Sten Dreborg1, Harold Kim2,3. 1. Department of Child and Adolescent Allergology, Women's and Children's Health, University of Uppsala, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden. sten.dreborg@kbh.uu.se. 2. Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Canada. 3. Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: For a century, epinephrine has been the drug of choice for acute treatment of systemic allergic reactions/anaphylaxis. For 40 years, autoinjectors have been used for the treatment of anaphylaxis. Over the last 20 years, intramuscular epinephrine injected into the thigh has been recommended for optimal effect. OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on pharmacokinetics of epinephrine autoinjectors. RESULTS: Six studies assessing epinephrine autoinjector pharmacokinetics were identified. The studies, all on healthy volunteers, were completed by Simons, Edwards, Duvauchelle, Worm and Turner over the span of 2 decades. Simons et al. published two small studies that suggested that intramuscular injection was superior to subcutaneous injection. These findings were partially supported by Duvauchelle. Duvauchelle showed a proportional increase in Cmax and AUC0-20 when increasing the dose from 0.3 to 0.5 mg epinephrine intramuscularly. Turner confirmed these findings. Simons, Edwards and Duvauchelle documented the impact of epinephrine on heart rate and blood pressure. Turner confirmed a dose-dependent increase in heart rate, cardiac output and stroke volume. Based on limited data, confirmed intramuscular injections appeared to lead to faster Cmax. Two discernable Cmax's were identified in most of the studies. We identified similarities and discrepancies in a number of variables in the aforementioned studies. CONCLUSIONS: Intramuscular injection with higher doses of epinephrine appears to lead to a higher Cmax. There is a dose dependent increase in plasma concentration and AUC0-20. Most investigators found two Cmax's with Tmax 5-10 min and 30-50 min, respectively. There is a need for conclusive trials to evaluate the differences between intramuscular and subcutaneous injections with the epinephrine delivery site confirmed with ultrasound.
BACKGROUND: For a century, epinephrine has been the drug of choice for acute treatment of systemic allergic reactions/anaphylaxis. For 40 years, autoinjectors have been used for the treatment of anaphylaxis. Over the last 20 years, intramuscular epinephrine injected into the thigh has been recommended for optimal effect. OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on pharmacokinetics of epinephrine autoinjectors. RESULTS: Six studies assessing epinephrine autoinjector pharmacokinetics were identified. The studies, all on healthy volunteers, were completed by Simons, Edwards, Duvauchelle, Worm and Turner over the span of 2 decades. Simons et al. published two small studies that suggested that intramuscular injection was superior to subcutaneous injection. These findings were partially supported by Duvauchelle. Duvauchelle showed a proportional increase in Cmax and AUC0-20 when increasing the dose from 0.3 to 0.5 mg epinephrine intramuscularly. Turner confirmed these findings. Simons, Edwards and Duvauchelle documented the impact of epinephrine on heart rate and blood pressure. Turner confirmed a dose-dependent increase in heart rate, cardiac output and stroke volume. Based on limited data, confirmed intramuscular injections appeared to lead to faster Cmax. Two discernable Cmax's were identified in most of the studies. We identified similarities and discrepancies in a number of variables in the aforementioned studies. CONCLUSIONS: Intramuscular injection with higher doses of epinephrine appears to lead to a higher Cmax. There is a dose dependent increase in plasma concentration and AUC0-20. Most investigators found two Cmax's with Tmax 5-10 min and 30-50 min, respectively. There is a need for conclusive trials to evaluate the differences between intramuscular and subcutaneous injections with the epinephrine delivery site confirmed with ultrasound.
Entities:
Keywords:
Area under the curve (AUC); Autoinjector; Cmax; Epinephrine; Intramuscular; Pharmacokinetics; Pre-filled syringe; Subcutaneous; Tmax
Authors: Amy Dodd; Anna Hughes; Nicholas Sargant; Andrew F Whyte; Jasmeet Soar; Paul J Turner Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2021-04-23 Impact factor: 5.262