| Literature DB >> 33681548 |
Namitha K Preman1, Supriya Jain1, Renjith P Johnson1.
Abstract
"Smart" polymeric nanoformulations are evolving as a promising therapeutic, diagnostic paradigm. The polymeric nanovehicles demonstrated excellent capability to encapsulate theranostic cargos and their successful delivery in physiological conditions and even to monitor the therapeutic response. Currently, polymer nanogels (NGs) are established as capable carriers toward triggered delivery of diverse therapeutic and diagnostic agents. Notably, biodegradable and "intelligent" NGs constructed from intelligent polymers are highly beneficial because of their responsiveness toward endogenous as well as exogenous stimuli like pH gradients, bioresponsiveness, photoresponsiveness, temperature, and so on. In the past decade, plenty of multifunctional NGs with excellent targetability and sensitivity were reported for a wide range of theragnostic applications. This mini-review briefly propounds the synthesis strategies of "smart" NGs and summarizes the notable applications like delivery of genetic materials, anticancer agents, photodynamic/photothermal therapies, imaging, and biosensing. Herein, we have also addressed the current clinical status of NGs and the major challenges that are essential to overcome for the further advancement of NGs for specific applications.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33681548 PMCID: PMC7931185 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c05276
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1(A) Illustration of representative stimuli-responsive nanogel architectures. The responsive functionality and the corresponding stimuli response are highlighted in each structure. (B) The classification of stimuli-responsive nanogels based on their morphology and structural characteristics.
Figure 2(A) (i) Illustration of magnetic nanogel synthesis through conventional aqueous precipitation radical copolymerization reaction of oligo(ethylene glycol) methacrylate monomers. (ii) The fabrication of a magnetic nanogel and loading and release of doxorubicin under an alternative magnetic field. Reprinted with permission from ref (14). Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society). (B) Synthesis of p(DEAEMA-co-tBMA) nanogels through ARGET ATRP and subsequent siRNA encapsulation. Reprinted with permission from ref (12). Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.
Figure 4(A) Synthetic route for histidine-modified dextran and the fabrication of pH-responsive metallo-supramolecular nanogels. Reprinted with permission from ref (19). Copyright 2015 Elsevier. (B) Preparation of extremely small iron oxide nanoparticles encapsulated with poly(carboxybetaine methacrylate) nanogels and modification with the c(RGD) ligand as an activatable MRI contrast agent with switchable function from a T2 contrast agent to a T1 one through the stimuli-responsiveness toward glutathione. Reprinted with permission from ref (32). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.
Figure 3(A) Synthesis of near-infrared fluorescent and reduction-sensitive polypeptide nanogels through N-carboxy-anhydride (NCA) ring-opening polymerization of l-lysine and l-cystine NCA and subsequent conjugation of cyanine dyes. Reprinted with permission from ref (13). Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society. (B) The reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer polymerization synthesis of random copolymers with pendant pyridyldisulfide groups and the fabrication of biohybrid nanogels demonstrate the structural transition above the lower critical solution temperature. Reprinted with permission from ref (25). Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.
Figure 5(i) TEM and DLS characterization of Dox-NGs (a) and Dox-iRGD-BSA-AuNCs-NGs (b). Dox-iRGD-BSA AuNCs NGs. (ii) The in vitro release profiles of Dox from various Dox-loaded NGs at 37 °C in PBS of different pH. (iii) The cellular uptake of different Dox formulations in HUVECs (c) and B16 (d) cells after 1, 4, and 12 h incubation. (iv) The intracellular delivery of BSA-AuNCs-NGs (A and C) and iRGD-BSA-AuNCs-NGs (B and D) in HUVECs (A and B) and B16 cells (C and D). The cells were incubated with BSA-AuNCs-NGs and iRGD-BSA AuNCs-NGs at 250 μg/mL for 4 h at 37 °C and then detected by confocal microscopy. Reprinted with permission from ref (10). Copyright 2013 Elsevier.
Figure 6(i) (a) Hydrodynamic diameter of p(DEAEMA-co-tBMA) nanogels and (b) zeta potential measurements indicate a positive surface charge of ∼19 mV, which decreases slightly after loading with negatively charged RNA. (ii) (a) Relative turbidity measurements indicate that the microgel platform degrades in the presence of trypsin but remains intact in the presence of PBS or gastric fluid. (b) Relative viability of RAW 264.7 cells incubated with varying concentrations of degraded or nondegraded microgels for 24 h. (iii) (a) Bright-field/fluorescent panels and (b) Z-stack orthogonal images of RAW 264.7 macrophages incubated with degraded microgels containing P(DEAEMA-co-tBMA) nanogels. The released nanogels were efficiently uptaken by the RAW 264.7 cells (blue, DAPI; red, wheat germ agglutinin (membrane); green, NBD-Cl conjugated nanogels). (iv) TNF-α knockdown induced by siRNA carried by Lipofectamine LTX, p(DEAEMA-co-tBMA) nanogels, or degraded microgels containing p(DEAEMA-co-tBMA) nanogels. Reprinted with permission from ref (12). Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.
