strains with and without P-80

StrainMCC5145
Vancomycin
MIC (μg/ml)
MBIC (μg/ml)
MBBC (μg/ml)
MIC (μg/ml)
MBIC (μg/ml)
MBBC (μg/ml)
+P80−P80+P80−P80+P80−P80+P80−P80+P80−P80+P80−P80
ATCC 43300 (methicillin resistant)0.060.250.060.5242212128>128
ATCC 29213 (methicillin susceptible)0.01510.0610.522112128>128
ATCC 25923 (methicillin susceptible)0.060.5124822281632
MCC5145 and vancomycin MIC, MBIC, and MBBC of three quality control Staphylococcus aureus strains with and without P-80 Biofilm time-kill assays were performed as previously described (12) using 10 PJI isolates (Table 3). Biofilms on Teflon coupons were treated with 1× MBBC for dalbavancin and MCC5145 and fC (free plasma concentration) for vancomycin (16 μg/ml [13]). MCC5145 reduced biofilms of 3 of 10 isolates after 8 h and 7 of 10 after 24 h compared with controls (Fig. 1). MCC5145 with P-80 reduced biofilms of 3 of 10 isolates after 8 h and 6 of 10 after 24 h compared with controls. Vancomycin reduced biofilms of 3 of 10 isolates after 8 h and all 10 isolates after 24 h compared with controls. Dalbavancin with P-80 did not reduce biofilms after 8 h for any isolate; however, there was a reduction after 24 h for 4 of 10 isolates compared with controls. Bactericidal activity, defined as ≥3-log10 CFU/cm2 reduction between 0 and 24 h (12), was not observed after 8 or 24 h for MCC5145, MCC5145 with P-80, vancomycin, or dalbavancin with P-80.
TABLE 3

MIC and MBBC values of each antimicrobial agent for 10 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates

IsolateMIC (μg/ml)
MBBC (μg/ml)
MCC5145MCC5145 with P-80VancomycinaDalbavancin with P-80bMCC5145MCC5145 with P-80VancomycinaDalbavancinwith P-80b
IDRL-61690.250.01510.0310.5>1281
IDRL-71260.250.0610.0341>1281
IDRL-76800.250.0620.0320.25>1281
IDRL-83020.50.0620.0324>1281
IDRL-84540.50.0610.0321>1282
IDRL-84590.250.0610.0621>1284
IDRL-85080.250.0610.0320.5>1282
IDRL-91210.250.0610.0321>1281
IDRL-93370.50.0610.2541>1281
IDRL-114680.250.0620.0622>1288

Vancomycin MIC and MBBC values are from a previous study (11), except for those for IDRL-11468; the MIC and MBBC of IDRL-11468 were tested in this study.

Dalbavancin with P-80 MIC and MBBC values are from a previous study (10), except for those for IDRL-11468; the MIC and MBBC of IDRL-11468 were tested in this study.

FIG 1

Biofilm time-kill curves of 10 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates. (A) IDRL-6169, (B) IDRL-7126, (C) IDRL-7680, (D) IDRL-8302, (E) IDRL-8454, (F) IDRL-8459, (G) IDRL-8508, (H) IDRL-9121, (I) IDRL-9337, and (J) IDRL-11468. All isolates were tested with MCC5145 with and without P-80 and dalbavancin with P-80 at 1× MBBC, and with vancomycin at the fC. *, P < 0.05 compared with the no treatment group at each time point by two-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. Data presented are means (n = 3).

Biofilm time-kill curves of 10 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates. (A) IDRL-6169, (B) IDRL-7126, (C) IDRL-7680, (D) IDRL-8302, (E) IDRL-8454, (F) IDRL-8459, (G) IDRL-8508, (H) IDRL-9121, (I) IDRL-9337, and (J) IDRL-11468. All isolates were tested with MCC5145 with and without P-80 and dalbavancin with P-80 at 1× MBBC, and with vancomycin at the fC. *, P < 0.05 compared with the no treatment group at each time point by two-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. Data presented are means (n = 3). MIC and MBBC values of each antimicrobial agent for 10 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates Vancomycin MIC and MBBC values are from a previous study (11), except for those for IDRL-11468; the MIC and MBBC of IDRL-11468 were tested in this study. Dalbavancin with P-80 MIC and MBBC values are from a previous study (10), except for those for IDRL-11468; the MIC and MBBC of IDRL-11468 were tested in this study. Vancapticin MCC5145 has promising in vitro activity against PJI-associated MRSA but was not bactericidal against biofilms on Teflon. The addition of P-80 decreased MCC5145 MICs, MBICs, and MBBCs.
  11 in total

1.  In vitro activity of tedizolid against staphylococci isolated from prosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  Suzannah M Schmidt-Malan; Kerryl E Greenwood Quaintance; Melissa J Karau; Robin Patel
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.803

2.  In vitro activity of dalbavancin against biofilms of staphylococci isolated from prosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  Javier Fernández; Kerryl E Greenwood-Quaintance; Robin Patel
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 2.803

3.  Comparative in vitro activity of oritavancin and other agents against methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Debora Sweeney; Dean L Shinabarger; Francis F Arhin; Adam Belley; Greg Moeck; Chris M Pillar
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 2.803

4.  Pneumonia Caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Does Vancomycin Heteroresistance Matter?

Authors:  Kimberly C Claeys; Abdalhamid M Lagnf; Jessica A Hallesy; Matthew T Compton; Alison L Gravelin; Susan L Davis; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Epidemiological and microbiological characterization of infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin, United States, 1997-2001.

Authors:  Scott K Fridkin; Jeff Hageman; Linda K McDougal; Jasmine Mohammed; William R Jarvis; Trish M Perl; Fred C Tenover
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2003-01-31       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Evaluation of Oritavancin Combinations with Rifampin, Gentamicin, or Linezolid against Prosthetic Joint Infection-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms by Time-Kill Assays.

Authors:  Qun Yan; Melissa J Karau; Yash S Raval; Robin Patel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Protein-inspired antibiotics active against vancomycin- and daptomycin-resistant bacteria.

Authors:  Mark A T Blaskovich; Karl A Hansford; Yujing Gong; Mark S Butler; Craig Muldoon; Johnny X Huang; Soumya Ramu; Alberto B Silva; Mu Cheng; Angela M Kavanagh; Zyta Ziora; Rajaratnam Premraj; Fredrik Lindahl; Tanya A Bradford; June C Lee; Tomislav Karoli; Ruby Pelingon; David J Edwards; Maite Amado; Alysha G Elliott; Wanida Phetsang; Noor Huda Daud; Johan E Deecke; Hanna E Sidjabat; Sefetogi Ramaologa; Johannes Zuegg; Jason R Betley; Andrew P G Beevers; Richard A G Smith; Jason A Roberts; David L Paterson; Matthew A Cooper
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Developments in Glycopeptide Antibiotics.

Authors:  Mark A T Blaskovich; Karl A Hansford; Mark S Butler; ZhiGuang Jia; Alan E Mark; Matthew A Cooper
Journal:  ACS Infect Dis       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 5.084

9.  Effects of Microplate Type and Broth Additives on Microdilution MIC Susceptibility Assays.

Authors:  Angela Kavanagh; Soumya Ramu; Yujing Gong; Matthew A Cooper; Mark A T Blaskovich
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Epidemiology of Vancomycin-Intermediate and Heterogeneous Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Isolates.

Authors:  Shanshan Zhang; Xiaoxi Sun; Wenjiao Chang; Yuanyuan Dai; Xiaoling Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.