Starting from March 2020, nasopharyngeal swabs collected in three provinces (Chieti, L’Aquila and Teramo) of Abruzzo, a central Region of Italy, were tested daily for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA at the Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell’Abruzzo e del Molise “G. Caporale” (IZSAM) (Danzetta et al., 2020).Several SARS-CoV-2 variants are now circulating globally and some of them have raised international concern. One of these is certainly represented by the Variant of Concern (VOC) 202012/01 which belongs to the lineage B.1.1.7 (Rambaut et al., 2020). VOC 202012/01 is considered to have higher transmission capabilities (Davies et al., 2021), and although mechanisms underlying VOC 202012/01 spread are largely unknown, VOC 202012/01 seems to be associated with higher viral loads and prolonged viral persistence in infectedpatients (Kissler et al., 2021). Furthermore, a six nucleotide deletion in the S protein encoding gene of VOC 202012/01is responsible for the S-gene drop out of a commonly used SARS-CoV-2 RNA real time-based detection kit (Thermoscentific, Waltham-MA, USA), which simultaneously detects two additional regions of the SARS-CoV-2 genome, namely ORF1ab and N protein encoding genes.In order to unravel the spread of VOC 202012/01 in Abruzzo, a surveillance plan was established by the IZSAM. A two-step strategy was adopted (Bal et al., 2021). The first included a random selection of swabs resulting positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in a time period ranging from the beginning of December 2020 to February 20th 2021 but showing a readout pattern characterized by the S-gene drop-out. The second included whole genome sequence analysis of the S-negative swab samples with Threshold cycle (CT) values ≤20. Overall, at least 10% of all positive samples were sequenced.In the period of observation, 1724 samples tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA with the S-negative readout pattern. Of these, 655 were sequenced. VOC 202012/01 was detected in 313 individuals, mostly originating from the province of Chieti (n = 258, 82.4%), which experienced an upsurge of COVID-19 cases in the first two months of the year 2021.Hence, we deeply investigated the molecular results of nasopharyngeal swabs tested from December 2020 to February 2021 to verify whether VOC 202012/01 was associated with higher RNA loads and prolonged persistence in the respiratory tract with respect to those of other SARS-CoV-2 variants.
A statistically significant difference (Mann–Whitney Test, P < 0.0001) was observed between the median values of C N observed in VOC 202012/01-infected individuals (median C N = 15.8) in comparison to S-positive infected individuals (median C N = 16.9) (Table 1
). Furthermore, a statistically significant difference (Mann–Whitney Test, P = 0.0317) was observed between the median values of the duration of RNA positivity at the molecular test in VOC 202012/01-infected individuals (n = 136; median value = 16 days) in comparison to those of S-positive infected individuals (n = 965; median value = 14 days) (Table 1).
Table 1
C N gene values of the first positive nasopharyngeal swab and persistence of positivity in patients tested from December 2020 to February 2021.
CT N values
Duration of positivity in nasopharyngeal swabs (days)
Patients with lineage B.1.1.7 (n = 313)
Others (n = 2344)
Patients with lineage B.1.1.7 (n = 136)
Others (n = 965)
Mean
15.4
16.4
P < 0.0001
17.4
17.1
P < 0.0317
Median
15.8
16.9
16.0
14.0
2.5 percentile
9.6
10.4
7.0
10.0
97.5 percentile
19.6
19.9
39.0
30.6
C N gene values of the first positive nasopharyngeal swab and persistence of positivity in patients tested from December 2020 to February 2021.Viral load kinetics and the duration of viral shedding are important determinants for disease transmission (Cevik et al., 2021). In this regard also our analysis, performed in a given time period, suggests that VOC 202012/01 persists longer in the respiratory tract of infected individuals reaching higher RNA loads with respect to those of other SARS-CoV-2 variants. Although not a good predictor for viral load at individual level (Dahdouh et al., 2020), C values may give an indirect indication of the viral load in the population, as already seen in other studies (Veronesi et al., 2020, Hay et al., 2021).One limitation of our study is the lack of information on the clinical status of all persons of two groups, which could be linked to different levels of C values and duration of the disease. However, the information about the presence or absence of clinical signs and the exitus of the disease was available for 140 VOC 202012/01-infected individuals and 961 S-positive infected individuals. In particular, 83.6% (C.I. 95%: 76.5%–88.8%) and 81.2% (C.I. 95%: 78.6%–83.5%) of individuals showed COVID-19 clinical signs in VOC 202012/01-infected and S-positive infectedpersons, respectively. The difference of the two percentages is not statistically significant (Chi-square: 0.4686, P = 0.4936). Similarly, the difference between the percentages of deaths in the two groups, 2.1% (C.I. 95%: 0.8%–6.1%) for VOC 202012/01-infected and 4.1% (C.I. 95%: 3.0%–5.5%), was not significant (exact Fisher value = 0.3493). These findings, although limited to a sub-sample of the study population, suggest a similar clinical picture and gravity in the two populations.Further analyses are reasonably warranted in order to establish the correlation between C values originating from infections with different variants and the presence of infectious (then transmissible) virus, the evolution of the spread of VOC 202012/01 in a given area and the impact on hospitalization and access to intensive care unit.
