| Literature DB >> 33681011 |
Abstract
The first Mohalla or Community clinic was set up in July 2015 in Delhi, India. Four hundred and eighty such clinics were set up in Delhi, since then. This review was conducted to synthesize evidence on access, utilization, functioning, and performance of Mohalla clinics. A desk review of secondary data from published research papers and reports was conducted initially from February-May 2020 and updated in August 2020. Eleven studies were included in the final analysis. Studies have documented that more than half to two-third of beneficiaries at these clinics were women, elderly, poor, and with school education up to primary level. One-third to two-third of all beneficiaries had come to the government primary care facility for the first time. A majority who attended clinics lived within 10 min of walking distances. There was high rate of satisfaction (around 90%) with overall services, doctor-patient interaction time and the people were willing to return for future health needs. Most beneficiaries received consultations, medicines, and diagnostics at no cost. A few challenges such as dispensing of medicines for shorter duration, lack of awareness about the exact location of the clinics, and services available among target beneficiaries, and the incomplete records maintenance and reporting system at facilities were identified. Mohalla Clinics of Delhi ensured continuity of primary care and laboratory services during COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. In summary, Mohalla Clinics have made primary care accessible and affordable to under-served population (thus, addressed inequities) and brought attention of policy makers on strengthening and investing on health services. The external evaluations and assessments on the performance of these clinics, with robust methodology are needed. The services through these clinics should be expanded to deliver comprehensive package of primary healthcare with inclusion of preventive, promotive, community outreach, and other public health services. Copyright:Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Community clinics; Health services; India; Mohalla Clinics; primary health care; universal health coverage
Year: 2020 PMID: 33681011 PMCID: PMC7928089 DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1574_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Family Med Prim Care ISSN: 2249-4863
Summary description of studies and reports included, with sample size and key findings[
| Authors, year | Sample size; facilities covered and respondents | Key findings |
|---|---|---|
| Mishra, 2020[ | Survey of catchment areas of | The study focus was on assessment of governance of health services and role of transformational leadership and street level bureaucrats (doctors, teachers and social workers) in satisfaction with health services. |
| Agarwal, et al. 2020[ | Community-based cross-sectional study, with primary data collection from 25 Mohalla Clinics across Delhi in June July 2018. | Women & elderly were found to be more likely to use these clinics. The distance from the clinics, and awareness about the services were associated with increased use of Clinics. |
| Jha & Singh, 2019[ | Field survey of 16 Mohalla Clinics between Nov Dec 2018. | An average of 114 patients per day visited each clinic. People living up to 2-3 kilometers of distance visited these facilities. Start time of 8 am and assured provision of doctor on time ensured that people could go to work by 9 am. Patient reported that the waiting time at facilities was reduced. Majority of clinics were opened on time. |
| Sah et al., 2019[ | Primary survey conducted at 12 A total of 180 respondents (15 from each facility) were interviewed in year 2017. A total of 12 doctors and other staffs were also interviewed. | 72% of total respondents were women; nearly 83% had income less than 2.5 lakh and 56% had received either no education or up to primary level. Exactly half of the respondents were housewives by occupation. 34% of respondents used to visit private facilities before these clinics were started. 54% were attending a government facility and nearly 9% to both type of facilities. Nearly half of the total still continued to visit alternative facilities. |
| Sardesai & Mohanti, 2019[ | Centre for studies of developing societies (CSDS) and Lokniti Survey was conducted from Nov 22 to Dec 03, 2019 and 2,298 people from 115 polling stations across 23 assembly constituencies of Delhi. It was focused on overall health services along with specific questions on Mohalla clinics. | 31% of respondent had either themselves or someone from their household visited Mohalla Clinics at least once I last five years. One in three of those who visited these clinics, been to these clinics 5 or more times. 91% of the visitors to Mohalla clinics were satisfied with the services with 55% of total fully satisfied. |
