| Literature DB >> 33681836 |
Yoshifumi Tsuda1, Masatoshi Amako2, Kenichi Takashima3, Masahisa Kawaguchi4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Proprioceptive feedback is a reflex dislocation prevention mechanism that contributes to shoulder joint stability. In patients with Bankart lesions, the anteroinferior glenohumeral ligament complex is damaged and reduces the likelihood of tensile stress. As a result, proprioceptive feedback does not work, which leads to instability. Surgical reconstruction is indicated to restore proprioception, but the details of recovery after arthroscopic surgery are unknown. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether arthroscopic Bankart repair can improve the position sense of the shoulder.Entities:
Keywords: Dynamometer; anteroinferior glenohumeral ligament complex; arthroscopic Bankart repair; joint position sense; proprioception; traumatic shoulder joint instability
Year: 2021 PMID: 33681836 PMCID: PMC7910747 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.10.027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JSES Int ISSN: 2666-6383
Figure 1Measurement of position sense using the Biodex System 3. The trunk of the patient was fixed with a seat belt and the patient was blindfolded to prevent visual assistance.
Figure 2(Right) Based on 90° shoulder abduction and neutral internal/external rotation position, (Left) the external rotation angle of 75° was set as the target angle.
Functional scores
| Pre | 6 mo | 1 y | Last | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JSS instability | 60.3 (14.6) | 86.0 (9.1) | 88.8 (8.5) | 88.6 (10.3) |
| JSS sport | 56.4 (18.9) | 69.2 (15.6) | 77.6 (14.7) | 81.9 (16.2) |
| JOA | 76.6 (11.7) | 93.5 (5.8) | 95.0 (5.4) | 95.7 (5.1) |
| Rowe | 38.5 (18.1) | 92.0 (8.0) | 93.6 (10.5) | 94.2 (9.4) |
| UCLA | 19.7 (3.7) | 27.0 (2.7) | 27.8 (2.1) | 28.3 (3.1) |
JOA, Japan Orthopedic Association; UCLA, University of California at Los Angeles; JSS, Japan Shoulder Society.
The average values, standard deviation (SD) are shown.
P < .01.
Objective functional scores
| Pre | 6 mo | 1 y | Last | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pain | 3.7 (0.5) | 3.9 (0.2) | 3.9 (0.2) | 3.9 (0.1) |
| ROM | 3.7 (0.5) | 3.9 (0.2) | 3.9 (0.2) | 4.0 (0.1) |
| Power | 3.4 (0.8) | 3.9 (0.3) | 3.9 (0.3) | 3.9 (0.2) |
| General health | 3.8 (0.3) | 3.9 (0.2) | 3.9 (0.2) | 4.0 (0.1) |
| ADL | 3.8 (0.4) | 3.9 (0.2) | 4.0 (0.2) | 4.0 (0.1) |
| Sports | 2.3 (1.1) | 3.2 (0.8) | 3.3 (0.7) | 3.5 (0.8) |
The average values and standard deviation (SD) are shown.
P < .01.
Figure 3Comparison of RAI between preoperative patient group and control group. The graphs show average values and error bars mean standard deviation (SD). RAI, reproductive angle inaccuracy.
Preoperative and postoperative RAI
| Pre | 6 mo | 1 y | Last | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAI | 6.4 (3.8) | 5.0 (3.7) | 4.9 (2.5) | 4.7 (2.5) |
RAI, reproductive angle inaccuracy.
The average values and standard deviation (SD) are shown.
P < .01.
P < .05.