Literature DB >> 33680971

Sex Differences in Time to Treat and Outcomes for Gliomas.

Nickolas Stabellini1,2, Halle Krebs3, Nirav Patil1,4,5,6, Kristin Waite1,4,7, Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan1,4,5,7,8,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gliomas are the most common type of primary malignant brain tumor in adults, representing one third of all primary and central nervous system (CNS) tumors and 80% of malignant tumors diagnosed in the Western world. Epidemiological data indicate that the overall incidence and mortality of cancer is higher in males, while females have a better prognosis. The goal of this study is to determine whether there are sex differences in the time to treat and clinical outcomes in patients with glioma.
METHODS: Glioblastoma (GB) and Lower Grade Glioma (LGG) patients were defined per the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS) from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for diagnosis years 2004 to 2016. Associations between sex and time to treatment variables as well as associations between sex and multiple clinical outcomes were assessed using univariable and multivariable models.
RESULTS: A total of 176,100 patients were used for analysis (124,502 GBM and 51,598 LGG). Males had a statistically significant association with >7 days to surgery (OR = 1.09, CI 1.05-1.13, p < 0.001) but this association was not observed in the multivariable model (OR = 1.05, CI 0.96-1.16, p = 0.25). After adjustment for key variables including time to treat variables, males with GB and LGG had a higher risk of death (HR = 1.11, CI 1.09-1.13, p < 0.001, HR = 1.09, CI 1.03-1.15, p < 0.001; respectfully). Sex differences in 90-day mortality for GBM were not found after adjustment (OR for males = 0.99, CI 0.91-1.08, p = 0.93). For LGG, both the univariable and multivariable logistic regression models showed no sex differences in 90-day mortality (OR for males = 1.03, CI 0.94-1.12, p = 0.45; multivariable OR for males = 0.81, CI 0.62-1.06, p = 0.13).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on NCDB data, there were no statistically significant differences in time to treatment between males and females, however males had a higher proportion of GB and LGG as well as a higher risk of death compared to females.
Copyright © 2021 Stabellini, Krebs, Patil, Waite and Barnholtz-Sloan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  National Cancer Database; glioblastoma; gliomas; outcomes; sex differences; treatment

Year:  2021        PMID: 33680971      PMCID: PMC7933512          DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.630597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Oncol        ISSN: 2234-943X            Impact factor:   6.244


  19 in total

1.  Females have the survival advantage in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Quinn T Ostrom; Joshua B Rubin; Justin D Lathia; Michael E Berens; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Improved survival of glioblastoma patients treated at academic and high-volume facilities: a hospital-based study from the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Ping Zhu; Xianglin L Du; Jay-Jiguang Zhu; Yoshua Esquenazi
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 3.  Epidemiology and Molecular Epidemiology.

Authors:  Luc Bauchet; Quinn T Ostrom
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.509

4.  Patterns and disparities of care in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Emily V Dressler; Meng Liu; Catherine R Garcia; Therese A Dolecek; Thomas Pittman; Bin Huang; John L Villano
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2018-05-22

5.  Impact of academic facility type and volume on post-surgical outcomes following diagnosis of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Alan Hauser; Sunil W Dutta; Timothy N Showalter; Jason P Sheehan; Surbhi Grover; Daniel M Trifiletti
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 6.  Glioblastoma and other malignant gliomas: a clinical review.

Authors:  Antonio Omuro; Lisa M DeAngelis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Sexually dimorphic RB inactivation underlies mesenchymal glioblastoma prevalence in males.

Authors:  Tao Sun; Nicole M Warrington; Jingqin Luo; Michael D Brooks; Sonika Dahiya; Steven C Snyder; Rajarshi Sengupta; Joshua B Rubin
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Survival rates and patterns of care for patients diagnosed with supratentorial low-grade gliomas: data from the SEER program, 1973-2001.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Claus; Peter M Black
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2012-2016.

Authors:  Quinn T Ostrom; Gino Cioffi; Haley Gittleman; Nirav Patil; Kristin Waite; Carol Kruchko; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 12.300

10.  Sex is an important prognostic factor for glioblastoma but not for nonglioblastoma.

Authors:  Haley Gittleman; Quinn T Ostrom; L C Stetson; Kristin Waite; Tiffany R Hodges; Christina H Wright; James Wright; Joshua B Rubin; Michael E Berens; Justin Lathia; James R Connor; Carol Kruchko; Andrew E Sloan; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2019-05-18
View more
  2 in total

1.  The current state of glioma data registries.

Authors:  Alexander G Yearley; Julian Bryan Iorgulescu; Ennio Antonio Chiocca; Pier Paolo Peruzzi; Timothy R Smith; David A Reardon; Michael A Mooney
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2022-06-24

2.  Serum microRNA-4297 is a sex-specific predictive biomarker of glioma grade and prognosis.

Authors:  Wenshen Xu; Liming Huang; Bingsen Xie; Bin Yang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.086

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.