Literature DB >> 33683822

Experimental support for genomic prediction of climate maladaptation using the machine learning approach Gradient Forests.

Matthew C Fitzpatrick1, Vikram E Chhatre2,3, Raju Y Soolanayakanahally4, Stephen R Keller2.   

Abstract

Gradient Forests (GF) is a machine learning algorithm that is gaining in popularity for studying the environmental drivers of genomic variation and for incorporating genomic information into climate change impact assessments. Here we (i) provide the first experimental evaluation of the ability of "genomic offsets" - a metric of climate maladaptation derived from Gradient Forests - to predict organismal responses to environmental change, and (ii) explore the use of GF for identifying candidate SNPs. We used high-throughput sequencing, genome scans, and several methods, including GF, to identify candidate loci associated with climate adaptation in balsam poplar (Populus balsamifera L.). Individuals collected throughout balsam poplar's range also were planted in two common garden experiments. We used GF to relate candidate loci to environmental gradients and predict the expected magnitude of the response (i.e., the genetic offset metric of maladaptation) of populations when transplanted from their "home" environment to the common gardens. We then compared the predicted genetic offsets from different sets of candidate and randomly selected SNPs to measurements of population performance in the common gardens. We found the expected inverse relationship between genetic offset and performance: populations with larger predicted genetic offsets performed worse in the common gardens than populations with smaller offsets. Also, genetic offset better predicted performance than did "naive" climate transfer distances. However, sets of randomly selected SNPs predicted performance slightly better than did candidate SNPs. Our study provides evidence that genetic offsets represent a first order estimate of the degree of expected maladaptation of populations exposed to rapid environmental change and suggests GF may have some promise as a method for identifying candidate SNPs.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  climate adaptation; climate change; forests; intraspecific variation; single nucleotide polymorphism; species distributions

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33683822     DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour        ISSN: 1755-098X            Impact factor:   7.090


  4 in total

Review 1.  Landscape Genomics in Tree Conservation Under a Changing Environment.

Authors:  Li Feng; Fang K Du
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 5.753

2.  Seeing the forest for the trees: Assessing genetic offset predictions from gradient forest.

Authors:  Áki Jarl Láruson; Matthew C Fitzpatrick; Stephen R Keller; Benjamin C Haller; Katie E Lotterhos
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 5.183

3.  Genomics and adaptation in forest ecosystems.

Authors:  Charalambos Neophytou; Katrin Heer; Pascal Milesi; Martina Peter; Tanja Pyhäjärvi; Marjana Westergren; Christian Rellstab; Felix Gugerli
Journal:  Tree Genet Genomes       Date:  2022-02-09

4.  Genomic and common garden approaches yield complementary results for quantifying environmental drivers of local adaptation in rubber rabbitbrush, a foundational Great Basin shrub.

Authors:  Trevor M Faske; Alison C Agneray; Joshua P Jahner; Lana M Sheta; Elizabeth A Leger; Thomas L Parchman
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 5.183

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.