Literature DB >> 33682218

Predictors of permanent pacemaker insertion after TAVR: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis.

Sugandhi Mahajan1, Rahul Gupta2, Aaqib H Malik3, Pranav Mahajan1, Surya K Aedma1, Wilbert S Aronow3, Sanjay S Mehta4, Dhanunjaya R Lakkireddy5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the predictors associated with increased risk of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
BACKGROUND: While TAVR has evolved as the standard of care for patients with severe aortic stenosis, conduction abnormalities leading to the need for PPMI is one of the most common postprocedural complications.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify relevant trials from inception to May 2020. Summary effects were calculated using a DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model as odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals for all the clinical endpoints.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven observational studies with 71 455 patients were identified. The incidence of PPMI following TAVR was 22%. Risk was greater in men and increased with age. Patients with diabetes mellitus, presence of right bundle branch block, baseline atrioventricular conduction block, and left anterior fascicular block were noted to be at higher risk. Other significant predictors include the presence of high calcium volume in the area below the left coronary cusp and noncoronary cusp, use of self-expandable valve over balloon-expandable valve, depth of implant, valve size/annulus size, predilatation balloon valvuloplasty, and postimplant balloon dilation.
CONCLUSION: Fourteen factors were found to be associated with increased risk of PPMI after TAVR, suggesting early identification of high-risk populations and targeting modifiable risk factors may aid in reducing the need for this post TAVR PPMI.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conduction disturbances; meta-analysis; permanent pacemaker; predictors; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Year:  2021        PMID: 33682218     DOI: 10.1111/jce.14986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  4 in total

Review 1.  Transaxillary Versus Transaortic Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in the Treatment of Aortic Stenosis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ishaque Hameed; Mohammad O Khan; Ibtehaj Ul-Haque; Omer M Siddiqui; Syed A Samad; Shanza Malik; Samar Mahmood
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-12

Review 2.  Application of cardiovascular 3-dimensional printing in Transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Yanyan Ma; Yu Mao; Guangyu Zhu; Jian Yang
Journal:  Cell Regen       Date:  2022-09-19

3.  Insights in a restricted temporary pacemaker strategy in a lean transcatheter aortic valve implantation program.

Authors:  Thijmen W Hokken; Marjo de Ronde; Quinten Wolff; Thom Schermers; Joris F Ooms; Maarten P van Wiechen; Isabella Kardys; Joost Daemen; Peter P de Jaegere; Nicolas M Van Mieghem
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 2.585

4.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with the Self-Expandable Core Valve Evolut Prosthesis Using the Cusp-Overlap vs. Tricusp-View.

Authors:  Philipp Maximilian Doldi; Lukas Stolz; Felix Escher; Julius Steffen; Jonas Gmeiner; Daniel Roden; Marie Linnemann; Kornelia Löw; Simon Deseive; Thomas J Stocker; Martin Orban; Hans Theiss; Konstantinos Rizas; Adrian Curta; Sebastian Sadoni; Joscha Buech; Dominik Joskowiak; Sven Peterss; Christian Hagl; Steffen Massberg; Jörg Hausleiter; Daniel Braun
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.