Tetsuo Shoji1,2, Shinya Nakatani3, Daijiro Kabata4, Katsuhito Mori5, Ayumi Shintani4, Hisako Yoshida4, Kanae Takahashi4, Keiko Ota6, Hisako Fujii7, Shinichiro Ueda8, Shinichi Nishi9, Tatsuya Nakatani10, Minoru Yoshiyama11, Kiyoshi Goto12, Takayoshi Hamada13, Masahito Imanishi14, Eiji Ishimura15, Sosuke Kagitani16, Yoshikazu Kato17, Yasuro Kumeda18, Kiyoshi Maekawa19, Takayasu Matsumura20, Harumi Nagayama21, Yasue Obi22, Yoshiteru Ohno23, Yoshinori Sai24, Mayumi Sakurai25, Satoshi Sasaki26, Kaori Shidara27, Shigeichi Shoji28, Yoshihiro Tsujimoto29, Kenjiro Yamakawa30, Hideaki Yasuda31, Shozo Yodoi32, Masaaki Inaba2,3,5, Masanori Emoto2,3,5. 1. Department of Vascular Medicine, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan t-shoji@med.osaka-cu.ac.jp. 2. Vascular Science Center for Translational Research, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan. 3. Department of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Molecular Medicine, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan. 4. Department of Medical Statistics, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan. 5. Department of Nephrology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan. 6. Center for Clinical Research and Innovation, Osaka City University Hospital, Osaka, Japan. 7. Department of Drug and Food Evaluation, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan. 8. Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan. 9. Division of Nephrology and Kidney Center, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan. 10. Department of Urology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan. 11. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan. 12. Ono Naika Clinic, Osaka, Japan. 13. Marie Clinic, Higashi Osaka, Japan. 14. Ishikiri Seiki Hospital, Higashi Osaka, Japan. 15. Meijibashi Hospital, Matsubara, Japan. 16. Kawamura Clinic, Osaka, Japan. 17. Shirasagi Minami Clinic, Osaka, Japan. 18. Minami Osaka Clinic, Osaka, Japan. 19. Fujiidera Shirasagi Clinic, Fujiidera, Japan. 20. Ikeda Hospital, Higashi Osaka, Japan. 21. Nagayama Clinic, Sennan-gun, Japan. 22. Obi Clinic, Osaka, Japan. 23. Ohno Memorial Hospital, Osaka, Japan. 24. Suminodo Clinic, Daito, Japan. 25. Jurakukai Clinic, Osaka, Japan. 26. Sasaki Medical Clinic, Osaka, Japan. 27. Ikeda Clinic, Higashi Osaka, Japan. 28. Shirasagi Hospital, Osaka, Japan t-shoji@med.osaka-cu.ac.jp. 29. Aijinkai Healthcare Corporation Inoue Hospital, Suita, Japan. 30. Shirasagi Clinic, Osaka, Japan. 31. Okada Clinic, Osaka, Japan. 32. Yodoi Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Vitamin D receptor activators and calcimimetics (calcium-sensing receptor agonists) are two major options for medical treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism. A higher serum calcification propensity (a shorter T50 value) is a novel surrogate marker of calcification stress and mortality in patients with CKD. We tested a hypothesis that a calcimimetic agent etelcalcetide is more effective in increasing T50 value than a vitamin D receptor activator maxacalcitol. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: A randomized, multicenter, open-label, blinded end point trial with active control was conducted in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism undergoing hemodialysis in Japan. Patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous etelcalcetide 5 mg thrice weekly (etelcalcetide group) or intravenous maxacalcitol 5 or 10 µg thrice weekly (maxacalcitol group). The primary, secondary, and tertiary outcomes were changes in T50 value, handgrip strength, and score of the Dementia Assessment Sheet for Community-Based Integrated Care System from baseline to 12 months, respectively. RESULTS: In total, 425 patients from 23 dialysis centers were screened for eligibility, 326 patients were randomized (etelcalcetide, n=167; control, n=159), and 321 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (median age, 66 years; 113 women [35%]). The median (interquartile range) of T50 value was changed from 116 minutes (interquartile range, 90-151) to 131 minutes (interquartile range, 102-176) in the maxacalcitol group, whereas it was changed from 123 minutes (interquartile range, 98-174) to 166 minutes (interquartile range, 127-218) in the etelcalcetide group. The increase in T50 value was significantly greater in the etelcalcetide group (difference in change, 20 minutes; 95% confidence interval, 7 to 34 minutes; P=0.004). No significant between-group difference was found in the change in handgrip strength or in the Dementia Assessment Sheet for Community-Based Integrated Care System score. CONCLUSIONS: Etelcalcetide was more effective in increasing T50 value than maxacalcitol among patients on hemodialysis with secondary hyperparathyroidism. There was no difference in handgrip strength or cognition between the two drugs. