Literature DB >> 33680973

Molecular Subtype May Be More Associated With Prognosis and Chemotherapy Benefit Than Tumor Size in T1N0 Breast Cancer Patients: An Analysis of 2,168 Patients for Possible De-Escalation Treatment.

Siji Zhu1, Yafen Li1, Weiguo Chen1, Xiaochun Fei2, Kunwei Shen1, Xiaosong Chen1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Breast cancer (BC) patients with T1N0 tumors have relatively favorable clinical outcomes. However, it remains unclear whether molecular subtypes can aide in prognostic prediction for such small, nodal-negative BC cases and guide decision-making about escalating or de-escalating treatments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: T1N0 BC patients diagnosed between 2009 and 2017 were included and classified into three subgroups according to receptor status: 1) hormonal receptor (HR)+/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-; 2) HER2+; and 3) triple negative (TN) (HR-/HER2-). Patients' characteristics and relapse events were reviewed. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression were used to assess the iDFS and BCSS. The effects of risk factors and adjuvant treatment benefits were evaluated by calculating hazard ratios (HRs) for invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) with Cox proportional hazards models.
RESULTS: In total, 2,168 patients (1,435 HR+/HER2-, 427 HER2+, 306 TN) were enrolled. The 5-year iDFS rates were 93.6, 92.7, and 90.6% for HR+/HER2-, HER2+, and TN patients, respectively (P = 0.039). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that molecular subtype (P = 0.043), but not tumor size (P = 0.805), was independently associated with iDFS in T1N0 BC. TN patients [HRs = 1.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.11-2.84, P = 0.018] had a higher recurrence risk than HR+/HER2- patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy benefit was not demonstrated in all T1N0 patients but interacted with molecular subtype status. TN (adjusted HRs = 2.31, 95% CI = 0.68-7.54) and HER2+ (adjusted HRs = 2.26, 95% CI = 0.95-5.63) patients receiving chemotherapy had superior iDFS rates. Regarding BCSS, molecular subtype tended to be related to outcome (P = 0.053) and associated with chemotherapy benefit (P = 0.005).
CONCLUSION: Molecular subtype was more associated with disease outcome and chemotherapy benefit than tumor size in T1N0 BC patients, indicating that it may guide possible clinical de-escalating therapy in T1N0 BC.
Copyright © 2021 Zhu, Li, Chen, Fei, Shen and Chen.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; chemotherapy benefit; de-escalating therapy; molecular subtype; prognosis

Year:  2021        PMID: 33680973      PMCID: PMC7933524          DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.636266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Oncol        ISSN: 2234-943X            Impact factor:   6.244


  29 in total

1.  Seven-Year Follow-Up Analysis of Adjuvant Paclitaxel and Trastuzumab Trial for Node-Negative, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Sara M Tolaney; Hao Guo; Sonia Pernas; William T Barry; Deborah A Dillon; Lauren Ritterhouse; Bryan P Schneider; Fei Shen; Kit Fuhrman; Michele Baltay; Chau T Dang; Denise A Yardley; Beverly Moy; P Kelly Marcom; Kathy S Albain; Hope S Rugo; Mathew J Ellis; Iuliana Shapira; Antonio C Wolff; Lisa A Carey; Beth Overmoyer; Ann H Partridge; Clifford A Hudis; Ian E Krop; Harold J Burstein; Eric P Winer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Outcome of T1N0M0 breast cancer in relation to St. Gallen risk assignment criteria for adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  I Garassino; G Gullo; S Orefice; L Tondulli; G Masci; P Salvini; M Eboli; L Di Tommaso; L Giordano; M Alloisio; M Roncalli; A Santoro
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 4.380

3.  Six-year follow-up of patients with microinvasive, T1a, and T1b breast carcinoma.

Authors:  G B Mann; E R Port; C Rizza; L K Tan; P I Borgen; K J Van Zee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Are There Breast Cancer Patients with Node-Negative Small Tumours, Who Do Not Benefit from Adjuvant Systemic Therapy?

Authors:  Tanja Stüber; Igor Novopashenny; Joachim Diessner; Catharina Bartmann; Roland Stein; Mathias Krockenberger; Sebastian Häusler; Wolfgang Janni; Rolf Kreienberg; Maria Blettner; Achim Wöckel; Manfred Wischnewsky
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 2.935

5.  A risk stratification by hormonal receptors (ER, PgR) and HER-2 status in small (< or = 1 cm) invasive breast cancer: who might be possible candidates for adjuvant treatment?

Authors:  Yeon Hee Park; Seung Tae Kim; Eun Yoon Cho; Yoon La Choi; Oh-Nam Ok; Hae Jin Baek; Jeong Eon Lee; Seok Jin Nam; Jung-Hyun Yang; Won Park; Doo Ho Choi; Seung Jae Huh; Jin Seok Ahn; Young-Hyuck Im
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Relative Effectiveness of Letrozole Compared With Tamoxifen for Patients With Lobular Carcinoma in the BIG 1-98 Trial.

Authors:  Otto Metzger Filho; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Elizabeth Mallon; Barry Gusterson; Giuseppe Viale; Eric P Winer; Beat Thürlimann; Richard D Gelber; Marco Colleoni; Bent Ejlertsen; Marc Debled; Karen N Price; Meredith M Regan; Alan S Coates; Aron Goldhirsch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Distant invasive breast cancer recurrence risk in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive T1a and T1b node-negative localized breast cancer diagnosed from 2000 to 2006: a cohort from an integrated health care delivery system.

Authors:  Louis Fehrenbacher; Angela M Capra; Charles P Quesenberry; Regan Fulton; Parveen Shiraz; Laurel A Habel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Clinical significance of HER2-positive and triple-negative status in small (≤ 1 cm) node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Elan Gorshein; Paula Klein; Susan K Boolbol; Theresa Shao
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Definitive results of a phase III adjuvant trial comparing three chemotherapy regimens in women with operable, node-positive breast cancer: the NSABP B-38 trial.

Authors:  Sandra M Swain; Gong Tang; Charles E Geyer; Priya Rastogi; James N Atkins; Paul P Donnellan; Louis Fehrenbacher; Catherine A Azar; André Robidoux; Jonathan A Polikoff; Adam M Brufsky; David D Biggs; Edward A Levine; John L Zapas; Louise Provencher; Donald W Northfelt; Soonmyung Paik; Joseph P Costantino; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; David G Hicks; Mitch Dowsett; Lisa M McShane; Kimberly H Allison; Donald C Allred; John M S Bartlett; Michael Bilous; Patrick Fitzgibbons; Wedad Hanna; Robert B Jenkins; Pamela B Mangu; Soonmyung Paik; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Patricia A Spears; Gail H Vance; Giuseppe Viale; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  1 in total

1.  Predictive Value of Ultrasound Characteristics for Disease-Free Survival in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Qiang Guo; Zhiwu Dong; Lixin Jiang; Lei Zhang; Ziyao Li; Dongmo Wang
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.