Literature DB >> 33684114

Complementary phase responses via functional differentiation of dual negative feedback loops.

Koichiro Uriu1, Hajime Tei1.   

Abstract

Multiple feedback loops are often found in gene regulations for various cellular functions. In mammalian circadian clocks, oscillations of Period1 (Per1) and Period2 (Per2) expression are caused by interacting negative feedback loops (NFLs) whose protein products with similar molecular functions repress each other. However, Per1 expression peaks earlier than Per2 in the pacemaker tissue, raising the question of whether the peak time difference reflects their different dynamical functions. Here, we address this question by analyzing phase responses of the circadian clock caused by light-induced transcription of both Per1 and Per2 mRNAs. Through mathematical analyses of dual NFLs, we show that phase advance is mainly driven by light inputs to the repressor with an earlier expression peak as Per1, whereas phase delay is driven by the other repressor with a later peak as Per2. Due to the complementary contributions to phase responses, the ratio of light-induced transcription rates between Per1 and Per2 determines the magnitude and direction of phase shifts at each time of day. Specifically, stronger Per1 light induction than Per2 results in a phase response curve (PRC) with a larger phase advance zone than delay zone as observed in rats and hamsters, whereas stronger Per2 induction causes a larger delay zone as observed in mice. Furthermore, the ratio of light-induced transcription rates required for entrainment is determined by the relation between the circadian and light-dark periods. Namely, if the autonomous period of a circadian clock is longer than the light-dark period, a larger light-induced transcription rate of Per1 than Per2 is required for entrainment, and vice versa. In short, the time difference between Per1 and Per2 expression peaks can differentiate their dynamical functions. The resultant complementary contributions to phase responses can determine entrainability of the circadian clock to the light-dark cycle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33684114      PMCID: PMC7971863          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol        ISSN: 1553-734X            Impact factor:   4.475


  66 in total

1.  Comparative study of circadian clock models, in search of processes promoting oscillation.

Authors:  Gen Kurosawa; Atsushi Mochizuki; Yoh Iwasa
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2002-05-21       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  A Period2 Phosphoswitch Regulates and Temperature Compensates Circadian Period.

Authors:  Min Zhou; Jae Kyoung Kim; Gracie Wee Ling Eng; Daniel B Forger; David M Virshup
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 3.  Transcriptional regulation by the numbers: models.

Authors:  Lacramioara Bintu; Nicolas E Buchler; Hernan G Garcia; Ulrich Gerland; Terence Hwa; Jané Kondev; Rob Phillips
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.578

4.  Bimodal regulation of mPeriod promoters by CREB-dependent signaling and CLOCK/BMAL1 activity.

Authors:  Zdenka Travnickova-Bendova; Nicolas Cermakian; Steven M Reppert; Paolo Sassone-Corsi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Human phase response curve to a 1 h pulse of bright white light.

Authors:  Melissa A St Hilaire; Joshua J Gooley; Sat Bir S Khalsa; Richard E Kronauer; Charles A Czeisler; Steven W Lockley
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Two period homologs: circadian expression and photic regulation in the suprachiasmatic nuclei.

Authors:  L P Shearman; M J Zylka; D R Weaver; L F Kolakowski; S M Reppert
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Positive autoregulation delays the expression phase of mammalian clock gene Per2.

Authors:  Yukino Ogawa; Nobuya Koike; Gen Kurosawa; Tomoyoshi Soga; Masaru Tomita; Hajime Tei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  rPer1 and rPer2 induction during phases of the circadian cycle critical for light resetting of the circadian clock.

Authors:  Mamoru Nagano; Akihito Adachi; Koh-hei Masumoto; Elizabeth Meyer-Bernstein; Yasufumi Shigeyoshi
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 9.  Generation of circadian rhythms in the suprachiasmatic nucleus.

Authors:  Michael H Hastings; Elizabeth S Maywood; Marco Brancaccio
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Identification of functional clock-controlled elements involved in differential timing of Per1 and Per2 transcription.

Authors:  Daisuke Yamajuku; Yasutaka Shibata; Masashi Kitazawa; Toshie Katakura; Hiromi Urata; Tomoko Kojima; Osamu Nakata; Seiichi Hashimoto
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.