Literature DB >> 33682971

Evaluation of survival rates of airborne microorganisms on the filter layers of commercial face masks.

Sang Bin Jeong1,2, Ki Joon Heo3, Hyun Sik Ko4, Jae Pyoung Ahn5, Seung-Bok Lee1,2, Jae Hee Jung4.   

Abstract

After the WHO designated COVID-19 a global pandemic, face masks have become a precious commodity worldwide. However, uncertainty remains around several details regarding face masks, including the potential for transmission of bioaerosols depending on the type of mask and secondary spread by face masks. Thus, understanding the interplay between face mask structure and harmful bioaerosols is essential for protecting public health. Here, we evaluated the microbial survival rate at each layer of commercial of filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) and surgical masks (SMs) using bacterial bioaerosols. The penetration efficiency of bacterial particles for FFRs was lower than that for SMs; however, the microbial survival rate for all tested masks was >13%, regardless of filtration performance. Most bacterial particles survived in the filter layer (44%-77%) (e.g., the core filtering layer); the outer layer also exhibited significant survival rates (18%-29%). Most notably, survival rates were determined for the inner layers (<1% for FFRs, 3%-16% for SMs), which are in contact with the respiratory tract. Our comparisons of the permeability and survival rate of bioaerosols in each layer will contribute to bioaerosol-face mask research, while also providing information to facilitate the establishment of a mask-reuse protocol.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  airborne microorganisms; bioaerosol; face mask; facepiece respirator; filter layer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33682971     DOI: 10.1111/ina.12816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indoor Air        ISSN: 0905-6947            Impact factor:   5.770


  1 in total

1.  Comparison of bacterial filtration efficiency vs. particle filtration efficiency to assess the performance of non-medical face masks.

Authors:  Henrietta Essie Whyte; Yoann Montigaud; Estelle Audoux; Paul Verhoeven; Amélie Prier; Lara Leclerc; Gwendoline Sarry; Coralie Laurent; Laurence Le Coq; Aurélie Joubert; Jérémie Pourchez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.