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: VICTORY; UMIN000030636 and jRCTs051180156.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Vitamin D receptor activators and calcimimetics (calcium-sensing receptor agonists) are two major options for medical treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism. A higher serum calcification propensity (a shorter T50 value) is a novel surrogate marker of calcification stress and mortality in patients with CKD. We tested a hypothesis that a calcimimetic agent etelcalcetide is more effective in increasing T50 value than a vitamin D receptor activator maxacalcitol. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: A randomized, multicenter, open-label, blinded end point trial with active control was conducted in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism undergoing hemodialysis in Japan. Patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous etelcalcetide 5 mg thrice weekly (etelcalcetide group) or intravenous maxacalcitol 5 or 10 µg thrice weekly (maxacalcitol group). The primary, secondary, and tertiary outcomes were changes in T50 value, handgrip strength, and score of the Dementia Assessment Sheet for Community-Based Integrated Care System from baseline to 12 months, respectively. RESULTS: In total, 425 patients from 23 dialysis centers were screened for eligibility, 326 patients were randomized (etelcalcetide, n=167; control, n=159), and 321 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (median age, 66 years; 113 women [35%]). The median (interquartile range) of T50 value was changed from 116 minutes (interquartile range, 90-151) to 131 minutes (interquartile range, 102-176) in the maxacalcitol group, whereas it was changed from 123 minutes (interquartile range, 98-174) to 166 minutes (interquartile range, 127-218) in the etelcalcetide group. The increase in T50 value was significantly greater in the etelcalcetide group (difference in change, 20 minutes; 95% confidence interval, 7 to 34 minutes; P=0.004). No significant between-group difference was found in the change in handgrip strength or in the Dementia Assessment Sheet for Community-Based Integrated Care System score. CONCLUSIONS: Etelcalcetide was more effective in increasing T50 value than maxacalcitol among patients on hemodialysis with secondary hyperparathyroidism. There was no difference in handgrip strength or cognition between the two drugs. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: VICTORY; UMIN000030636 and jRCTs051180156.
Authors: Charlotte A Keyzer; Martin H de Borst; Else van den Berg; Willi Jahnen-Dechent; Spyridon Arampatzis; Stefan Farese; Ivo P Bergmann; Jürgen Floege; Gerjan Navis; Stephan J L Bakker; Harry van Goor; Ute Eisenberger; Andreas Pasch Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Andreas Pasch; Geoffrey A Block; Matthias Bachtler; Edward R Smith; Wilhelm Jahnen-Dechent; Spyridon Arampatzis; Glenn M Chertow; Patrick Parfrey; Xiaoye Ma; Juergen Floege Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2016-12-09 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Joshua W Miller; Danielle J Harvey; Laurel A Beckett; Ralph Green; Sarah Tomaszewski Farias; Bruce R Reed; John M Olichney; Dan M Mungas; Charles DeCarli Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Ilse S Wicherts; Natasja M van Schoor; A Joan P Boeke; Marjolein Visser; Dorly J H Deeg; Jan Smit; Dirk L Knol; Paul Lips Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2007-03-06 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Katharina Dörr; Sebastian Hödlmoser; Michael Kammer; Roman Reindl-Schwaighofer; Matthias Lorenz; Bianca Reiskopf; Rahel Jagoditsch; Rodrig Marculescu; Rainer Oberbauer Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2022-07-06