Literature DB >> 33681407

Using deep learning for pixel-defect corrections in flat-panel radiography imaging.

Eunae Lee1, Eunyeong Hong2, Dong Sik Kim1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Flat-panel radiography detectors employ thin-film transistor (TFT) panels to acquire high-quality x-ray images. Pixel defects occur due to circuit shorts or opens in the TFT panel. The defects may degrade the image quality, as well as lower the production yield, and eventually raise the production cost. Hence, it is important to develop an appropriate defect correction algorithm for acquired images. Traditional correction algorithms are based on a complicated adaptive filtering technique, which exploits neighbor pixels, to faithfully preserve the edge components. Because of the complexity of the traditional sophisticated approaches, optimizing their correction performances is difficult. Approach: We considered various pixel-defect correction algorithms based on different deep learning models, such as the artificial neural network (ANN), convolutional neural network (CNN), concatenate CNN, and generative adversarial networks (GAN). We considered two cases of maximal defect sizes, 3 × 3 and 5 × 5    pixels , and conducted extensive learning experiments to find the best structures of the learning models using the mean square error (MSE) as the loss function.
Results: To conduct experiments, practical chest x-ray images were acquired from a general radiography detector. The MSE values of the correction results from ANN, CNN, concatenate CNN, and GAN were 69.40, 75.13, 68.21, and 73.77, respectively, and were much smaller than that of the conventional template match correction method. Conclusions: A concatenate CNN showed the best defect-correction performance. However, ANN could achieve a similar correction performance with much smaller encoding complexity. Therefore, the single-layer ANN can efficiently conduct defect corrections in terms of both correction and complexity.
© 2021 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Entities:  

Keywords:  deep learning; defect correction; defective pixel; flat-panel detectors; radiography imaging

Year:  2021        PMID: 33681407      PMCID: PMC7930811          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.8.2.023501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  6 in total

Review 1.  The physics of computed radiography.

Authors:  J A Rowlands
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-12-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Robust autonomous detection of the defective pixels in detectors using a probabilistic technique.

Authors:  Siddhartha Ghosh; Dirk Froebrich; Alex Freitas
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 1.980

Review 3.  Deep learning in radiology: An overview of the concepts and a survey of the state of the art with focus on MRI.

Authors:  Maciej A Mazurowski; Mateusz Buda; Ashirbani Saha; Mustafa R Bashir
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  X-ray detectors for digital radiography.

Authors:  M J Yaffe; J A Rowlands
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Empirical investigation of the signal performance of a high-resolution, indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imager (AMFPI) for fluoroscopic and radiographic operation.

Authors:  L E Antonuk; Y El-Mohri; J H Siewerdsen; J Yorkston; W Huang; V E Scarpine; R A Street
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Automatic defect detection for TFT-LCD array process using quasiconformal kernel support vector data description.

Authors:  Yi-Hung Liu; Yan-Jen Chen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.