BACKGROUND: Introduction of vector flow mapping (VFM) based on the combination of color Doppler and speckle-tracking echocardiography provides noninvasive assessment of early diastolic intra-ventricular pressure gradient (ED-IVPG). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of peak ED-IVPG measurement just after aortic valve closure using VFM for noninvasive estimation of impaired LV untwisting velocity as the index of LV relaxation in the clinical setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study included 65 consecutive patients in whom echocardiography was performed for the assessment of LV function. We assessed peak ED-IVPG between LV apex and base by VFM analysis software. We also measured peak LV untwisting velocity and LV twisting by speckle-tracking strain analysis. Peak ED-IVPG was successfully and quickly assessed in all the study patients. Peak ED-IVPG was significantly reduced in patients with impaired peak LV untwisting velocity (< 70 degrees/s) compared with patients without impaired peak LV untwisting velocity. The receiver operating characteristic analysis showed the best cut-off value of peak ED-IVPG for determining impaired peak LV untwisting velocity was 0.40 mmHg (sensitivity 81%, specificity 74%, and area under the curve 0.81). There was a well correlation between peak ED-IVPG and peak LV untwisting velocity (r = 0.64, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The present results suggest that peak ED-IVPG just after aortic valve closure measured by VFM may be used as noninvasive index for estimation of impaired LV untwisting velocity in the clinical setting.
BACKGROUND: Introduction of vector flow mapping (VFM) based on the combination of color Doppler and speckle-tracking echocardiography provides noninvasive assessment of early diastolic intra-ventricular pressure gradient (ED-IVPG). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of peak ED-IVPG measurement just after aortic valve closure using VFM for noninvasive estimation of impaired LV untwisting velocity as the index of LV relaxation in the clinical setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study included 65 consecutive patients in whom echocardiography was performed for the assessment of LV function. We assessed peak ED-IVPG between LV apex and base by VFM analysis software. We also measured peak LV untwisting velocity and LV twisting by speckle-tracking strain analysis. Peak ED-IVPG was successfully and quickly assessed in all the study patients. Peak ED-IVPG was significantly reduced in patients with impaired peak LV untwisting velocity (< 70 degrees/s) compared with patients without impaired peak LV untwisting velocity. The receiver operating characteristic analysis showed the best cut-off value of peak ED-IVPG for determining impaired peak LV untwisting velocity was 0.40 mmHg (sensitivity 81%, specificity 74%, and area under the curve 0.81). There was a well correlation between peak ED-IVPG and peak LV untwisting velocity (r = 0.64, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The present results suggest that peak ED-IVPG just after aortic valve closure measured by VFM may be used as noninvasive index for estimation of impaired LV untwisting velocity in the clinical setting.