Figure 7(i) Photothermal activity and thermoresponsiveness of the semi-interpenetrated PPY nanogels. (a) IR pictures of a sample during irradiation and (b) concentration-dependent temperature difference reached after 5 min of NIR irradiation. (ii) Release profiles of MTX above and below VPTT of semi-interpenetrated PPY nanogels upon NIR irradiation. (iii) Photothermal and combinational therapy in vitro. Cell viability of A549 lung carcinoma cell line determined by an MTT assay incubated for 48 h with MTX-loaded (10 wt %) and -unloaded PPY nanogels with and without exposure to NIR laser (785 nm, 500 mW) for 7 min. (iv) (a) x–y MIPs of PA images of excised organs at 800 nm. (b) Mean PA image intensity of excised, formalin-fixed organs of a female nude mouse treated over five consecutive days with 100 mg/kg of PPY nanogels. (c) Photothermal response (max. ΔT after 5 min) of the same samples after irradiation with the output of a NIR lamp. (v) (A) IR image of mice under NIR irradiation with i.t. injected nanogels. (B) MIP of photoacoustic image (PI) of an untreated control. (C) MIP of PI of a tumor after injection of nanogels and 5 min NIR irradiation ex vivo. (D, E) Rel. tumor growth over time of mice treated i.t. with MTX-loaded various nanogels with and without exposure to NIR. (F) Rel. tumor growth over time after i.v. administration of five consecutive doses of PPY/Co-dPG and exposure to NIR (5 min) 48 h after the last injection with respect to controls. Reprinted with permission from ref (18). Copyright 2019 Elsevier.
Figure 8(i) (a) Color T1-weighted MR images of the ultrasmall Fe3O4 NPs and Fe3O4/PEI-Ac NGs at different Fe concentrations, indicating the gradual increase of MR signal intensity. (b) Linear fitting of 1/T1 as a function of Fe concentration for the two different materials. (ii) The Dox release from the Fe3O4/PEI-Ac NG/Dox under different pH. (iii) (a) The CCK-8 assay of 4T1 cell viability after treatment formulations with different Dox concentrations for 24 h. (b) The mean fluorescence of cells treated with Fe3O4/PEI-Ac NGs/Dox as a function of Dox concentration. (c) Confocal microscopic images of 4T1 cells after treatment for 4 h with various formulations at 10 μg/mL of Dox concentration. (iv) The in vivo T1-weighted MR images (a) and MR signal-to-noise ratio (b) of the xenografted 4T1 tumors before and at different time points post i.v. injection of Fe3O4 NPs or Fe3O4/NGs-Ac NGs/Dox (Fe mass = 150 μg, in 0.2 mL of PBS for each mouse). Reprinted with permission from ref (29). Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society.
Representative “Smart” Biocompatible Nanogel Systems and Their Synthesis Routes, Types of Experiments, Various Therapeutics, and Potential Therapeutic and Diagonostic Applications
| nanogel system | synthesis method | therapeutics/theranostic agent | type of experiment
( | application | ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PNIPAM NGs | precipitation-free radical polymerization | Dox | drug delivery | ( | |
| P(NIPAM- | free radical precipitation polymerization | Dox | drug delivery | ( | |
| (PAA- | emulsion radical polymerization | Dox | drug delivery and cell imaging | ( | |
| P(NIPAM- PPY) NGs | free radical polymerization | MTX | photothermal chemotherapy | ( | |
| PNIPAM- | RAFT polymerization | protein | protein delivery | ( | |
| cationic glyco-NGs | RAFT polymerization | siRNA | gene delivery | ( | |
| p(DEAEMA- | ATRP | siRNA | gene delivery | ( | |
| PEI NGs | miniemulsion polymerization | Fe3O4 NPs/Dox | MR image-guided chemotherapy | ( | |
| zwitterionic NGs | precipitation-free radical polymerization | indocyanine green (ICG)/Dox | photothermal therapy | ( | |
| PNVCL/Fe3O4 NGs | miniemulsion polymerization | 5-fluorouracil | magnetic guiding drug delivery | ( | |
| dextran NGs | emulsion polymerization | Dox | drug delivery | ( | |
| poly(carboxybetaine methacrylate) NGs | emulsion polymerization | ESIONPs | MR imaging | ( | |
| Ag@p[(VPBA-DMAEA)] NGs | free radical polymerization | insulin | glucose-sensing and insulin delivery | ( | |
| polypeptide NGs | NCA ring-opening polymerization | Dox | image-guided drug delivery | ( | |
| supramolecular NGs | free radical polymerization | Dox/Zn-Por | chemo-photodynamic therapy | ( | |