Conflict of interest
None.
Funding source
IZSAM funding was provided by the Italian Ministry of Health(Ricerca Corrente 2019 “NGS e diagnostica molecolare in Sanità Animale: Fast D2”, recipient Alessio Lorusso and Ricerca Corrente 2020 “PanCO: epidemiologia e patogenesi dei coronavirus umani ed animali”, recipient Alessio Lorusso).
Ethical approval
The results analysed in the present study derive from the official control activities performed by the Public Health Local Authority and no ethical approval is specifically requested.
Authors: Victoria T Chu; Noah G Schwartz; Marisa A P Donnelly; Meagan R Chuey; Raymond Soto; Anna R Yousaf; Emily N Schmitt-Matzen; Sadia Sleweon; Jasmine Ruffin; Natalie Thornburg; Jennifer L Harcourt; Azaibi Tamin; Gimin Kim; Jennifer M Folster; Laura J Hughes; Suxiang Tong; Ginger Stringer; Bernadette A Albanese; Sarah E Totten; Meghan M Hudziec; Shannon R Matzinger; Elizabeth A Dietrich; Sarah W Sheldon; Sarah Stous; Eric C McDonald; Brett Austin; Mark E Beatty; J Erin Staples; Marie E Killerby; Christopher H Hsu; Jacqueline E Tate; Hannah L Kirking; Almea Matanock Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 44.409
Authors: Francesca Di Giallonardo; Ilaria Puglia; Valentina Curini; Cesare Cammà; Iolanda Mangone; Paolo Calistri; Joanna C A Cobbin; Edward C Holmes; Alessio Lorusso Journal: Viruses Date: 2021-04-29 Impact factor: 5.048
Authors: Sarah P Otto; Troy Day; Julien Arino; Caroline Colijn; Jonathan Dushoff; Michael Li; Samir Mechai; Gary Van Domselaar; Jianhong Wu; David J D Earn; Nicholas H Ogden Journal: Curr Biol Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 10.834
Authors: Jeffrey Y Lee; Peter A C Wing; Dalia S Gala; Marko Noerenberg; Aino I Järvelin; Joshua Titlow; Xiaodong Zhuang; Natasha Palmalux; Louisa Iselin; Mary Kay Thompson; Richard M Parton; Maria Prange-Barczynska; Alan Wainman; Francisco J Salguero; Tammie Bishop; Daniel Agranoff; William James; Alfredo Castello; Jane A McKeating; Ilan Davis Journal: Elife Date: 2022-01-20 Impact factor: 8.713
Authors: K Rosenke; F Feldmann; A Okumura; F Hansen; T Tang-Huau; K Meade-White; B Kaza; B J Smith; P W Hanley; J Lovaglio; M A Jarvis; C Shaia; H Feldmann Journal: bioRxiv Date: 2021-06-13
Authors: Lucy G Thorne; Mehdi Bouhaddou; Ann-Kathrin Reuschl; Lorena Zuliani-Alvarez; Ben Polacco; Adrian Pelin; Jyoti Batra; Matthew V X Whelan; Manisha Ummadi; Ajda Rojc; Jane Turner; Kirsten Obernier; Hannes Braberg; Margaret Soucheray; Alicia Richards; Kuei-Ho Chen; Bhavya Harjai; Danish Memon; Myra Hosmillo; Joseph Hiatt; Aminu Jahun; Ian G Goodfellow; Jacqueline M Fabius; Kevan Shokat; Natalia Jura; Klim Verba; Mahdad Noursadeghi; Pedro Beltrao; Danielle L Swaney; Adolfo Garcia-Sastre; Clare Jolly; Greg J Towers; Nevan J Krogan Journal: bioRxiv Date: 2021-06-07