Literature DB >> 33685515

Content analysis of promotional material for asthma-related products and therapies on Instagram.

Brent Heineman1,2, Marcella Jewell1,3, Michael Moran1, Kolbi Bradley1, Kerry A Spitzer4, Peter K Lindenauer1,5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increasingly, social media is a source for information about health and disease self-management. We conducted a content analysis of promotional asthma-related posts on Instagram to understand whether promoted products and services are consistent with the recommendations found in the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2019 guidelines.
METHODS: We collected every Instagram post incorporating a common, asthma-related hashtag between September 29, 2019 and October 5, 2019. Of these 2936 collected posts, we analyzed a random sample of 266, of which, 211 met our inclusion criteria. Using an inductive, qualitative approach, we categorized the promotional posts and compared each post's content with the recommendations contained in the 2019 GINA guidelines. Posts were categorized as "consistent with GINA" if the content was supported by the GINA guidelines. Posts that promoted content that was not recommended by or was unrelated to the guidelines were categorized as "not supported by GINA".
RESULTS: Of 211 posts, 89 (42.2%) were promotional in nature. Of these, a total of 29 (32.6%) were categorized as being consistent with GINA guidelines. The majority of posts were not supported by the guidelines. Forty-one (46.1%) posts promoted content that was not recommended by the current guidelines. Nineteen (21.3%) posts promoted content that was unrelated to the guidelines. The majority of unsupported content promoted non-pharmacological therapies (n = 39, 65%) to manage asthma, such as black seed oil, salt-room therapy, or cupping.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of Instagram posts in our sample promoted products or services that were not supported by GINA guidelines. These findings suggest a need for providers to discuss online health information with patients and highlight an opportunity for providers and social media companies to promote evidence-based asthma treatments and self-management advice online.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asthma; Clinical guidelines; Internet; Misinformation; Qualitative methods; Social media

Year:  2021        PMID: 33685515     DOI: 10.1186/s13223-021-00528-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol        ISSN: 1710-1484            Impact factor:   3.406


  8 in total

1.  The spreading of misinformation online.

Authors:  Michela Del Vicario; Alessandro Bessi; Fabiana Zollo; Fabio Petroni; Antonio Scala; Guido Caldarelli; H Eugene Stanley; Walter Quattrociocchi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Zika-Virus-Related Photo Sharing on Pinterest and Instagram.

Authors:  Isaac Chun-Hai Fung; Elizabeth B Blankenship; M Elizabeth Goff; Lindsay A Mullican; Kwun Cheung Chan; Nitin Saroha; Carmen H Duke; Marina E Eremeeva; King-Wa Fu; Zion Tsz Ho Tse
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 1.385

3.  The content of social media's shared images about Ebola: a retrospective study.

Authors:  E K Seltzer; N S Jean; E Kramer-Golinkoff; D A Asch; R M Merchant
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 2.427

4.  Secret Society 123: Understanding the Language of Self-Harm on Instagram.

Authors:  Megan A Moreno; Adrienne Ton; Ellen Selkie; Yolanda Evans
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.012

5.  COVID-19 misinformation: Accuracy of articles about coronavirus prevention mostly shared on social media.

Authors:  Justyna Obiała; Karolina Obiała; Małgorzata Mańczak; Jakub Owoc; Robert Olszewski
Journal:  Health Policy Technol       Date:  2020-11-01

Review 6.  A review of halotherapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Rachael Rashleigh; Sheree M S Smith; Nicola J Roberts
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2014-02-21

7.  Health-protective behaviour, social media usage and conspiracy belief during the COVID-19 public health emergency.

Authors:  Daniel Allington; Bobby Duffy; Simon Wessely; Nayana Dhavan; James Rubin
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 7.723

8.  Inoculating Against Fake News About COVID-19.

Authors:  Sander van der Linden; Jon Roozenbeek; Josh Compton
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-10-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.