| Literature DB >> 33680859 |
Yuki Okazaki1,2, Takayuki Furumatsu1, Takaaki Hiranaka1, Keisuke Kintaka1, Yuya Kodama1,3, Yusuke Kamatsuki1, Toshifumi Ozaki1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Medial meniscus (MM) tears are associated with both acute and chronic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency and can lead to degenerative changes in the knee. ACL reconstruction (ACLR) combined with the meniscal repair was reported to result in decreased anterior knee joint laxity with evidence of improved patient-reported outcomes in the long term. However, a subtle tear of the MM posterior segment, also known as a ramp lesion, is difficult to detect on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and is frequently missed in ACL-deficient knees. However, there are few studies about the associations between bone geometry and ramp lesion of the MM. This study aimed to compare sagittal medial tibial slope (MTS), medial tibial plateau depth (MTPD), and coronal tibial slope (CTS) between ACL-injured knees with and without ramp lesion of the MM. We hypothesised that patients with ramp lesion of the MM and a concomitant ACL injury have a steeper MTS and shallower MTPD than those without ramp lesion of the MM.Entities:
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; Magnetic resonance imaging; Medial tibial slope; Proximal tibial geometry; Ramp lesion; Risk factor
Year: 2021 PMID: 33680859 PMCID: PMC7896126 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmart.2021.01.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol ISSN: 2214-6873
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients.
| Variable | Group A | Group AM | |
| Number of patients | 27 | 15 | |
| Age (years) | 27.0 ± 11.6 | 26.8 ± 12.8 | >0.05 |
| Height (m) | 1.6 ± 0.04 | 1.6 ± 0.04 | >0.05 |
| Weight (kg) | 59.7 ± 10.4 | 58.8 ± 14.5 | >0.05 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 23.7 ± 4.2 | 23.1 ± 5.8 | >0.05 |
| Duration from injury to surgery (weeks) | 18.7 ± 12.0 | 16.6 ± 14.2 | >0.05 |
| Pre-operative Tegner activity score | 4.4 ± 2.0 | 4.2 ± 1.4 | >0.05 |
| Pre-operative side-to-side difference in ATT | 4.5 ± 1.5 | 6.0 ± 2.1 | <0.05∗ |
| Post-operative side-to-side difference in ATT | −0.3 ± 1.0 | −0.3 ± 1.4 | >0.05 |
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
Significant difference (∗P < 0.05) was observed using Mann Whitney-U test.
ATT, anterior tibial translation.
Group A, group that had anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction only.
Group AM, group that had anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and medial meniscus repair.
Fig. 1Magnetic resonance images of a knee with an ACL injury.
(a) Determination of the tibial axis (long-dashed line) according to the method described by Hudek et al. The solid line is perpendicular to the tibial axis.
(b) Measurement of the MTS (1°) in the knee without ramp lesion of the MM. An angle is formed by the solid line perpendicular to the tibial axis and the dashed line connecting the uppermost superior-anterior and posterior cortex edges.
(c) Measurement of the MTS (8°) in the knee with ramp lesion of the MM. An angle is formed by the solid line perpendicular to the tibial axis and the dashed line connecting the uppermost superior-anterior and posterior cortex edges. ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; MM, medial meniscus; MTS, medial tibial slope.
Fig. 2Magnetic resonance image-based MTS along with ROC curve for MTS. (a) The MTS was significantly steeper in the group with an ACL injury and ramp lesion of the MM (Group AM) than in the group with an ACL injury only (Group A). ∗P < 0.01.
(b) The sensitivity/specificity was 0.73/0.76 when MTS cut-off value was set at 5.0° (red point).
ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; MM, medial meniscus; MTS, medial tibial slope; ROC, receiver operating characteristic.