| The economic society, 2020[ | Quantitative and qualitative study and survey across 5 districts; 35 doctors and other staff; 356 respondents in areas of 42 Mohalla clinics; data collection was done in Oct 2019 | Nearly 82% of people attending these clinics were from low income group; 90% were very satisfied with medicines and treatment provided; nearly three-fourth found clinics easily accessible. Average waiting time reported was 35-40 minutes at the clinics. Average duration of medicines dispensed was 7 days. |
| Praja Foundation, 2019[ | Information collection through legal mechanism of the right to information act, 2005 of India. | The report noted poor management of data at these facilities. Responses on query were provided by 3 of 11 districts of Delhi. There was poor digitization of most healthcare facilities. Issues of mis-governance and lack of data on outpatient attendance. |
| ID Insight, 2019[ | Two sample surveys to understand awareness, usage, and service delivery through Mohalla Clinics. In one was through the exit interviews of 1716 patients at 109 clinics, with at least 10 or more patients per clinic. Second survey was of general population covering 1,410 households, 6,824 household members, 135 clinic areas. These respondents in second survey were living within 1 or 2 kilometers of the clinic. | Nearly two fifth of respondents in the catchment area were aware about exact location of Mohalla clinic in their neighborhood. Most had become aware when they had seen the clinic or through the word-of-mouth. Nearly one third of people who sought healthcare responded that had they been aware about community clinics, they would have sought care at those clinics. Of those, who attended services at Mohalla clinic, considered the quality of services at par or better than other public or private medical facilities. |
| Bhandari A, et al. 2017[ | This was a comparative study on hospitals and Mohalla clinics. Three Mohalla Clinics and Three hospitals were visited and exit interviews of a total of 105 respondent at Mohalla Clinics and 159 at hospitals were interviewed. Doctors at Mohalla Clinics were also interviewed. | Amongst those attending Mohalla clinics, before these clinics, one -sixth attended dispensaries; one third government hospitals and remaining half attended private facility. |
| Khanijou & Sundararaman, 2017[ | Qualitative case study with field visits to 5 Mohalla clinics. The authors clarified that this work was a documentation and evaluation. | The authors described the engagement and process for sample collection by phlebotomist, outsourcing of laboratory function, Corporate social responsibility and private sector engagement in Mohalla clinics. |
| Hazarika N, et al. 2016[ | One of the first published report, based upon survey of 4 Mohalla clinics. Of these surveys were done at two clinics only and only qualitative information was collected from other two clinics. Total sample from two clinics was reported to be around 30 people. | People were often not aware about the public health care, government program and preventive healthcare Most respondents had visited private clinics before opening of these clinics and reported to have waited for 1 to 8 hours for seeking outpatient care. With these clinics, the waiting time had come down to 15-20 min. The assured provision of doctor, medicine and diagnostics was appreciated by people. One of the major expectation people had from Mohalla clinics was faster availability of lab reports. A few people in locality suggested that morning only time is not very convenient for them and evening clinics should be considered. The doctors posted at these facilities wanted to gain experience and were thrilled about providing health care to poor and underserved. A doctor at these clinics suggested that clinics should be linked to NGOs, which can deliver health educational activities and public health activities in the areas. |
Comparative performance of hospitals and Mohalla clinics, 2017[18]
| Hospitals ( | Mohalla Clinics ( | |
|---|---|---|
| A | ||
| Time taken in seeking care | ||
| <10 min | 04 | 59 |
| 11-30 min | 16 | 37 |
| 31-60 min | 19 | 08 |
| 61-90 min | 23 | 01 |
| More than 90 min | 97 | 00 |
| B | ||
| Received the all the medicine they were prescribed | 97 (61%) | 90 (86%) |
| C | ||
| Rating by the benefices for services delivered | ||
| One out of five | 08 (5%) | 00 |
| Two out of five | 27 (17%) | 05 (4.5% |
| Three out of five | 36 (22%) | 11 (10%) |
| Four out of five | 39 (25%) | 22 (20%) |
| Five out of five | 50 (31%) | 67 (65%) |
Adapted from reference 16 and other sources
Approach to health service delivery in select countries[21222324]
| Thailand: Primary healthcare services through district health system with typical district’s catchment population of around 50,000 served by a district hospital and 10-15 subdistrict health centres, each with 3-5 paramedical staff. Primary Care Units: For every 10,000-15,000 registered beneficiaries. Contracted (district) hospitals to set up one primary care units for every 10,000-15,000; the “contracting unit for primary care” or CUP. |